In-Depth Analysis of Bioplastics: Paving the Way to a Sustainable Future

The pressing need for sustainable alternatives to conventional plastics is driven by their severe environmental impact. Global plastic production has now reached about 50% of the total amount produced since 1950, with forecasts suggesting it could exceed 600 million metric tons annually within 20 years 1 [1]. This rise in production exacerbates environmental damage caused by traditional plastics like polyethylene and polystyrene, which are derived from fossil fuels, emit greenhouse gases, and persist in the environment [2]. These issues contribute to soil degradation and marine pollution, resulting in an annual environmental cost projected to surpass $500 billion [3]. In contrast, bioplastics, made from renewable plantbased or microbial sources, present a viable alternative [4]. They can be either biodegradable or bio-based, offering benefits such as a reduced carbon footprint and improved waste management [5]. Despite challenges like higher costs and variable degradation rates, shifting to bioplastics could cut the annual production of conventional plastics by up to 50% over the next decade [6], significantly mitigating their environmental impact.

Bioplastics encompass a broad range of materials, each distinguished by its source and production method. Early examples include starch-based bioplastics, made from materials like maize and potatoes, and cellulose-based ones from sources such as cotton and wood pulp [7]. Starch-based bioplastics, while biodegradable, often suffer from brittleness and incomplete degradation, leaving behind residual non-degradable substances [8]. In contrast, cellulose-based bioplastics, including regenerated cellulose, offer enhanced mechanical properties and have achieved a significant global market value of about $2 billion annually [9]. More advanced types, such as Polylactic Acid (PLA) and Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), provide notable improvements in both performance and environmental impact [10]. PLA, derived from fermented plant starches, has a market capacity of 3 million metric tons per year and boasts a 30% reduction in energy consumption and a 70% decrease in greenhouse gas emissions compared to traditional plastics [11]. PHA, produced through bacterial fermentation, is fully biodegradable and is projected to capture a $1.5 billion market by 2025 [12]. Furthermore, drop-in bioplastics like bio-polyethylene (PE) and bio-polypropylene (PP) are chemically identical to conventional plastics but originate from renewable sources, while fossil fuel-based bioplastics, such as polybutyrate adipate terephthalate (PBAT) [13], combine petrochemical elements with biodegradable features and are seeing a market expansion with a 7% compound annual growth rate.

Bioplastics provide various waste management options, including recycling, composting, and energy recovery, thanks to their renewable origins and diverse characteristics. The waste management hierarchy prioritizes reduction, reuse, and recycling, though integrating bioplastics into existing systems can be challenging due to their different materials [14]. Biodegradable bioplastics, such as PLA, can decompose into simple compounds in composting conditions, offering a significant advantage over conventional plastics, which can remain in landfills for centuries [15]. Composting bioplastics helps reduce landfill waste and creates valuable organic compost [16]. Recycling techniques, including mechanical, chemical, and organic methods, also play a role in managing bioplastic waste, despite the challenges associated with their limited presence in the waste stream [16]. Energy recovery methods, like anaerobic digestion and incineration, provide additional ways to handle bioplastic waste, potentially generating renewable energy and minimizing environmental impact [17]. The bioplastics market is expanding rapidly, driven by growing environmental concerns and technological progress [18], with projections indicating continued growth and an increasing role in sustainable waste management solutions.

Bioplastics present a viable solution to the environmental challenges posed by traditional plastics, such as pollution and resource scarcity [19]. This review explores the role of bioplastics in advancing sustainability, focusing on their potential to decrease dependence on fossil fuels, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and address the global plastic waste crisis. Drawing on recent high- impact research, the review assesses the advantages and limitations of various bioplastic types, including starch-based, cellulose-based, and advanced options like Polylactic Acid (PLA) and Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). It examines the effectiveness of bioplastics in waste management strategies, such as recycling, composting, and energy recovery, and their potential integration into circular economy practices. The review highlights that bioplastics could reduce overall plastic waste by up to 50% and contribute significantly to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as responsible consumption (SDG 12) and climate action (SDG 13). By fostering technological advancements and broadening their application, bioplastics offer a pathway to enhanced environmental sustainability and reduced ecological impact.

