Pediatrician, Tarazona Health Center, Spain
*Corresponding author:Raquel Bernal Calmarza, Pediatrician, Tarazona Health Center, Spain
Submission: February 09, 2026;Published: February 25, 2026
ISSN: 2689-2707Volume6 Issue 3
Background: The period between 2024 and 2026 represents a transformative era for Artificial Intelligence
(AI) in medicine, characterized by the shift from narrow, task-specific algorithms to Multimodal Large
Language Models (M-LLMs) and Generalist Medical AI (GMAI). While technical capabilities have advanced
exponentially, the clinical integration of these tools remains complex and unevenly distributed.
Objective: This literature review synthesizes the latest research (2024-2026) to evaluate the state of AI in
clinical practice, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, administrative efficiency through ambient intelligence,
and the ethical-legal frameworks governing autonomous systems.
Methods: A literally review of the higher-impact articles published since January 2024 was conducted.
Sources included PubMed, JMIR, and medRxiv, with a focus on bibliometric analyses, clinical trials of
generative AI, and regulatory policy documents.
Result: Current literature indicates that generative AI has achieved “specialist-level” performance
in written clinical reasoning and diagnostic imaging across multiple specialties, including radiology
and pathology. “Ambient AI scribes” have demonstrated a significant reduction in physician burnout
(approximately 40%) by automating EHR documentation. However, a significant “maturity gap” persists:
despite the volume of publications, fewer than 1% of models have reached the stage of randomized
controlled trials. Emerging research highlights critical concerns regarding “automation bias,” algorithmic
transparency (the “black box” problem), and the potential for AI to exacerbate health inequities in lowresource
settings.
Discussion: The discourse has evolved from pure technical validation to implementation science. Key
themes include the necessity of “Human-in-the-Loop” systems, the impact of the EU AI Act on medical
software development, and the urgent need for a radical restructuring of medical education to include
AI literacy.
Conclusions: AI has transitioned from an experimental adjunct to a foundational infrastructure in
modern healthcare. Future success depends not on increasing model parameters, but on achieving
seamless interoperability, ensuring algorithmic fairness and establishing clear liability frameworks for
autonomous medical decision-making.
Keywords:Artificial intelligence; Genomics; Clinical data; Well-being; Healthcare
a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.crimsonpublishers.com.
Best viewed in