Crimson Publishers Publish With Us Reprints e-Books Video articles

Full Text

Cohesive Journal of Microbiology & Infectious Disease

Microbial Imbalance as a Roadblock to Longevity: A Review

Chakrabarti SK1* and Chattopadhyay D1,2

1H P Ghosh Research Center, India

2Sister Nivedita University, India

*Corresponding author: Swarup K Chakrabarti, H P Ghosh Research Center, HIDCO (II), EK Tower, New Town, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Submission: June 12, 2025;Published: July 11, 2025

DOI: 10.31031/CJMI.2025.07.000670

ISSN 2578-0190
Volume7 issues 4

Abstract

Aging is influenced by a combination of genetic, metabolic, environmental, and social factors. The gut microbiome has recently been recognized as an active and modifiable factor of human health span and longevity. Once considered a passive entity, the microbiome is now understood to play a crucial role in immune, metabolic, and cognitive functions-areas that are particularly vulnerable to the aging process. This review examines recent findings indicating that microbial dysbiosis-characterized by reduced diversity and the loss of beneficial species-not only results from aging but also actively contributes to agerelated physiological decline. Epigenetic reprogramming is impacted by changes in microbial balance, which also disrupt systemic signalling pathways (such as gut-brain and gut-heart) and cause chronic inflammation, or “inflammaging.” Age-related phenotypes can be improved by restoring microbial equilibrium by dietary treatments, gut-centric probiotics, or fecal microbiota transplantation, according to research from both human and animal models. Metagenomic and metabolomic profiling-based precision microbiome techniques are being developed to enable tailored treatments. However, there are still issues with population heterogeneity, standardizing procedures, and establishing causality. Together, a promising and underexplored therapeutic target in geroscience is the gut microbiota. The ability to modulate microbial populations may greatly extend life expectancy and prevent age-related illnesses, offering a groundbreaking approach to encouraging healthy aging.

Keywords: Gut microbiome; Aging; Dysbiosis; Healthspan; Inflammaging; Geroscience

Introduction

In the past, research aimed at comprehending and enhancing human lifespan has concentrated on genetic, metabolic, and environmental factors associated with aging, alongside significant social determinants of health such as Socio-Economic Status (SES), dietary quality, and healthcare access [1-5]. Although these elements continue to be crucial, new studies emphasize the gut microbiome as a significant and modifiable factor impacting healthspan-a vital component influencing human longevity [6-10]. This vibrant and diverse microbial community is vital for maintaining immune homeostasis, metabolic equilibrium, and cognitive capabilities-key physiological functions that are especially vulnerable to the impacts of aging [11-13]. Microbial dysbiosis-characterized by reduced diversity and the loss of beneficial microorganisms-has recently been identified as a significant factor contributing to age-related deterioration, receiving growing acknowledgment from researchers [14-17]. It impacts several hallmarks of aging, such as genomic instability, the shortening of telomeres, dysfunction of mitochondria, and the loss of proteostasis, thereby amplifying its far-reaching influence on the aging process [18-20]. Additionally, dysbiosis, which is characterized by diminished microbial diversity, a reduction in commensal and beneficial species, and an increase in opportunistic pathobionts, contributes to the persistence of a chronic, lowgrade inflammatory state known as inflammaging, which is significant in various age-related conditions, including Neurodegenerative Diseases (NDs), metabolic disorders, and immune dysregulation [21-25]. Disrupting the interconnected systems associated with the hallmarks of aging, dysbiosis diminishes physiological resilience, hastens the decline of healthspan, and obstructs the compression of morbidityultimately leading to a shortened lifespan [14-16,26,27]. As awareness of the gut microbiome’s function as a crucial regulator of systemic aging increases, its significant potential as a target for therapies aimed at fostering healthy aging and preventing agerelated diseases is considerable [28,29].

The Gut Microbiome as a Dynamic Modulator of Host Aging Trajectories

Traditionally viewed as having a passive role, the human gut microbiome is now recognized as an active and crucial regulator of host physiology, influencing a range of biological functions throughout an individual’s life [30,31]. The development of microbial colonization in the gut and the interactions between the host and microbiota start in the womb, shaped by maternal influences such as diet, metabolic health, psychosocial stress, and the transfer of microbial components and metabolites via the placenta [32-34]. Following birth, the gut microbiome continues to develop, influenced by factors like the delivery method (vaginal or cesarean), breastfeeding habits, antibiotic consumption, and early dietary selections [35,36]. Compounds produced by gut microbes from the diet, including Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs) and polyphenol derivatives, are crucial in directing the host’s epigenetic programming, affecting gene expression, and impacting long-term disease susceptibility [37-39]. During childhood, adolescence, and into early adulthood, the gut microbiota generally develops into a state marked by high diversity, metabolic adaptability, and ecological stability [40,41]. It forms the basis for crucial functions that affect and regulate the development of the immune system, uphold the integrity of the intestinal epithelium, hinder the establishment of harmful pathogens in the gut, and aid in maintaining energy balance [42,43]. The stability of microbial communities strengthens the host’s capacity to cope with both internal and external stressors, facilitating the preservation of homeostasis and fostering health during early and midlife stages [44,45].