Plastic and bioplastics

The environmental impact of traditional plastics underscores the urgent need for sustainable alternatives. Over the past 13 years, global plastic production has reached approximately 50% of the total amount produced since 1950, with projections suggesting that production could exceed 600 million metric tons annually within the next two decades [20]. This increase in plastic production is compounded by the persistent nature of conventional plastics, such as polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, and polystyrene, which contribute significantly to environmental degradation [21]. These materials not only consume large quantities of fossil fuels but also emit greenhouse gases and persist in the environment, leading to issues such as reduced soil fertility and harm to marine life [22]. For instance, improper disposal of plastic waste has been linked to a 20% decline in soil productivity and severe entanglement risks for over 700 marine species [23]. As a result, the environmental cost of conventional plastics is projected to exceed $500 billion annually in terms of ecosystem damage and cleanup efforts by 2040 [24].

Bioplastics emerge as a viable alternative to conventional plastics, offering potential environmental benefits through their biodegradability and renewable resource base (Table 1). Unlike traditional plastics, bioplastics are derived from plant-based or microbial sources, and can be categorized into biodegradable and bio- based types [25]. Biodegradable plastics, which adhere to standards like EN 13432:2000, must decompose into carbon dioxide and water within six months under industrial composting conditions, with at least 90% of the material undergoing transformation [26]. Bio-based plastics, although produced from renewable sources, do not necessarily decompose easily [27] despite their.

Table 1:Comparative Analysis of Conventional Plastics and Bioplastics [24].

Classification and production pathways of bioplastics

Bioplastics are a versatile group of materials distinguished by their sources (Figure 1) and production methods. Starch-based bioplastics, derived from crops such as maize, potatoes, and corn, were among the first bioplastics developed [28]. These materials utilize the natural polymer starch as their primary component and decompose through microbial action [29]. However, their advantages, such as reduced carbon footprint and the potential to alleviate waste management issues, bioplastics face challenges including higher costs and varying degradation rates [30]. Nonetheless, transitioning to bioplastics could potentially reduce the annual production of around 300 million metric tons of conventional plastics by up to 50% [31], leading to a significant decrease in environmental pollution and waste management costs over the next decade.

Figure 1:Types of Bioplastics minor modified from [35].

practical use is often limited by their physical properties, such as brittleness and limited thermal stability, and their environmental impact is compromised as about 25% of these bioplastics do not fully degrade [32]. This incomplete degradation can leave behind non-degradable residues that may contribute to soil pollution and affect soil health [33]. On the other hand, cellulose-based bioplastics, including organic cellulose esters and regenerated cellulose, are produced from natural fibers such as cotton and wood pulp [34]. Regenerated cellulose, which uses over 60% of global chemical-grade pulp, is appreciated for its biodegradability and mechanical properties, such as flexibility and strength [35]. The global market for cellulose-based bioplastics is significant, reaching approximately $2 billion annually [36], reflecting their widespread use in applications like film and packaging materials. Advanced bioplastics such as Polylactic Acid (PLA) and Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) offer improved performance and environmental benefits compared to earlier types. PLA is synthesized from plant starches through microbial fermentation processes, which convert carbohydrates into lactic acid, which is then polymerized to form PLA [37]. This process not only results in a material that exhibits high rigidity and stability but also significantly reduces energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, with PLA using about 30% less energy and emitting 70% fewer greenhouse gases than conventional plastics [38]. The global market capacity for PLA is around 3 million metric tons annually, underscoring its growing popularity [38].

PHA-based bioplastics, produced by bacterial fermentation of organic substrates, are notable for their full biodegradability within a year [39]. These bioplastics are utilized in a wide range of applications, including medical devices and packaging, with the global PHA market projected to reach $1.5 billion by 2025 [40]. Additionally, drop- in bioplastics such as bio-polyethylene (PE) and bio-polypropylene (PP) are chemically identical to their fossil fuel-based counterparts but are derived from renewable resources [41]. These materials constitute about 10% of the bioplastics market. Lastly, fossil fuel-based bioplastics like polybutyrate adipate terephthalate (PBAT) combine petrochemical elements with biodegradable components, offering both flexibility and rapid decomposition [42]. The PBAT market is expanding, with a projected compound annual growth rate of 7% over the next decade, highlighting its growing relevance in the bioplastics sector.

