1Chief radiologists, Apollo Hospitals Guwahati, Assam, India
2Prof of interdisciplinary studies, Girijananda Chaudhury University, Guwahati, Assam, India
3Radiology post graduate trainee, Assam Medical college, Dibrugarh, Assam, India
*Corresponding author:Suman Hazarika, Chief radiologists, Apollo Hospitals Guwahati, Assam, India
Submission: May 05, 2026;Published: June 23, 2026
ISSN: 2576-8816Volume12 Issue 2
For most of its history, radiology has been a visual discipline - one where diagnostic knowledge comes from imaging features that physicians learn, often painstakingly, to recognize through years of clinical exposure. Radiomics moves away from this in a fairly fundamental way, taking medical images and converting them into large quantitative datasets that can then be run through computational tools for analysis. Radiomics refers to the process of extracting a large number of quantitative features (measurable characteristics) from medical images and analyzing them using computers and statistical techniques. The idea is that instead of depending entirely on what a radiologist can see, you extract a broad range of imaging features (such as texture, shape, or intensity) and feed them into statistical or machine-learning models - and in doing so, surface patterns that wouldn’t otherwise be visible. These patterns can, at least in many cases, point to underlying disease processes and have a genuine bearing on clinical decisions.
This article approaches radiomics not simply as another technical upgrade, but as something that arguably changes how radiological knowledge is generated in the first place. Computational methods (such as machine learning) bring with them a kind of diagnostic insight that sits outside the bounds of human perception, and that raises real questions about what the radiologist’s role looks like going forward in a field that is becoming increasingly data-driven. None of this is without its difficulties, though. Reproducibility, meaning the ability to get similar results in different settings, is a persistent concern; results don’t always transfer well across different patient populations. Making meaningful progress on these fronts will take more consistent methodological standards and validation that is genuinely rigorous - not just technically, but prospectively - before radiomics can realistically move into wider use.
Keywords:Radiomics; Artificial intelligence; Quantitative imaging; Precision medicine; Medical evidence; Diagnostic radiology
a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.crimsonpublishers.com.
Best viewed in