The gut microbiota, which was once a resilient and varied ecosystem, undergoes changes with aging, a phenomenon referred to as dysbiosis [14-17]. In older individuals, helpful gut bacteria that generate SCFAs, including butyrate-such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and some Roseburia species-are typically diminished, whereas pro-inflammatory members of the Enterobacteriaceae family increase in number [46-48]. The alterations in microbial diversity linked to aging are now understood as significant factors in physiological deterioration, rather than just a byproduct of the aging process [49,50]. Importantly, the gut microbiome that develops with age can affect the host’s epigenetic environment by changing the availability of microbial metabolites-such as SCFAs, folate, and polyamines-which are critical cofactors for epigenetic enzymes like Histone De Acetylases (HDACs) and DNA Methyl Transferases (DNMTs) [51-53]. By influencing DNA methylation patterns, histone Post-Translational Modifications (PTMs), and the expression of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), changes in the gut microbiome associated with aging can lead to long-term epigenetic reprogramming in host cells [54,55]. This process may reinforce dysfunctional cellular states, contributing to the functional decline associated with aging. The ongoing reprogramming of gene expression results in a pro-inflammatory state characterized by a mild but chronic inflammation, referred to as “inflammaging,” which destabilize immune equilibrium and increase susceptibility to various diseases linked to aging [22-25]. Furthermore, metabolites produced by the microbiome, such as polyamines, bile acids, and tryptophan catabolites, influence the host’s aging by affecting crucial nutrient-sensing and longevity pathways like mTOR (Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin), sirtuins, and AMPK (AMP-Activated Protein Kinase) [56,57]. Consequently, the microbiome plays a dual role as both a metabolic integrator and an epigenetic modulator, actively influencing the aging process in response to environmental factors and signals originating from the host [58-60]. The imbalance in the communication between organs mediated by the microbiome increases the likelihood of metabolic disorders and NDs, partly by dysregulating the Gut-Brain Axis (GBA) [61-63]. Additionally, disturbances in the gut-heart axis have been associated with Cardio Vascular Diseases (CVDs) [64-66]. Emerging research indicates that changes in the microbiome may worsen dysfunction in various organ systems through the gut-lung and gut-pancreas-liver pathways, highlighting the widespread effects of microbial imbalance [67-70]. To summarize, changes in the microbiome related to aging have a significant impact on the physiology of the host by both sensing and modulating age-associated biological processes. In essence, functioning as a persistent epigenetic modulator, the microbiome has the ability to alter gene regulatory networks, which increases the host’s vulnerability to various chronic diseases associated with aging.

Microbial Dysbiosis as a Causal Driver of Age- Associated Pathophysiology

Historically, changes in the gut microbiome linked to aging were mainly viewed as effects of natural aging processes and chronic diseases. However, an increasing number of longitudinal studies in humans, along with interventional experiments in animals, suggest that gut dysbiosis serves both as a cause and a consequence, affecting key features of the aging phenotype [30- 71]. Rodent studies suggest that shifts in the composition of gut microbial communities precede the onset of cognitive decline [72], immunosenescence, and metabolic dysfunction-signs of aging [73,74]. Notably, these age-related impairments appear to be at least partially reversible through the restoration of microbial homeostasis [75,76]. Transferring fecal microbiota from younger mice to older ones via a method called Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) has demonstrated the ability to restore the integrity of the intestinal barrier, lower systemic inflammation, stimulate neurogenesis in the hippocampus, and improve cognitive abilities, especially those associated with learning and memory [77-82]. Notably, these results are relevant beyond just preclinical studies. In human observational studies, certain microbial profilessuch as a decrease in the quantity of SCFA-producing bacteria (for instance, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Roseburia spp.) alongside an increase in pro-inflammatory pathobionts (like Enterobacteriaceae)-have been strongly linked to age-related issues, including frailty, sarcopenia, systemic inflammation, cognitive decline, and multimorbidity [83-86]. Specifically, gnotobiotic mouse models, which are free from microorganisms and are populated by targeted microbial communities, have produced causal proof for these connections [87-89]. Introducing gut microbiota from elderly or frail human donors to Germ-Free (GF) mice results in signs of inflammaging, increased gut permeability, and neurocognitive deficits in otherwise young hosts, demonstrating that ageassociated microbial profiles are not merely byproducts of host aging but actively contribute to biological decline [48-90].

Research on healthy centenarians, especially those living in longevity hotspots such as Okinawa [91] (Japan) and certain regions of Italy, has uncovered specific microbial patterns that correlate with the maintenance of physiological function in older age [92-94]. These individuals generally exhibit a high presence of SCFA-producing and anti-inflammatory bacterial species like Akkermansia muciniphila, Christensenella, and Bifidobacterium spp., as well as other unique microbes such as Odoribacter and Subdoligranulum, which are associated with preserving mucosal integrity and immune balance [95-97]. The characteristics associated with the microbiome are thought to contribute to a systemic state of low-grade inflammation and enhanced metabolic robustness, both of which are indicators of healthy aging, marked by preserved physiological functions and a lower incidence of diseases in elderly individuals. Furthermore, studies focusing on older adults have shown that modifying the gut microbiome-through increased consumption of fermentable fibers, diets abundant in polyphenols, or specific probiotic use-can boost microbial diversity, increase the production of SCFAs, improve metabolic indicators, and lower inflammatory markers in the blood [98-100]. Indeed, multiple lines of evidence from observational research, animal model studies, and interventional trials suggest that gut dysbiosis is not simply a byproduct of aging but rather a changeable factor that plays an active role in the decline of physiological function associated with aging [101,102].

