The aim of this essay is to present the model called ‘Formative and Shared-Assessment in Physical Education’ (F&SA in PE) and the advantages that it has when developing PE models focused on student learning. In the first section we explain the basic characteristics of the model and in the second section we explain its advantages when developing a more educational PE. The evidence obtained in different educational contexts shows the positive impact of F&SA in the learning outcomes in PE and PE-Teacher Education (PETE).
The model called ‘Formative and Shared Assessment in Physical Education’ (F&SA in PE) is widely disseminated in the international literature in Spanish [1-6], but less so in the international literature in English [7-10]. This is a model generated entirely in the Spanish education system, and contrasted in all its stages (pre-school, primary, secondary and higher education). A recent study analyses the similarities and differences with the most widespread model in the international literature in English, called ‘Assessment for Learning in PE’ (AfL in PE). It is also strongly related to the AIESEP (2020) [11] position statement for PE assessment. F&SA focus is based on the linkage of two concepts: ‘formative assessment’ (learning-oriented assessment and integrated in the daily teaching-learning process) and ‘shared assessment’ (promoting students’ participation in assessment by using assessment as a dialogical process between teacher and students). In order to be able to affirm that a PE assessment system is F&SA, it must fulfil a series of characteristics: (a) assessment has to be clearly oriented to improve student learning, the teaching quality of the teaching staff and the improvement of the teaching-learning processes in the PE subject, not only to the qualification; (b) assessment has to be part of the teaching-learning process; (c) promote the active participation of students in the assessment processes, usually through the techniques of self-assessment, peer-assessment and shared assessment [9,11]. The F&SA in PE model has been applied in many PE classrooms over the last 25 years, at all educational stages [12-18]. We have organized the main results obtained into three categories: (A) advantages; (B) disadvantages:
Advantages
A. Is feasible at all stages
B. Habitually improves the students´ learning, involvement, motivation and processes of autonomy and self-regulation in learning
C. Improves classroom mood
D. Improves teaching-learning processes in PE programs and is often helpful in teachers’ professional development processes
Disadvantages
a) Students need time to understand the assessment system
and use it to improve their learning in PE
b) Teachers need to adjust the workload involved in this type
of assessment system to make it viable and sustainable over
time.
On the other hand, it is important to consider that the F&SA
model is very suitability and alignment with consolidated
and emerging Curriculum Models of PE: Teaching Games for
Understanding, Sports Education, Cooperative Learning, Personal
and Social Responsibility, Attitudinal Style, Self-Construction of
Materials and Self-Regulation of Learning [19,20].
López-Pastor VM (1999) Assessment practices in physical education: Case studies in primary, secondary and teacher training. Secretariat of Publications and Editorial Exchange University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
López-Pastor VM (2006) Evaluation in physical education: Review of traditional models and proposal of an alternative. In: Miño, Dávila (Eds.), Formative and Shared Evaluation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
López-Pastor VM, Pérez-Pueyo Á (2017) Formative and shared evaluation in education: Successful experiences in all educational stages. University of León, León, Spain.
Castejón FJ, López Pastor VM, Julián JA, Zaragoza J (2011) Formative evaluation and academic performance in the initial training of physical education teachers. International Journal of Medicine and Sciences of Physical Activity and Sports 11(42): 328-346.
Herranz-Sancho M, López-Pastor VM (2014) Is it viable to carry out self-assessment and shared assessment processes in physical education in the primary education stage? A longitudinal case study. Physical Education Magazine 134: 29-36.
Herrero-González D, López-Pastor VM, Manrique JC (2020) Formative and shared assessment in cooperative learning contexts in primary physical education. Culture, Science and Sports 15(44): 213-222.
López-Pastor VM (2004) Physical education in early childhood education: A proposal and some experiences. In: Miño, Dávila (Eds.), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pérez Pueyo Á, Hortigüela D, Fernández-Río J (2020) Formative evaluation and pedagogical models: Attitudinal style, cooperative learning, comprehensive model and sports education. Spanish Magazine of Physical Education and Sports 428: 47-66.
Hortigüela D, Pérez Pueyo Á, Fernández-Río J (2020) Formative evaluation and pedagogical models: Model of personal and social responsibility and self-construction of materials. Spanish Magazine of Physical Education and Sports 430: 23-41.
Professor, Chief Doctor, Director of Department of Pediatric Surgery, Associate Director of Department of Surgery, Doctoral Supervisor Tongji hospital, Tongji medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Senior Research Engineer and Professor, Center for Refining and Petrochemicals, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Interim Dean, College of Education and Health Sciences, Director of Biomechanics Laboratory, Sport Science Innovation Program, Bridgewater State University