1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Utah Medical School and Primary Childrens Hospital, USA
2Department of Pediatrics, Seoul Saint Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Republic of Korea
3Department of Pediatrics, Center for Pediatric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea
*Corresponding author:Denis R Miller, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Primary Children’s Hospital, 100 Mario Capecchi Dr. Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Submission: August 02, 2024;Published: October 08, 2024
ISSN : 2640-9275Volume3 Issue3
Background: This report provides clinical-pathological and epidemiologic data on four cases of
malignant mesothelioma following prior multimodality therapy, including therapeutic radiation given
for a primary childhood malignancy, including neuroblastoma, malignant mesothelioma, embryonal
rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS), and acute myelomonocytic leukemia (AMML).
Material and Methods: The medical records from the three US patients were reviewed by the senior
author who provided medical testimony for litigation, now resolved. Medical records were reviewed and
summarized by the attending physicians in the Republic of Korea.
Result: The diagnoses of the initial cancers and secondary mesothelioma were confirmed by standard
medical imaging, and histologic and immunohistochemical methods. The latencies were 51 years, 34
years, 36 years, and 17 years respectively after neuroblastoma, childhood metastatic mesothelioma,
embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, and acute myelomonocytic leukemia (AMML). Cases 1, 2, and 3 were
treated with debulking surgery and standard chemoradiotherapy and survived for 12, 13, and 13 months
respectively. All three were exposed para-occupationally and/ or in their households to asbestos. Case
4 received multiagent chemotherapy, whole body radiation, and allogeneic bone marrow transplant for
AMML and standard chemotherapy and surgery for mesothelioma but was never exposed to asbestos.
Conclusion: The relevant epidemiology data on radiation-induced mesothelioma and the lesser
contributory role of household or environmental/occupational exposure to asbestos in Cases 1, 2, and
3 suggest that therapeutic radiation was the primary cause of the secondary malignant mesothelioma
in these three cases. Any additive or synergistic effect of asbestos exposure to therapeutic radiation is
uncertain. The etiology of secondary malignant mesothelioma associated with therapeutic radiation
remains a fertile field of investigation.
Keywords:Malignant mesothelioma; Therapeutic radiation; Chrysotile exposure; Second malignant neoplasm after primary neoplasm in childhood