Microbiome-Guided Precision Strategies for Promoting Healthy Longevity

In principle, if dysbiosis of the gut microbiome contributes to reduced lifespan, then restoring microbial homeostasis may represent a viable strategy for promoting healthy aging and extending longevity. Nevertheless, restoring the microbiome is not simply about implementing uniform treatments. Conventional probiotic methods have often produced variable results, frequently due to mismatches between strains and hosts, inadequate microbial establishment, or an inability to adapt to an imbalanced gut environment [103,104]. In light of this, new approachessuch as customized probiotics, specific symbiotic, and carefully designed groups of microbes-aim not just to introduce helpful organisms but also to revive the ecological and functional health of the gut microbiota [105,106]. FMT is a valuable approach for refreshing microbial communities, even as its clinical applications are refined [107,108]. Lately, research has concentrated on the direct delivery of metabolites produced by microbes-like SCFAs and tryptophan derivatives-as a method to overcome ecological and engraftment obstacles related to microbiota therapies [109,110]. Moreover, changes in diet that include Mediterranean, high-fiber, or fermented food patterns consistently demonstrate positive effects on the function and makeup of the microbiome in older individuals [111,112]. One of the most promising avenues in aging research involves precision strategies targeting the microbiome, leveraging integrated metagenomic and metabolomic analyses to develop personalized therapeutic interventions [113,114]. Expected progress in wearable biosensors, AI-enhanced analysis of the microbiome, and ongoing assessments of host-microbe interactions-including monitoring microbial composition, immune markers, neuroactive substances, and signaling pathways-could allow for the prompt identification of subclinical dysbiosis and support rapid, customized interventions [115,116].

The Microbiome in Geroscience: Challenges and Future Directions

Recent findings indicate that the gut microbiome serves not just as a marker for biological aging but also plays a role in actively influencing the aging process. Its widespread impacts are facilitated by various microbial metabolites and signaling molecules that affect the functionality and health of distant organs, such as the brain, liver, skeletal muscle, and immune system. Importantly, several of these age-associated alterations appear to be reversible, presenting an opportunity to implement interventions during midlife that may modify the trajectory of aging and mitigate the onset of age-related decline. To realize this potential, we must first address the current obstacles. Specifically, the microbiome profiles associated with longevity may need to assess the presence of Gramnegative bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria release bacterial Lipo Poly Saccharides (LPS) that are toxic to the cell and tissues and can repress anti-aging gene Sirtuin 1 [117]. Plasma LPS levels need to be measured to determine epigenetic programming and microbial balance [118,119]. That being said, determining causality is still difficult; numerous human studies depend on observational data, and there is considerable variability in how individuals respond to the microbiome. Furthermore, having standardized procedures for sample collection, sequencing, and data analysis is crucial. Regulations surrounding microbiome therapies remain nascent, particularly with regard to the elderly demographic. Additionally, there is a need to enhance research on microbiome diversity. Most existing studies are based on samples collected from urban, Western populations. However, the impacts of aging and microbial variations can vary greatly across different socioecological settings. By conducting multi-ethnic research on a global scale, especially among centenarians who demonstrate remarkable health spans, we could gain important insights into the microbial profiles associated with longevity [120-122].

Conclusion

Research on aging is presently witnessing a revival that centers around microbes. As life expectancy increases and age related diseases become more prevalent, the gut microbiota has been identified as a viable and adaptable target for therapeutic approaches-providing both clinical effectiveness and cost efficiency in efforts to support healthy aging. The makeup and functional equilibrium of the gut microbiota are now acknowledged as a key factor influencing the longevity of the host. Considering dysbiosis as an active element-rather than merely a passive consequence-of aging opens up new possibilities for treatment methods in geroscience. By making dietary changes, utilizing specific medications, or altering microbial populations, restoring the balance of gut microbiota could be one of the most underappreciated strategies for reducing age-related deterioration. Increasing evidence indicates that the microbiome can affect systemic aging through immune, metabolic, and neuroepigenetic pathways. In animal models, gut microbiota dysbiosis has been linked to hallmarks of aging, including chronic low-grade inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction, as well as the degradation of intestinal mucosal barrier integrity. Nonetheless, in human studies, many results are still correlational, underscoring the need for longitudinal mechanistic investigations. While interventions aimed at the microbiome show potential, they encounter obstacles due to individual differences and microbial resilience. A personalized medicine approach that integrates host biology, microbial ecosystems, and age-related physiological traits is essential for optimizing therapeutic strategies. Together, although there are existing challenges, the microbiome offers a promising target for improving healthspan, as long as efforts are directed by thorough, translational research.