The production pathways of bioplastics showcase a range of methods tailored to their raw materials and desired properties (Table 2). A key pathway is the polymerization of bio-monomers from renewable sources, exemplified by Polylactic Acid (PLA) [43]. PLA is produced through a two-step process: First, carbohydrates from plant sources like corn starch are fermented to yield lactic acid, which is then polymerized into PLA [44]. This method not only utilizes renewable resources but also markedly reduces the carbon footprint, with PLA demonstrating a 30% reduction in energy consumption and a 70% decrease in greenhouse gas emissions compared to conventional plastics [45]. Another significant pathway involves the chemical modification of natural polymers, such as cellulose [46]. Cellulose, derived from cotton or wood pulp, undergoes processes like acetylation to produce enhanced materials such as cellulose acetate [47]. This modification improves flexibility, durability, and application versatility, contributing to a $2 billion global market for cellulose-based bioplastics [48]. Collectively, these advancements highlight a substantial shift toward sustainable practices, with bioplastics increasingly offering both environmental and functional benefits.

Table 2:Overview of Bioplastic Types, Production Methods, and Market Trends.

Bioplastic waste management: Recycling, composting, and energy recovery

Bioplastics, derived from renewable resources like plants or microbes, present various waste management options including reuse, mechanical recycling, chemical recycling, organic recycling, and energy recovery. The waste hierarchy prioritizes reduction, reuse, and recycling, promoting sustainable treatment and disposal practices [49]. Bioplastics, when mixed with conventional plastics in municipal waste, complicate recycling systems due to their varied base materials. Nevertheless, bioplastics have substantial potential for composting [50]. Biodegradable bioplastics, adhering to standards such as EN 13432:2000, decompose into simpler compounds like carbon dioxide and water under aerobic conditions [51]. For instance, PLA foam can fully decompose within two weeks in composting conditions at temperatures above 60 °C [52]. This contrasts with conventional plastics, which can persist in landfills for hundreds of years, contributing to long-term environmental degradation [53]. Composting bioplastics not only reduces landfill waste but also generates valuable organic compost, enhancing soil health and plant growth, thus offering a significant environmental benefit.

Recycling is crucial for the sustainable management of bioplastics, with mechanical, chemical, and organic recycling methods all playing important roles. Mechanical recycling involves reprocessing bioplastics into new products through processes like washing, density separation, and compounding [54]. Although effective, this method is economically challenging due to the inconsistent supply of bioplastic waste, which represents only about 1% of the total plastic waste [55]. Bioplastics like biobased polyethylene (PE) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) can be recycled within their respective streams, enhancing overall recycling rates [56]. Chemical recycling, or feedstock recycling, involves breaking down biopolymers into chemical building blocks or new products, such as converting PLA into lactic acid, which can then be used to produce new PLA items [57]. This method is employed in countries such as Belgium and the USA. Energy recovery from bioplastics includes anaerobic digestion and incineration [58]. Anaerobic digestion can convert bioplastics into biogas and digestate, providing renewable energy and organic manure, with potential for generating up to 300 cubic meters of biogas per ton of waste [59]. Incineration, despite emitting carbon dioxide, recovers energy and is viable for bioplastics with high calorific values [60]. The global bioplastics market is experiencing rapid growth, with a projected increase from 2.05 million tons in 2017 to 2.44 million tons by 2022, reflecting a growth rate of 20-25% annually [61]. This expansion is driven by increasing environmental awareness, regulatory support, and technological advancements, with drop-in bio-based plastics dominating the market, particularly in packaging, which constitutes 60% of global bioplastics production.

Role of bioplastics in sustainability and future

Bioplastics are poised to play a transformative role in advancing sustainability and addressing pressing environmental challenges (Figure 2). As the world contends with the adverse effects of conventional plastics on ecosystems and human health, bioplastics emerge as a viable alternative that can reduce dependence on fossil fuels, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and alleviate the plastic waste crisis [62]. Derived from renewable resources such as plants and microorganisms, bioplastics offer significant environmental benefits, including reduced carbon footprints and enhanced biodegradability [63,64]. Advances in bioplastic technology aim to develop materials with improved mechanical properties and greater versatility for applications ranging from packaging to agriculture [61]. As innovation in this field continues, bioplastics are expected to integrate more effectively into circular economy models, where they contribute not only to waste reduction but also to the regeneration of natural resources [62], supporting SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Figure 2:Bioplastics and their role in Sustainability major modified from [62].

Looking ahead, the role of bioplastics in promoting sustainability extends to driving economic growth and fostering sustainable development. The global bioplastics market, projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 20% in the coming years, reflects increasing consumer and regulatory demand for ecofriendly alternatives [63]. Investments in research and development are anticipated to further enhance the performance and costeffectiveness of bioplastics, making them more competitive with traditional plastics [65,66]. Additionally, bioplastics support SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) through advancements in production technologies and SDG 15 [67] by reducing land degradation and pollution [67]. As bioplastics gain wider adoption and are integrated into effective waste management systems, they offer a pathway to reducing the environmental impact of various sectors, contributing to a more sustainable and resilient future.

