Crimson Publishers Publish With Us Reprints e-Books Video articles

Full Text

Research & Investigations in Sports Medicine

Why to do Formative and Shared Assessment in Physical Education

Víctor ML Pastor*, Teresa F Nieto and Carla F Garcimartín

Faculty of Education of Segovia, University of Valladolid, Spain

*Corresponding author:Víctor ML Pastor, Faculty of Education of Segovia, University of Valladolid, Spain

Submission: September 10, 2024;Published: September 19, 2024

DOI: 10.31031/RISM.2024.10.000746

ISSN 2578-0271
Volume10 Issue5

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to present the model called ‘Formative and Shared-Assessment in Physical Education’ (F&SA in PE) and the advantages that it has when developing PE models focused on student learning. In the first section we explain the basic characteristics of the model and in the second section we explain its advantages when developing a more educational PE. The evidence obtained in different educational contexts shows the positive impact of F&SA in the learning outcomes in PE and PE-Teacher Education (PETE).

Keywords: Formative assessment; Shared assessment; Physical education; Assessment for learning; Physical education teacher education

Introduction

The model called ‘Formative and Shared Assessment in Physical Education’ (F&SA in PE) is widely disseminated in the international literature in Spanish [1-6], but less so in the international literature in English [7-10]. This is a model generated entirely in the Spanish education system, and contrasted in all its stages (pre-school, primary, secondary and higher education). A recent study analyses the similarities and differences with the most widespread model in the international literature in English, called ‘Assessment for Learning in PE’ (AfL in PE). It is also strongly related to the AIESEP (2020) [11] position statement for PE assessment. F&SA focus is based on the linkage of two concepts: ‘formative assessment’ (learning-oriented assessment and integrated in the daily teaching-learning process) and ‘shared assessment’ (promoting students’ participation in assessment by using assessment as a dialogical process between teacher and students). In order to be able to affirm that a PE assessment system is F&SA, it must fulfil a series of characteristics: (a) assessment has to be clearly oriented to improve student learning, the teaching quality of the teaching staff and the improvement of the teaching-learning processes in the PE subject, not only to the qualification; (b) assessment has to be part of the teaching-learning process; (c) promote the active participation of students in the assessment processes, usually through the techniques of self-assessment, peer-assessment and shared assessment [9,11]. The F&SA in PE model has been applied in many PE classrooms over the last 25 years, at all educational stages [12-18]. We have organized the main results obtained into three categories: (A) advantages; (B) disadvantages:

Advantages

A. Is feasible at all stages
B. Habitually improves the students´ learning, involvement, motivation and processes of autonomy and self-regulation in learning
C. Improves classroom mood
D. Improves teaching-learning processes in PE programs and is often helpful in teachers’ professional development processes

Disadvantages

a) Students need time to understand the assessment system and use it to improve their learning in PE
b) Teachers need to adjust the workload involved in this type of assessment system to make it viable and sustainable over time.

On the other hand, it is important to consider that the F&SA model is very suitability and alignment with consolidated and emerging Curriculum Models of PE: Teaching Games for Understanding, Sports Education, Cooperative Learning, Personal and Social Responsibility, Attitudinal Style, Self-Construction of Materials and Self-Regulation of Learning [19,20].

References

    1. López-Pastor VM (1999) Assessment practices in physical education: Case studies in primary, secondary and teacher training. Secretariat of Publications and Editorial Exchange University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
    2. López-Pastor VM (2006) Evaluation in physical education: Review of traditional models and proposal of an alternative. In: Miño, Dávila (Eds.), Formative and Shared Evaluation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    3. López-Pastor VM (2008) Implementing a formative and shared assessment system in higher education teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education 31(3): 293-311.
    4. López-Pastor VM (2009) Formative and shared evaluation in higher education: Proposals, techniques, instruments and experiences. Narcea, Madrid, Spain.
    5. López-Pastor VM, Monjas R, Manrique JC, Barba JJ, González M (2008) Implications of evaluation in cooperative physical education approaches. The role of formative and shared evaluation in the necessary search for coherence. Culture and Education 20(4): 457-477.
    6. López-Pastor VM, Pérez-Pueyo Á (2017) Formative and shared evaluation in education: Successful experiences in all educational stages. University of León, León, Spain.
    7. López-Pastor VM, Fernández-Balboa JM, Santos ML, Fraile A (2012) Students' self-grading, professor's grading and negotiated final grading at three university programs: Analysis of reliability and grade difference ranges and tendencies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37(4): 453-464.
    8. López Pastor VM, Kirk D, Lorente-Catalán E, MacPhail A, Macdonald D (2013) Alternative assessment in physical education: A review of international literature. Sport, Education & Society 18(1): 57-76.
    9. López-Pastor VM, Sicilia Camacho A (2017) Formative and shared assessment in higher education. Lessons learned and challenges for the future. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42(1): 77-97.
    10. Hamodi C, López Pastor VM, López Pastor AT (2017) If i experience formative assessment whilst studying at university, will I put it into practice later as a teacher? formative and shared assessment in Initial Teacher Education (ITE). European Journal of Teacher Education 40(2): 171-190.
    11. AIESEP (2020) Position statement on physical education assessment, AIESEP.
    12. Barrientos EJ, López Pastor VM, Lorente Catalán E, Kirk D (2022) Challenges with using formative and authentic assessment in physical education teaching from experienced teachers’ perspectives. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education 14(2): 109-126.
    13. Castejón FJ, López Pastor VM, Julián JA, Zaragoza J (2011) Formative evaluation and academic performance in the initial training of physical education teachers. International Journal of Medicine and Sciences of Physical Activity and Sports 11(42): 328-346.
    14. Fuentes Nieto T, López Pastor VM, Palacios A (2022) A Combination of transformative and authentic assessment through ICT in physical education. Retos 44: 728-38.
    15. Herranz-Sancho M, López-Pastor VM (2014) Is it viable to carry out self-assessment and shared assessment processes in physical education in the primary education stage? A longitudinal case study. Physical Education Magazine 134: 29-36.
    16. Herrero-González D, López-Pastor VM, Manrique JC (2020) Formative and shared assessment in cooperative learning contexts in primary physical education. Culture, Science and Sports 15(44): 213-222.
    17. López-Pastor VM (2004) Physical education in early childhood education: A proposal and some experiences. In: Miño, Dávila (Eds.), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    18. Pérez Pueyo Á, Hortigüela D, Fernández-Río J (2020) Formative evaluation and pedagogical models: Attitudinal style, cooperative learning, comprehensive model and sports education. Spanish Magazine of Physical Education and Sports 428: 47-66.
    19. Hortigüela D, Pérez Pueyo Á, Fernández-Río J (2020) Formative evaluation and pedagogical models: Model of personal and social responsibility and self-construction of materials. Spanish Magazine of Physical Education and Sports 430: 23-41.
    20. López Pastor VM, Castejón J, Sicilia Camacho A, Navarro V, Webb G (2011) The process of creating a cross-university network for formative and shared assessment in higher education in Spain and its potential applications. Innovations in Education and Teaching Internacional 48(1): 79-90.

    © 2024 Víctor ML Pastor. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.