Funding

This research is supported by Bandhan, Kolkata, India.

Author Contribution

a. Conceptualization: Swarup K. Chakrabarti
b. Formal analysis: Swarup K. Chakrabarti
c. Original draft preparation: Swarup K. Chakrabarti
d. Writing-review and editing: Swarup K Chakrabarti and Dhrubajyoti Chattopadhyay
e. Supervision: Swarup K. Chakrabarti
f. Project administration: Swarup K. Chakrabarti
g. Funding acquisition: Swarup K. Chakrabarti.

References

  1. Castruita PA, Piña ESD, Rentería ME, Yokoyama JS (2022) Genetic, social, and lifestyle drivers of healthy aging and longevity. Curr Genet Med Rep 10(3): 25-34.
  2. Zhang K, Ma Y, Luo Y, Song Y, Xiong G, et al. (2023) Metabolic diseases and healthy aging: Identifying environmental and behavioral risk factors and promoting public health. Front Public Health (11): 1253506.
  3. Chen LK (2025) Social determinants and infrastructures of global longevity societies. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 130: 105723.
  4. Levy SL, Lee SR, Castelyn C, Morrissey MB, Ory MG (2025) Editorial: Social determinants of health for the global aging population in pandemic and disaster environments. Front Public Health 13: 1552408.
  5. Leitão C, Mignano A, Estrela M, Fardilha M, Figueiras A, et al. (2022) The effect of nutrition on aging-a systematic review focusing on aging-related biomarkers. Nutrients 14(3): 554.
  6. Santoro A, Ostan R, Candela M, Biagi E, Brigidi P, et al. (2018) Gut microbiota changes in the extreme decades of human life: A focus on centenarians. Cell Mol Life Sci 75(1): 129-148.
  7. Zeppa SD, Agostini D, Ferrini F, Gervasi M, Barbieri E, et al. (2022) Interventions on gut microbiota for healthy aging. Cells 12(1): 34.
  8. Wilmanski T, Diener C, Rappaport N, Patwardhan S, Wiedrick J, et al. (2021) Gut microbiome pattern reflects healthy ageing and predicts survival in humans. Nat Metab 3(2): 274-286.
  9. Beaver LM, Jamieson PE, Wong CP, Hosseinikia M, Stevens JF, et al. (2025) Promotion of healthy aging through the nexus of gut microbiota and dietary phytochemicals. Adv Nutr 16(3): 100376.
  10. Badal VD, Vaccariello ED, Murray ER, Kasey EYU, Knight R, et al. (2020) The gut microbiome, aging, and longevity: A systematic review. Nutrients 12(12): 3759.
  11. Krishnamurthy HK, Pereira M, Bosco J, George J, Jayaraman V, et al. (2023) Gut commensals and their metabolites in health and disease. Front Microbiol 14: 1244293.
  12. Wu HJ, Wu E (2012) The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity. Gut Microbes 3(1): 4-14.
  13. Khan IM, Nassar N, Chang H, Khan S, Cheng M, et al. (2024) The microbiota: A key regulator of health, productivity, and reproductive success in mammals. Front Microbiol 15: 1480811.
  14. Haran JP, Beth AM (2021) Aging, frailty, and the microbiome-how dysbiosis influences human aging and disease. Gastroenterology 160(2): 507-523.
  15. Korf JM, Ganesh BP, Mccullough LD (2022) Gut dysbiosis and age-related neurological diseases in females. Neurobiol Dis 168: 105695.
  16. Hrncir T (2022) Gut microbiota dysbiosis: Triggers, consequences, diagnostic and therapeutic options. Microorganisms. 10(3): 578.
  17. Bidell MR, Hobbs ALV, Lodise TP (2022) Gut microbiome health and dysbiosis: A clinical primer. Pharmacotherapy 42(11): 849-857.
  18. López OC, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G (2023) Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe. Cell 186(2): 243-278.
  19. Li Y, Berliocchi L, Li Z, Rasmussen LJ (2024) Interactions between mitochondrial dysfunction and other hallmarks of aging: Paving a path toward interventions that promote healthy old age. Aging Cell 23(1): e13942.
  20. Chakravarti D, Labella KA, Depinho RA (2021) Telomeres: History, health, and hallmarks of aging. Cell 184(2): 306-322.
  21. Chandra H, Sharma KK, Tuovinen OH, Sun X, Shukla P (2021) Pathobionts: Mechanisms of survival, expansion, and interaction with host with a focus on Clostridioides difficile. Gut Microbes 13(1): 1979882.
  22. Ferrucci L, Fabbri E (2018) Inflammageing: Chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty. Nat Rev Cardiol 15(9): 505-522.
  23. Kosyreva AM, Sentyabreva AV, Tsvetkov IS, Makarova OV (2022) Alzheimer's disease and inflammaging. Brain Sci 12(9): 1237.
  24. Liu C, Liu T, Zhang Q, Song M, Zhang Q, et al. (2024) Temporal relationship between inflammation and metabolic disorders and their impact on cancer risk. J Glob Health 14: 04041.
  25. Andonian BJ, Hippensteel JA, Abuabara K, Boyle EM, Colbert JF, et al. (2025) Inflammation and aging-related disease: A transdisciplinary inflammaging framework. Geroscience 47(1): 515-542.
