Abstract

Orthopedic Research Online Journal

Bankart Lesion: Comparison between Open and Arthroscopic Techniques

Submission: October 02, 2017; Published: January 10, 2018

DOI: 10.31031/OPROJ.2018.01.000523

ISSN: 2576-8875
Volume1 Issue5

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the results from open and arthroscopic Bankart lesion repair.

Methods: Retrospective study of clinical records review and telephone contact of results after one year follow up of Bankart lesion surgery in a total of 56patients, 38 with arthroscopic repair and 18 with open repair. We evaluated the epidemiology as mean and frequency, the results were compared with instability Carter - Rowe score and submitted to independent analysis groups.

Results: Prevalence of Bankart lesions was higher in men (87%), dominant side (59%) and more frequent in patients less than 30 years (73.2%). There was surgical failure in 5.3% of cases. There was no statistical significative difference result in Carter - Rowe score. ROM results were better in arthroscopic repair group. Conclusion: Both techniques have good functionality results, with a better gain of mobility for the arthroscopic technique but with an increase rate of recurrence than the open repair.

Conclusion: (1) Both the techniques have good results, even though few studies in the literature comparing homogeneous groups of Patients (2) The possibility of further episodes of dislocation is apparently greater in the arthroscopic technique (3) The arthroscopic technique seems to have a better result when compared to mobility (4) It is important to be able to correctly indicate the surgery and correctly perform the adopted technique.

Get access to the full text of this article