1Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
2Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
3DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Germany
4ZDI Heidelberg, Germany
*Corresponding author:Ann-Kathrin Rahm, Heidelberg Center for Heart Rhythm Disorders, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, and DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Heidelberg/Mannheim, 69120 Heidelberg, Germanys
Submission: October 17, 2025;Published: October 31, 2025
ISSN: 2689-2707Volume6 Issue 1
Background: In case of ICD lead dysfunction, interference signals can be misinterpreted as ventricular
fibrillation, leading to inappropriate shocks, which are harmful and traumatic for patients. This study
retrospectively analyzed a large single-center device registry to assess the clinical impact of remote
monitoring on electrode defects in relation to symptoms, presentation mode, and treatment.
Method: Adult ICD and S-ICD patients who underwent lead revision between 2015 and 2023 were
included. Two groups were identified: a conservatively ambulatory monitored control group and a
telemonitored group. Data were descriptively analyzed. Logistic regression was used for “number of
inappropriate shocks”, and Kaplan-Meier for “time from detection of RV lead defect to revision”.
Result: Numbers of actively telemonitored patients increased from 2017 to 2023 from 0 to 109. Of in total
146 telemonitored patients during that time frame, 5 (3.4%) underwent revision for electrode defects,
compared to 145 (4.7%) of 3056 conservatively monitored patients. Eleven patients in the control
group and none in the telemonitored group experienced inappropriate shocks (p=0.792). The time from
defect detection to revision was shorter in the telemonitored group (4.0 vs. 30.9 days, p=0.692). Most
patients with defective lead presented because of a warning tone/vibration alarm (29.9%), followed by
the defect being diagnosed during a planned ambulatory ICD interrogation (20.4%). 6.4% of patients
experienced an inappropriate shock. For most patients, the setting of diagnosis of the defect was either
their cardiologist or the outpatient office of a university hospital (together 49.0%). 26.8% presented
directly in the emergency room.
Conclusion: Remote monitoring reduced inappropriate shocks by enabling earlier detection of lead
defects. Expanding telemonitoring may improve early detection and may prevent inappropriate shocks
and utilization of emergency medicine services.
Keywords:ICD lead dysfunction; ICD lead revision; Telemonitoring; Inadequate shocks
a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.crimsonpublishers.com.
Best viewed in