  26. Jang DH, Shin JW, Shim E, Ohtani N, Jeon OH (2024) The connection between aging, cellular senescence and gut microbiome alterations: A comprehensive review. Aging Cell 23(10): e14315.
  27. Tartiere AG, Freije JMP, López OC (2024) The hallmarks of aging as a conceptual framework for health and longevity research. Front Aging 5:1334261.
  28. Wang Y, Qu Z, Chu J, Han S (2024) Aging gut microbiome in healthy and unhealthy aging. Aging Dis 16(2): 980-1002.
  29. Ghosh TS, Shanahan F, Paul WOT (2022) The gut microbiome as a modulator of healthy ageing. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 19(9): 565-584.
  30. Thursby E, Juge N (2017) Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem J 474(11): 1823-1836.
  31. Thomas S, Izard J, Walsh E, Batich K, Chongsathidkiet P, et al. (2017) The host microbiome regulates and maintains human health: a primer and perspective for non-microbiologists. Cancer Res 77(8): 1783-1812.
  32. Xiao L, Zhao F (2023) Microbial transmission, colonisation and succession: From pregnancy to infancy. Gut 72(4): 772-786.
  33. Sajdel SEM (2023) The impact of maternal gut microbiota during pregnancy on fetal gut-brain axis development and life-long health outcomes. Microorganisms 11(9): 2199.
  34. Tian M, Li Q, Zheng T, Yang S, Chen F, et al. (2023) Maternal microbe-specific modulation of the offspring microbiome and development during pregnancy and lactation. Gut Microbes 15(1): 2206505.
  35. Zhang C, Li L, Jin B, Xu X, Zuo X, et al. (2021) The effects of delivery mode on the gut microbiota and health: State of art. Front Microbiol 12: 724449.
  36. Pivrncova E, Kotaskova I, Thon V (2022) Neonatal diet and gut microbiome development after c-section during the first three months after birth: A systematic review. Front Nutr 9: 941549.
  37. Reva K, Laranjinha J, Rocha BS (2023) Epigenetic modifications induced by the gut microbiota may result from what we eat: Should we talk about precision diet in health and disease? Metabolites 13(3): 375.
  38. Abdolmaleky HM, Zhou JR (2024) Gut microbiota dysbiosis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and epigenetic alterations in metabolic diseases. Antioxidants (Basel) 13(8): 985.
  39. Guz M, Jeleniewicz W, Malm A, Korona GI (2021) A crosstalk between diet, microbiome and microRNA in epigenetic regulation of colorectal cancer. Nutrients 13(7): 2428.
  40. Carson MD, Westwater C, Novince CM (2023) Adolescence and the microbiome: Implications for healthy growth and maturation. Am J Pathol 193(12): 1900-1909.
  41. Durda MM, Ciomborowska BJ, Makałowska I, Szwed A (2022) The mediating role of the gut microbiota in the physical growth of children. Life (Basel) 12(2): 152.
  42. Di VF, Del GA, Petito V, Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F (2024) Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: A narrativsse review. Intern Emerg Med 19(2): 275-293.
  43. Colella M, Charitos IA, Ballini A, Cafiero C, Topi S, et al. (2023) Microbiota revolution: How gut microbes regulate our lives. World J Gastroenterol 29(28): 4368-4383.
  44. Huang Y, Mukherjee A, Schink S, Benites NC, Basan M (2024) Evolution and stability of complex microbial communities driven by trade-offs. Mol Syst Biol 20(9): 997-1005.
  45. Shade A, Peter H, Allison SD, Baho DL, Berga M, et al. (2012) Fundamentals of microbial community resistance and resilience. Front Microbiol 3: 417.
  46. Fusco W, Lorenzo MB, Cintoni M, Porcari S, Rinninella E, et al. (2023) Short-chain fatty-acid-producing bacteria: Key components of the human gut microbiota. Nutrients 15(9): 2211.
  47. Singh V, Lee G, Son H, Koh H, Kim ES, et al. (2023) Butyrate producers, "the sentinel of gut": Their intestinal significance with and beyond butyrate, and prospective use as microbial therapeutics. Front Microbiol 13: 1103836.
  48. Ragonnaud E, Biragyn A (2021) Gut microbiota as the key controllers of "healthy" aging of elderly people. Immun Ageing 18(1): 2.
  49. Wu YL, Xu J, Rong XY, Wang F, Wang HJ, et al. (2021) Gut microbiota alterations and health status in aging adults: From correlation to causation. Aging Med (Milton) 4(3): 206-213.
  50. Chen LA, Boyle K (2024) The role of the gut microbiome in health and disease in the elderly. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 26(9): 217-230.
  51. Wu Y, Wang CZ, Wan JY, Yao H, Yuan CS (2021) Dissecting the interplay mechanism between epigenetics and gut microbiota: Health maintenance and disease prevention. Int J Mol Sci 22(13): 6933.