This review examines how bioplastics contribute to sustainable waste management and environmental impact reduction, drawing insights from recent studies published in leading journals. The key findings are as follows:
A. Bioplastics like PLA significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions by up to 70% and energy consumption by 30% compared to conventional plastics, offering notable environmental advantages despite challenges like higher costs and variable degradation rates.
B. Advanced bioplastics, such as PLA and PHA, show improved performance with PLA reducing energy use by 30% and having a market capacity of around 3 million metric tons annually, while PHA’s full biodegradability underscores their growing market importance.
C. Bioplastics, with options like composting and recycling, can greatly reduce environmental impact. PLA, for example, can decompose fully in composting conditions within two weeks, offering a clear advantage over conventional plastics that last for centuries.
D. The rising adoption of bioplastics, supported by technological advances and growing market demand, can significantly reduce fossil fuel dependence and environmental pollution. The bioplastics market is expected to grow at over 20% CAGR, highlighting their potential to enhance sustainability.

The insights underscore the transformative potential of bioplastics in advancing sustainability. Embracing bioplastics can revolutionize our approach to material use, from everyday packaging to industrial applications. However, overcoming obstacles like higher production costs and varied degradation rates requires ongoing innovation and strategic implementation. By addressing these challenges through cutting-edge research and practical solutions, we can unlock the full potential of bioplastics and drive meaningful progress toward a more sustainable future.

Not Applicable.

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with this publication.

The authors extend their gratitude to all individuals and departments that contributed to this literature research.

