Transforming Agricultural Residues into Construction Materials: A Sustainable Path Forward

Amid growing environmental concerns and the need for sustainable construction, agro-waste materials present a promising alternative to conventional building resources like cement and steel. This study explores the use of agricultural residues such as rice husk ash, sugarcane bagasse, coconut shells and natural fibers in producing eco-friendly construction components including green concrete, bricks, insulation, particleboards and bio-based plastics. These materials offer benefits like reduced density, improved thermal insulation and sufficient structural performance, while treatments such as alkali washing enhance durability and fire resistance. Artificial Intelligence (AI) further supports this innovation by enabling predictive modelling, life cycle analysis and supply chain optimization. However, challenges persist, including material inconsistency, limited standardization and durability concerns. The study recommends future research on flammability reduction, fungal resistance, and thermodynamic behavior to enhance performance and market readiness. Overall, agro-waste integration in construction contributes to environmental conservation, resource efficiency, and alignment with global sustainability goals.

Keywords:Agro-waste materials; Sustainable construction; Green concrete; Thermal insulation; Artificial intelligence

HighlightsA. Agro-waste such as rice husk ash and bagasse is a viable alternative to traditional construction materials.
B. These materials improve thermal insulation, reduce material density, and support eco-friendly design.
C. AI enhances material optimization, life cycle analysis, and market integration of agro-wastebased components.
D. Challenges include inconsistent material performance, flammability, and lack of standardized processing.
E. Future directions suggest combining waste types, improving treatments, and expanding durability studies.

The construction industry faces increasing pressure to adopt more sustainable practices due to the high environmental costs of conventional materials like cement, steel and aluminum [1]. These materials require immense energy during production and contribute significantly to global carbon emissions [2]. Cement manufacturing alone is responsible for approximately 0.85 tons of CO₂ emissions per ton produced and with a growing global population expected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050 [3], the demand for housing and infrastructure will only escalate, further stressing natural resources and worsening pollution. To mitigate these impacts, there is a growing interest in alternative materials that offer both environmental and economic benefits [4]. Agro-waste, often discarded through landfilling or open burning, has emerged as a promising substitute for traditional building materials [5]. Materials like rice husks, wheat straw and palm kernel shells are being researched for their potential to replace conventional construction materials [6], contributing to both sustainability and reduced environmental damage.

Agricultural waste offers significant potential for promoting sustainability in construction by converting waste into valuable resources [7]. Agro-waste by-products, such as rice husk ash, sugarcane bagasse and coconut shells, can be repurposed as lightweight aggregates, cement alternatives and insulation materials [8]. Studies have demonstrated that these materials meet the necessary structural requirements while offering additional benefits like enhanced thermal insulation and energy efficiency [9]. For instance, rice husk ash and sugarcane bagasse have been found to improve the properties of concrete, providing better strength and durability [10]. Moreover, this approach reduces the environmental impact by diverting large volumes of biomass from landfills and open incineration [11], supporting the circular economy and contributing to responsible resource management. As global efforts to combat climate change intensify [12], incorporating agro-waste into construction helps align with sustainability targets by reducing reliance on non-renewable resources.

The use of agro-waste materials in construction aligns closely with the goals of sustainable development, particularly in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resource efficiency [13]. Researchers and engineers are increasingly exploring how agricultural residues, such as wheat straw, rice husks and cotton stalks, can be utilized to produce eco-friendly and cost-effective building materials [14]. These materials can replace traditional resources like cement and aggregates, which are resource-intensive and contribute to significant environmental degradation [15]. Agro-waste-derived products like bricks, concrete and insulation materials are proving to be not only viable but also efficient in meeting industry standards for thermal performance, strength, and durability [16]. As these innovations develop, agro-waste is positioned to play a critical role in creating environmentally responsible building solutions that reduce construction’s overall ecological footprint [17].