  52. Patrizia DA, Carelli LL, De RF, Passarino G, Bellizzi D (2020) Gut microbiota as important mediator between diet and DNa methylation and histone modifications in the host. Nutrients 12(3): 597.
  53. Lin X, Han H, Wang N, Wang C, Qi M, et al. (2024) The Gut microbial regulation of epigenetic modification from a metabolic perspective. Int J Mol Sci 25(13): 7175.
  54. Zhang S, Meng Y, Zhou L, Qiu L, Wang H, et al. (2022) Targeting epigenetic regulators for inflammation: Mechanisms and intervention therapy. MedComm 3(4): e173.
  55. Fellows R, Varga WP (2020) Chromatin dynamics and histone modifications in intestinal microbiota-host crosstalk. Mol Metab 38: 100925.
  56. Wang J, Zhu N, Su X, Gao Y, Yang R (2023) Gut-microbiota-derived metabolites maintain gut and systemic immune homeostasis. Cells 12(5): 793.
  57. Gao Y, Tian T (2023) mTOR signaling pathway and gut microbiota in various disorders: Mechanisms and potential drugs in pharmacotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 24(14): 11811.
  58. Bjedov I, Rallis C (2020) The target of rapamycin signalling pathway in ageing and lifespan regulation. Genes (Basel) 11(9): 1043.
  59. Kim B, Song A, Son A, Shin Y (2024) Gut microbiota and epigenetic choreography: Implications for human health: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 103(29): e39051.
  60. Amatullah H, Jeffrey KL (2020) Epigenome-metabolome-microbiome axis in health and IBD. Curr Opin Microbiol 56: 97-108.
  61. Kearns R (2024) Gut-brain axis and neuroinflammation: The role of gut permeability and the kynurenine pathway in neurological disorders. Cell Mol Neurobiol 44(1): 64.
  62. Mitrea L, Nemeş SA, Szabo K, Teleky BE, Vodnar DC (2022) Guts imbalance imbalances the brain: A review of gut microbiota association with neurological and psychiatric disorders. Front Med (Lausanne) 9: 813204.
  63. Singh A, Dawson TM, Kulkarni S (2021) Neurodegenerative disorders and gut-brain interactions. J Clin Invest 131(13): e143775.
  64. Shariff S, Huey AKS, Soni NP, Yahia A, Hammoud D, et al. (2024) Unlocking the gut-heart axis: Exploring the role of gut microbiota in cardiovascular health and disease. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 86(5): 2752-2758.
  65. Majumder S, Makwana RK, Shetty V, Mukherjee S, Narayan P (2024) Cardiovascular diseases and the heart-gut cross talk. Indian Heart J 76(2): 94-100.
  66. Rivera K, Gonzalez L, Bravo L, Manjarres L, Andia ME (2024) The gut-heart axis: Molecular perspectives and implications for myocardial infarction. Int J Mol Sci 25(22): 12465.
  67. Druszczynska M, Sadowska B, Kulesza J, Gąsienica GN, Kulesza E, et al. (2024) The intriguing connection between the gut and lung microbiomes. Pathogens 13(11): 1005.
  68. Enaud R, Prevel R, Ciarlo E, Beaufils F, Wieërs G, et al. (2020) The gut-lung axis in health and respiratory diseases: A place for inter-organ and inter-kingdom crosstalks. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10: 9.
  69. Marroncini G, Naldi L, Martinelli S, Amedei A (2024) Gut-liver-pancreas axis crosstalk in health and disease: From the role of microbial metabolites to innovative microbiota manipulating strategies. Biomedicines 12(7): 1398.
  70. Svegliati BG, Patrício B, Lioci G, Macedo MP, Gastaldelli A (2020) Gut-pancreas-liver axis as a target for treatment of NAFLD/NASH. Int J Mol Sci 21(16): 5820.
  71. Kandpal M, Indari O, Baral B, Jakhmola S, Tiwari D, et al. (2022) Dysbiosis of gut microbiota from the perspective of the gut-brain axis: Role in the provocation of neurological disorders. Metabolites 12(11): 1064.
  72. Xiao Y, Feng Y, Zhao J, Chen W, Lu W (2025) Achieving healthy aging through gut microbiota-directed dietary intervention: Focusing on microbial biomarkers and host mechanisms. J Adv Res 68: 179-200.
  73. Li Y, Ning L, Yin Y, Wang R, Zhang Z, et al. (2020) Age-related shifts in gut microbiota contribute to cognitive decline in aged rats. Aging (Albany NY) 12(9): 7801-7817.
  74. Madison AA, Kiecolt GJK (2020) The gut microbiota and nervous system: Age-defined and age-defying. Semin Cell Dev Biol 116: 98-107.
  75. Jing Y, Wang Q, Bai F, Li Z, Li Y, et al. (2025) Age-related alterations in gut homeostasis are microbiota dependent. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 11(1): 51.
  76. Xu X, Xu T, Wei J, Chen T (2024) Gut microbiota: An ideal biomarker and intervention strategy for aging. Microbiome Res Rep 3(2): 13.
  77. Parker A, Romano S, Ansorge R, Aboelnour A, Le GG, et al. (2022) Fecal microbiota transfer between young and aged mice reverses hallmarks of the aging gut, eye, and brain. Microbiome 10(1): 68.