1. Álvarez CCR, Edwards S, Moure Eraso R, Geiser K (2012) Sustainability of bio- based plastics: General comparative analysis and recommendations for improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production 23(1): 47-56.
2. Abrha H, Cabrera J, Dai Y, Irfan M, Toma A, et al. (2022) Bio-based plastics production, impact, and end of life: A literature review and content analysis. Sustainability 14(8): 4855.
3. Alaerts L, Augustinus M, Van Acker K (2018) Impact of bio-based plastics on current recycling of plastics. Sustainability 10(5): 1487.
4. Aziz T, Farid A, Haq F, Kiran M, Ullah A, et al. (2022) A review on the modification of cellulose and its applications. Polymers 14(15): 3206.
5. Ali SS, Abdelkarim EA, Elsamahy T, Al Tohamy R, Li F, et al. (2023) Bioplastic production in terms of life cycle assessment: A state-of-the-art review. Environmental Science & Ecotechnology 15: 100254.
6. Brebu M (2020) Environmental degradation of plastic composites with natural fillers-A review. Polymers 12(1): 166.
7. Celletti S, Fedeli R, Ghorbani M, Loppi S (2023) Impact of starch-based bioplastic on growth and biochemical parameters of basil plants. Science of the Total Environment 856(Pt 2): 159163.
8. Cabrera G, Li J, Maazouz A, Lamnawar K (2022) A journey from processing to recycling of multilayer waste films: A review of main challenges and prospects. Polymers 14(12): 2319.
9. Chen L, Pelton RE, Smith TM (2016) Comparative life cycle assessment of fossil and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles. Journal of Cleaner Production 137: 667-676.
10. Di Bartolo A, Infurna G, Dintcheva NT (2021) A review of bioplastics and their adoption in the circular economy. Polymers 13(8): 1229.
11. Dijkstra H, Van Beukering P, Brouwer R (2020) Business models and sustainable plastic management: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production 258: 120967.
12. Emadian SM, Onay TT, Demirel B (2017) Biodegradation of bioplastics in natural environments. Waste Management 59: 526-536.
13. Eissenberger K, Ballesteros A, De Bisschop R, Bugnicourt E, Cinelli P, et al. (2023) Approaches in sustainable, biobased multilayer packaging solutions. Polymers(Basel) 15(5): 1184.
14. Falua KJ, Pokharel A, Babaei GA, Ai Y, Acharya B (2022) Valorization of starch to biobased materials: A review. Polymers 14(11): 2215.
15. Fernandez BG, Pavez P (2022) Novel production methods of polyhydroxyalkanoates and their innovative uses in biomedicine and industry. Molecules 27(23): 8351.
16. Folino A, Karageorgiou A, Calabrò PS, Komilis D (2020) Biodegradation of wasted bioplastics in natural and industrial environments: A review. Sustainability 12(15): 6030.
17. Faba S, Arrieta MP, Agüero Á, Torres A, Romero J, et al. (2022) Processing compostable PLA/organoclay bionanocomposite foams by supercritical CO2 foaming for sustainable food packaging. Polymers(Basel) 14(20): 4394.
18. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL (2017) Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances 3(7): e1700782.
19. Hobbs SR, Harris TM, Barr WJ, Landis AE (2021) Life cycle assessment of bioplastics and food waste disposal methods. Sustainability 13(12): 6894.
20. Hahladakis JN, Velis CA, Weber R, Iacovidou E, Purnell P (2018) An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. Journal of Hazardous Materials 344: 179-199.
21. Hubbe MA, Szlek DB, Vera RE (2022) Detergency mechanisms and cellulosic surfaces: A review. Bio Resources 17(4): 1-47.
22. Habibi Y (2014) Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chemical Society Reviews 43(5): 1519-1542.
23. Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2016) A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Research 91: 156-173.
24. Iles A, Martin AN (2013) Expanding bioplastics production: Sustainable business innovation in the chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 45: 38-49.
25. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Harussani MM, Hakimi MYAY, Haziq MZM, et al. (2021) Polylactic acid(PLA) biocomposite: Processing, additive manufacturing, and advanced applications. Polymers(Basel) 13(8): 1326.
26. Jaffur N, Kumar G, Jeetah P, Ramakrishna S, Bhatia SK (2023) Current advances and emerging trends in sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoate modification from organic waste streams for material applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 234(Pt 2): 126781.
27. Jayarathna S, Andersson M, Andersson R (2022) Recent advances in starch-based blends and composites for bioplastics applications. Polymers(Basel) 14(21): 4557.
28. Jankowska E, Gorman MR, Frischmann CJ (2022) Transforming the plastic production system presents opportunities to tackle the climate crisis. Sustainability 14(11): 1-18.
29. Kumar R, Sadeghi K, Jang J, Seo J (2023) Mechanical, chemical, and bio-recycling of biodegradable plastics: A review. Science of the Total Environment 882: 163446.
30. Krueger MC, Harms H, Schlosser D (2015) Prospects for microbiological solutions to environmental pollution with plastics. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 99(21): 8857-8874.
31. Kakadellis S, Harris ZM (2020) Don’t scrap the waste: The need for broader system boundaries in bioplastic food packaging life- cycle assessment–A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production 274: 122831.
32. Li J, Tseng J, Tang D, Yong Y, Sun L, et al. (2024) Upcycling C1 gas-derived resources in future food systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 210: 107827.
33. Lambert S, Wagner M (2017) Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: The road ahead. Chemical Society Reviews 46(22): 6855-6871.
34. Lackner M, Mukherjee A, Koller M (2023) What are “bioplastics”? Defining renewability, biosynthesis, biodegradability, and biocompatibility. Polymers 15(24): 4695.
35. Leal FW, Barbir J, Özuyar PG, Nunez E, Diaz SJM, et al. (2022) Assessing provisions and requirements for the sustainable production of plastics: Towards achieving SDG 12 from the consumers’ perspective. Sustainability 14(24): 16542.