Despite the promising benefits, the widespread adoption of agro-waste in construction still faces several challenges [18]. One key issue is the inconsistency in material performance due to the lack of standardized processing methods, mixing ratios and quality control [19]. Additionally, many agro-waste materials require chemical treatments or specialized processing techniques to enhance their durability and compatibility with other construction materials [20]. For example, treating agro-waste with alkalis or resins is essential to improve fire resistance and strength [21]. These additional steps can increase production costs and energy consumption, limiting the scalability of agro-waste-based materials [22]. Furthermore, the lack of infrastructure for sourcing, processing and distributing agro-waste products remains a significant barrier [23]. Addressing these challenges through further research, technological advancements and industry collaboration will be critical to unlocking the full potential of agro-waste in sustainable construction and ensuring its widespread adoption.

The construction industry is facing mounting pressure to shift toward more sustainable practices due to the high environmental impact of traditional building materials like cement, steel and aluminum [24]. These materials consume large amounts of energy during production and contribute significantly to global carbon emissions cement manufacturing alone emits roughly 0.85 tons of CO₂ per ton produced [25]. With the global population expected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, the demand for housing and infrastructure will only increase, further straining natural resources and escalating pollution [26]. As a result, researchers and engineers are turning to alternative materials that are both eco-friendly and cost-effective [27]. Agricultural waste, often discarded through landfilling or burning has emerged as a promising substitute [28]. Materials such as palm kernel shells, rice husks, and wheat straw are being studied for their potential to replace conventional materials in construction [29], helping to reduce environmental damage while enhancing the sustainability of the industry.

Utilizing agricultural residues in construction presents an effective strategy to promote sustainability by converting waste into valuable resources (Figure 1) [31]. These by-products generated from the cultivation and processing of crops, fruits and livestock can be repurposed as lightweight aggregates, cement alternatives, insulation materials and reinforcement elements [32]. Research has demonstrated that agro-waste like coconut shells and rice husks can meet structural requirements while offering advantages such as improved thermal and acoustic insulation [33]. This approach not only diverts large volumes of biomass from landfills and open incineration but also supports a circular economy [34]. Additionally, integrating agro-waste into construction aligns with global sustainability targets [35], particularly in mitigating climate change and promoting responsible resource use. While there is ongoing competition for agricultural residues in areas such as energy production and organic fertilizers [36], their application in construction is increasingly favored due to the dual benefits of environmental conservation and economic efficiency.

Figure 1:Bio-based construction materials made up of agro waste [30].

The construction industry is increasingly adopting agro-waste to create sustainable materials, reducing environmental impact while enhancing performance [37]. Innovations include bricks and masonry components blended with agricultural residues like rice husk ash (RHA), sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA), and wine wastes [38]. Studies show that adding 5–10% agro-waste to clay bricks lowers density (1,300–1,800 kg/m³), improves porosity (34–49%), and maintains compressive strength (3.3–9.5 MPa), meeting building standards [39]. Advanced kilns, such as vertical shaft brick kilns (VSBK), cut energy use by 29–42% compared to traditional methods [40]. Agro-waste also enhances green concrete: replacing 10% of cement or aggregates with SCBA boosts compressive strength (up to 34 MPa) and reduces costs by 35% [41]. Insulation materials derived from hemp, straw, or rice husk exhibit low thermal conductivity (0.044–0.047W/mK) and improved fire resistance when treated with alkalis or linseed oil [42]. These materials not only reduce reliance on non-renewable resources but also address waste disposal challenges and improve energy efficiency in buildings (Table 1).

Table 1:Applications of Agro-waste Construction Materials and their Key Findings [43].