  78. Novelle MG, Naranjo MB, López CJL, Díaz RA (2025) Fecal microbiota transplantation, a tool to transfer healthy longevity. Ageing Res Rev 103:102585.
  79. Gulati AS, Nicholson MR, Khoruts A, Kahn SA (2023) Fecal microbiota transplantation across the lifespan: Balancing efficacy, safety, and innovation. Am J Gastroenterol 118(3): 435-439.
  80. Ghani R, Chrysostomou D, Roberts LA, Pandiaraja M, Marchesi JR, et al. (2024) Faecal (or intestinal) microbiota transplant: A tool for repairing the gut microbiome. Gut Microbes 16(1): 2423026.
  81. Dong X, Su Y, Luo Z, Li C, Gao J, et al. (2024) Fecal microbiota transplantation alleviates cognitive impairment by improving gut microbiome composition and barrier function in male rats of traumatic brain injury following gas explosion. Front Microbiol 15: 1485936.
  82. Hediyal TA, Vichitra C, Anand N, Bhaskaran M, Essa SM, et al. (2024) Protective effects of fecal microbiota transplantation against ischemic stroke and other neurological disorders: An update. Front Immunol 15: 1324018.
  83. Islam MM, Mahbub NU, Hong ST, Chung HJ (2024) Gut bacteria: An etiological agent in human pathological conditions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 14: 1291148.
  84. Pickard JM, Zeng MY, Caruso R, Núñez G (2017) Gut microbiota: Role in pathogen colonization, immune responses, and inflammatory disease. Immunol Rev 279(1): 70-89.
  85. Martín R, Rios CD, Huillet E, Auger S, Khazaal S, et al. (2023) Faecalibacterium: A bacterial genus with promising human health applications. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2023 47(4): fuad039.
  86. Xu Y, Wang Y, Li H, Dai Y, Chen D, et al. (2021) Altered fecal microbiota composition in older adults with frailty. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11: 696186.
  87. Leonard LM, Simpson AMR, Li S, Reddivari L, Cross TL (2024) A gnotobiotic mouse model with divergent equol-producing phenotypes: Potential for determining microbial-driven health impacts of soy isoflavone daidzein. Nutrients 16(7): 1079.
  88. Hugenholtz F, Vos DWM (2018) Mouse models for human intestinal microbiota research: A critical evaluation. Cell Mol Life Sci 75(1): 149-160.
  89. Herzog MK, Cazzaniga M, Peters A, Shayya N, Beldi L, et al. (2023) Mouse models for bacterial enteropathogen infections: Insights into the role of colonization resistance. Gut Microbes 15(1): 2172667.
  90. Ye H, Ghosh TS, Hueston CM, Vlckova K, Golubeva AV, et al. (2023) Engraftment of aging-related human gut microbiota and the effect of a seven-species consortium in a pre-clinical model. Gut Microbes 15(2): 2282796.
  91. Hohman LS, Osborne LC (2022) A gut-centric view of aging: Do intestinal epithelial cells contribute to age-associated microbiota changes, inflammaging, and immunosenescence? Aging Cell 21(9): e13700.
  92. Sepp E, Smidt I, Rööp T, Štšepetova J, Kõljalg S, et al. (2022) Comparative analysis of gut microbiota in centenarians and young people: Impact of eating habits and childhood living environment. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12: 851404.
  93. Wu L, Zeng T, Zinellu A, Rubino S, Kelvin DJ, et al. (2019) A cross-sectional study of compositional and functional profiles of gut microbiota in sardinian centenarians. MSystems 4(4): e00325-e00419.
  94. Willcox BJ, Willcox DC, Suzuki M (2017) Demographic, phenotypic, and genetic characteristics of centenarians in Okinawa and Japan: Part 1-centenarians in Okinawa. Mech Ageing Dev 165(Pt B): 75-79.
  95. Effendi RMRA, Anshory M, Kalim H, Dwiyana RF, Suwarsa O, et al. (2022) Akkerman sia muciniphila and faecalibacterium prausnitzii in immune-related diseases. Microorganisms 10(12): 2382.
  96. Gao F, Cheng C, Li R, Chen Z, Tang K, et al. (2025) The role of akkermansia muciniphila in maintaining health: A bibliometric study. Front Med (Lausanne) 12: 1484656.
  97. Ramos Meyers G, Samouda H, Bohn T (2022) Short chain fatty acid metabolism in relation to gut microbiota and genetic variability. Nutrients 14(24): 5361.
  98. Wang X, Qi Y, Zheng H (2022) Dietary polyphenol, gut microbiota, and health benefits. Antioxidants (Basel) 11(6): 1212.
  99. Nemzer BV, Al TF, Kalita D, Yashin AY, Yashin YI (2025) Health-improving effects of polyphenols on the human intestinal microbiota: A review. Int J Mol Sci 2025 26(3): 1335.
  100. Kasprzak DK, Oniszczuk T, Stasiak M, Oniszczuk A (2021) Beneficial effects of phenolic compounds on gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome. Int J Mol Sci 22(7): 3715.