36. Meereboer KW, Misra M, Mohanty AK (2020) Review of recent advances in the biodegradability of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) bioplastics and their composites. Green Chemistry 22(17): 5519-5558.
37. Martin GM, Allegue LD, Puyol D, Melero JA, Dufour J (2023) Environmental life cycle assessment of polyhydroxyalkanoates production by purple phototrophic bacteria mixed cultures. Journal of Cleaner Production 428: 139421.
38. Merchan AL, Fischöder T, Hee J, Lehnertz MS, Osterthun O, et al. (2022) Chemical recycling of bioplastics: Technical opportunities to preserve chemical functionality as path towards a circular economy. Green Chemistry 24(24): 9428-9449.
39. Nam JY, Kim SK, Ghosh S, Kim CJ, Park MB (2023) Development of biodegradable composite films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals for packaging applications. Polymers 15: 2142.
40. Nanda S, Patra BR, Patel R, Bakos J, Dalai AK (2022) Innovations in applications and prospects of bioplastics and biopolymers: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 20(1): 379-395.
41. Narayanasamy A, Patel SK, Singh N, Rohit MV, Lee JK (2024) Valorization of algal biomass to produce microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates: Recent updates, challenges, and perspectives. Polymers 16(15): 2227.
42. Nanda N, Bharadvaja N (2022) Algal bioplastics: Current market trends and technical aspects. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 24(9): 2659-2679.
43. Narancic T, Cerrone F, Beagan N, O’Connor KE (2020) Recent advances in bioplastics: Application and biodegradation. Polymers 12(4): 920.
44. Naser AZ, Deiab I, Defersha F, Yang S (2021) Expanding poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) applications: A review on modifications and effects. Polymers(Basel) 13(23): 4271.
45. Nandakumar A, Chuah JA, Sudesh K (2021) Bioplastics: A boon or bane? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 147: 111237.
46. Okoffo ED, Donner E, McGrath SP, Tscharke BJ, O'Brien JW, et al. (2021) Plastics in biosolids from 1950 to 2016: A function of global plastic production and consumption. Water Research 201: 117367.
47. Ogunola OS, Onada OA, Falaye AE (2018) Mitigation measures to avert the impacts of plastics and microplastics in the marine environment: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25(10): 9293-9310.
48. Pimentel D (2006) Soil erosion: A food and environmental threat. Environment, Development and Sustainability 8: 119-137.
49. Paletta A, Leal FW, Balogun AL, Foschi E, Bonoli A (2019) Barriers and challenges to plastics valorisation in the context of a circular economy: Case studies from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production 241: 118149.
50. Paul S, Sen B, Das S, Abbas SJ, Pradhan SN, et al. (2023) Incarnation of bioplastics: Recuperation of plastic pollution. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 103(19): 8217-8240.
51. Rosenboom JG, Langer R, Traverso G (2022) Bioplastics for a circular economy. Nature Reviews Materials 7(2): 117-137.
52. Rahman MH, Bhoi PR (2021) An overview of non-biodegradable bioplastics. Journal of Cleaner Production 294: 126218.
53. Rujnić SM, Pilipović A (2017) Challenges and opportunities of biodegradable plastics: A mini review. Waste Management & Research 35(2): 132-140.
54. Righetti GIC, Faedi F, Famulari A (2024) Embracing sustainability: The world of bio-based polymers in a mini review. Polymers(Basel) 16(7): 950.
55. Sharma S, Sharma V, Chatterjee S (2023) Contribution of plastic and microplastic to global climate change and their conjoining impacts on the environment-A review. Science of the Total Environment 875: 162627.
56. Swetha TA, Bora A, Mohanrasu K, Balaji P, Raja R, et al. (2023) A comprehensive review on polylactic acid (PLA)–synthesis, processing, and application in food packaging. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 234: 123715.
57. Steinmetz Z, Wollmann C, Schaefer M, Buchmann C, David J, et al. (2016) Plastic mulching in agriculture: Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation? Science of the Total Environment 550: 690-705.
58. Tsapekos P, Khoshnevisan B, Alvarado MM, Zhu X, Pan J, et al. (2021) Upcycling the anaerobic digestion streams in a bioeconomy approach: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 151: 111635.
59. Taghavi N, Udugama IA, Zhuang WQ, Baroutian S (2021) Challenges in biodegradation of non-degradable thermoplastic waste: From environmental impact to operational readiness. Biotechnology Advances 49: 107731.
60. Van Roijen EC, Miller SA (2022) A review of bioplastics at end-of-life: Linking experimental biodegradation studies and life cycle impact assessments. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 181: 106236.
61. Verma SK, Prasad A, Katiyar V (2023) State of art review on sustainable biodegradable polymers with a market overview for sustainability packaging. Materials Today: Communications 36: 106135.
62. Van Ewijk S, Stegemann JA (2016) Limitations of the waste hierarchy for achieving absolute reductions in material throughput. Journal of Cleaner Production 132: 122-128.
63. Wang S, Lu A, Zhang L (2016) Recent advances in regenerated cellulose materials. Progress in Polymer Science 53: 169-206.
64. Wojnowska BI, Kulikowska D, Bernat K (2020) Effect of bio-based products on waste management. Sustainability 12(5): 2088.
65. Zhao X, Cornish K, Vodovotz Y (2020) Narrowing the gap for bioplastic use in food packaging: An update. Environmental Science & Technology 54(8): 4712-4732.
66. Zupančič M, Možic V, Može M, Cimerman F, Golobič I (2022) Current status and review of waste-to-biogas conversion for selected European countries and worldwide. Sustainability 14(3): 1823.
67. Zimmermann L, Dombrowski A, Völker C, Wagner M (2020) Are bioplastics and plant-based materials safer than conventional plastics? In vitro toxicity and chemical composition. Environmental International 145: 106066.