Crimson Publishers Publish With Us Reprints e-Books Video articles

Full Text

Examines in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Open Access

The Use of PAPE to Enhance Sports Performance

Arthur Zecchin1,2*

1Assistant Professor, Physical Education Department, Estacio University Center, Brazil

2School of Physical Education and Sport – University of São Paulo, Brazil

*Corresponding author:Arthur Zecchin, Assistant Professor, Physical Education Department, Estacio University Center, Ribeirão Preto and School of Physical Education and Sport – University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil

Submission: April 09, 2025;Published: April 16, 2025

DOI: 10.31031/EPMR.2025.05.000613

ISSN 2637-7934
Volume5 Issue3

Introduction

In the last years the Post-Activation Performance Enhancement (PAPE) has gained attention in the scientific community. Basically, the PAPE refers to the temporary improvement in muscle performance following a conditioning activity, usually involving a high-intensity or maximal contraction. The phenomenon is often utilized in sports training to enhance strength, power and speed during subsequent activities (e.g., weight throw; Olympic weightlifting). PAPE differs from Post-Activation Potentiation (PAP) in that PAPE is more related on performance improvements over a longer period (several minutes) rather than immediate neural excitability changes [1]. The mechanism of PAPE is based basically in three principles:
i) Increased muscle temperature that means conditioning exercises increase muscle temperature, leading to enhanced metabolic reactions, increased muscle fiber conduction velocity, and improved force output;
ii) Increased muscle and tendon stiffness that is explained by the contractile elements within the muscle turns more efficient by better force transmission, improving power output;
iii) Enhanced muscle activation and calcium sensitivity that means heavy contractions increase the sensitivity of muscle fibers to calcium, leading to greater force production in subsequent movements (myosin light chain phosphorylation) [2-4].

Earlier, the time window for PAPE was described and it showed to be dependent of innumerous factors such as athletes’ training level, type of conditioning exercise, intensity exercise, rest intervals, etc., [5]. The peak PAPE effects typically last between 3 to 10 minutes after the conditioning activity [6,7]. In some cases, the benefits of PAPE may endure up to 12 minutes, especially in well trained athletes [8]. More recently, Kasicki et al. [9] described in their systematic review study the only short term positive effects of PAPE. Other recent study, a systematic review and meta-analysis) showed improvement of PAPE lasting 8-12 minutes when the condition activity was heavy (≥ 80% one repetition maximum) for ballistic upper movement, and 3 minutes when the weight was implemented in weight throw before the competition (by ~1.7-8.5%) [10]. These studies rely on the importance of use high-intensity condition activity to generate longer PAPE. Overall, the studies relating to understand the intensity of the condition activity to generate PAPE demonstrate that intensity from 60- 87% one repetition maximum (bench press) and 85-90% (back squat) may generate PAPE in selective sports such as rugby, artial marts, sprinters, soccer, basketball, track and field athletics [11-16].

Although the research about PAPE has been explored in different condition activities and individuals, the exactly mechanisms of the potentiation remain unclear and the individualized approaches in the application of PAPE. Moreover, while PAPE shows promise in enhancing performance across various sports, its effectiveness may be inconsistent, necessitating tailored approaches for individual athletes and specific sports contexts. A proper balance between fatigue and potentiation is crucial for optimal results. Here, is proposed the term for PAPE, “What does not fatigue tends to become more potentiated”.

References

  1. Boullosa D, Beato M, Iacono AD, Cuenca-Fernández F, Doma K, et al. (2020) A new taxonomy for postactivation potentiation in sport. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 15(8): 1197-1200.
  2. McGowan CJ, Pyne DB, Thompson KG, Rattray B (2015) Warm-up strategies for sport and exercise: Mechanisms and applications. Sports Med 45(11): 1523-1546.
  3. Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T (2002) Effect of stretching training on the viscoelastic properties of human tendon structures in vivo. J Appl Physiol 92(2): 595-601.
  4. Boullosa D, Del Rosso S, Behm DG, Foster C (2018) Post-Activation Potentiation (PAP) in endurance sports: A review. European Journal of Sport Science 18(5): 595-610.
  5. Wilson JM, Duncan NM, Marin PJ, Brown LE, Loenneke JP, et al. (2013) Meta-analysis of postactivation potentiation and power: Effects of conditioning activity, volume, gender, rest periods, and training status. J Strength Cond Res 27(3): 854-859.
  6. Tillin NA, Bishop D (2009) Factors modulating post-activation potentiation and its effect on performance of subsequent explosive activities. Sports Med 39(2): 147-166.
  7. Seitz LB, Haff GG (2016) Factors modulating post-activation potentiation of jump, sprint, throw, and upper-body ballistic performances: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med 46(2): 231-240.
  8. Esformes J, Keenan M, Moody J, Bampouras T (2011) Effect of different types of conditioning contraction on upper body postactivation potentiation. J Strength Cond Res 25(1): 143-148.
  9. Kasicki K, Rydzik Ł, Ambroży T, Spieszny M, Koteja P (2024) The impact of post-activation performance enhancement protocols on vertical jumps: Systematic review. Applied Sciences 14(21): 9664.
  10. Finlay MJ, Bridge CA, Greig M, Page RM (2022) Upper-body post-activation performance enhancement for athletic performance: A systematic review with meta-analysis and recommendations for future research. Sports Med 52(4): 847-871.
  11. West D, Cunningham D, Crewther B, Cook C, Kilduff L (2013) Influence of ballistic bench press on upper body power output in professional rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 27(8): 2282-2287.
  12. Liossis LD, Forsyth J, Liossis C, Tsolakis C (2013) The acute effect of upper-body complex training on power output of martial art athletes as measured by the bench press throw exercise. J Hum Kinet 39: 167-175.
  13. Marquez E, Castillo D, Rodriguez-Fernandez A, Beato M, Raya-Gonzalez J (2023) The post-activation performance enhancement effect of a parallel back squat on male jumping and sprinting athletes. Journal of Men's Health 19(2): 9-16.
  14. Low D, Harsley P, Shaw M, Peart D (2015) The effect of heavy resistance exercise on repeated sprint performance in youth athletes. J Sports Sci 33(10): 1028-1034.
  15. Larson N, Gates T, Faigenbaum A (2003) Acute effects of plyometric exercise on maximum squat performance in male athletes. J Strength Cond Res 17(1): 68-71.
  16. Güllich S, Schmidtbleicher D (1996) MVC-Induced short-term potentiation of explosive force. New Studies in Athletics 4(11): 67-81.

© 2025 Arthur Zecchin. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.

About Crimson

We at Crimson Publishing are a group of people with a combined passion for science and research, who wants to bring to the world a unified platform where all scientific know-how is available read more...

Leave a comment

Contact Info

  • Crimson Publishers, LLC
  • 260 Madison Ave, 8th Floor
  •     New York, NY 10016, USA
  • +1 (929) 600-8049
  • +1 (929) 447-1137
  • info@crimsonpublishers.com
  • www.crimsonpublishers.com