  101. Malik JA, Zafar MA, Lamba T, Nanda S, Khan MA, et al. (2023) The impact of aging-induced gut microbiome dysbiosis on dendritic cells and lung diseases. Gut Microbes 15(2): 2290643.
  102. Hashim HM, Makpol S (2022) A review of the preclinical and clinical studies on the role of the gut microbiome in aging and neurodegenerative diseases and its modulation. Front Cell Neurosci 16: 1007166.
  103. Latif A, Shehzad A, Niazi S, Zahid A, Ashraf W, et al. (2023) Probiotics: Mechanism of action, health benefits and their application in food industries. Front Microbiol 14: 1216674.
  104. Merenstein D, Pot B, Leyer G, Ouwehand AC, Preidis GA, et al. (2023) Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives. Gut Microbes 15(1): 2185034.
  105. Abouelela ME, Helmy YA (2024) Next-generation probiotics as novel therapeutics for improving human health: Current trends and future perspectives. Microorganisms 12(3): 430.
  106. Bhatia A, Sharma D, Mehta J, Kumarasamy V, Begum MY, et al. (2025) Probiotics and synbiotics: Applications, benefits, and mechanisms for the improvement of human and ecological health. J Multidiscip Healthc 18: 1493-1510.
  107. Zikou E, Koliaki C, Makrilakis K (2024) The role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in the management of metabolic diseases in humans: A narrative review. Biomedicines 12(8): 1871.
  108. Karimi M, Shirsalimi N, Hashempour Z, Omran HS, Sedighi E, et al. (2024) Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as a modern adjuvant therapy in various diseases and disorders: A comprehensive literature review. Front Immunol 15: 1439176.
  109. Hitch TCA, Hall LJ, Walsh SK, Leventhal GE, Slack E, et al. (2022) Microbiome-based interventions to modulate gut ecology and the immune system. Mucosal Immunol 15(6): 1095-1113.
  110. Rangan P, Mondino A (2022) Microbial short-chain fatty acids: A strategy to tune adoptive t cell therapy. J Immunother Cancer 10(7): e004147.
  111. Nagpal R, Shively CA, Register TC, Craft S, Yadav H (2019) Gut microbiome-mediterranean diet interactions in improving host health. F1000Res 8: 699.
  112. Merra G, Noce A, Marrone G, Cintoni M, Tarsitano MG, et al. (2020) Influence of mediterranean diet on human gut microbiota. Nutrients 13(1): 7.
  113. Kumar B, Lorusso E, Fosso B, Pesole G (2024) A comprehensive overview of microbiome data in the light of machine learning applications: Categorization, accessibility, and future directions. Front Microbiol 15: 1343572.
  114. Vilne B, Ķibilds J, Siksna I, Lazda I, Valciņa O, et al. (2022) Could artificial intelligence/machine learning and inclusion of diet-gut microbiome interactions improve disease risk prediction? Case study: Coronary artery disease. Front Microbiol 13: 627892.
  115. Zhang S (2023) Editorial: Current development on wearable biosensors towards biomedical applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 11: 1264337.
  116. Ye S, Feng S, Huang L, Bian S (2020) Recent progress in wearable biosensors: From healthcare monitoring to sports analytics. Biosensors (Basel) 10(12): 205.
  117. Ian M (2017) The future of genomic medicine involves the maintenance of sirtuin 1 in global populations. Int J Mol Biol Open Access 2(2): 42-45.
  118. Sharma A, Ian M (2023) The role of microbiota in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Scientific Nutritional Health 7(7): 108-118.
  119. Ian M (2018) Bacterial lipopolysaccharides and neuron toxicity in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurology Research and Surgery 1(1): 1-3.
  120. Rosas PS, Hernández TA, Navarro DM, Escalante AE, Morales ER, et al. (2022) Human gut microbiome across different lifestyles: From hunter-gatherers to urban populations. Front Microbiol 13: 843170.
  121. Gupta VK, Paul S, Dutta C (2017) Geography, ethnicity or subsistence-specific variations in human microbiome composition and diversity. Front Microbiol 8: 1162.
  122. Johnson KV (2020) Gut microbiome composition and diversity are related to human personality traits. Hum Microb J 15: None.

© 2025, Chakrabarti SK. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.

About Crimson

We at Crimson Publishing are a group of people with a combined passion for science and research, who wants to bring to the world a unified platform where all scientific know-how is available read more...

Leave a comment

Contact Info

  • Crimson Publishers, LLC
  • 260 Madison Ave, 8th Floor
  •     New York, NY 10016, USA
  • +1 (929) 600-8049
  • +1 (929) 447-1137
  • info@crimsonpublishers.com
  • www.crimsonpublishers.com