Agro-waste extends to reinforcement materials, particleboards, and bio-based plastics, broadening its construction applications [44]. Natural fibers like bamboo and rice husk reinforce composites, achieving tensile strengths of up to 15.6 MPa and thermal conductivity as low as 0.156 W/mK. Fiber-reinforced mud bricks stabilize indoor temperatures and meet ASTM compressive standards [45]. Particleboards made from cotton stalks, Khimp shrubs, or sugarcane bagasse with urea-formaldehyde resins achieve densities of 400-600 kg/m³ and comply with mechanical benchmarks (modulus of rupture: 10-12 MPa) [46]. Multilayer boards combining agro-waste with Amazonian fibers further enhance durability [47]. Bio-plastics from sunflower stalks or marine residues, treated with agents like G-3216, offer biodegradability and competitive mechanical properties (67.5kPa elasticity) [48]. These innovations highlight agro-waste’s role in creating eco-friendly, cost-effective alternatives to conventional materials, fostering sustainability across the construction lifecycle.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds significant potential in enhancing the development and application of agro-waste materials in sustainable construction [49]. Through advanced data analysis and predictive modeling, AI can assist researchers in identifying the most effective combinations of agro-waste materials and processing techniques [50]. Machine learning models are particularly useful for forecasting how these materials will perform under varying environmental and structural conditions, reducing the reliance on time-consuming physical experiments [51]. AI can also simulate insulation efficiency, structural integrity, and thermal behavior, enabling more efficient design and testing of agro-wastebased construction components [52]. These intelligent tools support innovation by allowing quicker and more accurate material development, paving the way for more resilient, cost-effective and eco-friendly building solutions.

AI also plays a vital role in evaluating the environmental and economic aspects of agro-waste use. Enhanced life cycle assessments (LCA) powered by AI can process large datasets to determine the environmental impact [53], energy consumption, and long-term sustainability of agro-waste materials from production to disposal [54]. In addition, AI-driven analytics can interpret market trends and consumer preferences to identify opportunities for introducing these materials into mainstream construction [55]. Supply chain optimization, guided by AI algorithms, can further streamline the sourcing, processing, and delivery of agro-waste products, making them more scalable and commercially viable [56]. By embedding AI across research, development and implementation stages, stakeholders can effectively address performance challenges, minimize environmental risks [57] and promote wider adoption of agro-waste in the building industry.

The use of agro-waste in construction materials offers numerous environmental, economic, and structural benefits [58]. In Pakistan, where agriculture generates a large volume of organic waste annually, incorporating this waste into building materials helps address major disposal challenges and reduces pollution caused by open burning or landfilling [59]. Environmentally, it supports the conservation of non-renewable resources by partially replacing conventional raw materials like cement and sand, thus lowering energy consumption and carbon emissions [60]. Structurally, agro-waste such as rice husk ash, sugarcane bagasse ash, and natural fibers has been successfully used to produce lightweight, thermally efficient bricks and concrete that meet standard strength requirements [61]. These materials not only enhance energy efficiency and indoor comfort but also reduce overall construction costs, making them a sustainable alternative for modern building practices [62].

Despite these advantages, the use of agro-waste in construction also presents several limitations. Many agro-wastebased materials, while lightweight and eco-friendly, may lack the structural strength required for load-bearing applications, limiting their use to non-structural elements [63]. Additionally, the integration of such materials often demands specialized processing techniques such as chemical treatment, heat application, or binding with synthetic agents to improve durability and compatibility [64], which can increase production costs and energy use. The absence of standardized mixing ratios and guidelines also creates inconsistency in material performance, requiring time-consuming trial and error [65]. Moreover, skilled labor is often necessary for proper implementation and conventional construction methods still dominate due to their simplicity and reliability [66]. These challenges must be addressed before agro-waste materials can be widely adopted in the mainstream construction industry.

Agro-waste materials present valuable opportunities for advancing sustainable construction, but further research is necessary to fully unlock their benefits and overcome current limitations [67]. Future efforts should prioritize improving processing methods to enhance compatibility, durability and mechanical strength when incorporated into construction materials [68]. There is also a need to develop environmentally friendly chemical treatments aimed at reducing fungal emissions [69]. An important area for exploration is minimizing the flammability of agro-waste-based insulation products, which remains relatively under-researched. Researchers should investigate innovative applications, such as combining different agro-waste materials or arranging them in varied orientations to improve performance [70]. These strategies could result in significant advancements in insulation capabilities and overall material behavior [71]. Addressing these gaps will not only enhance the functionality of agro-waste composites but also expand their applicability across diverse construction scenarios.

To better understand and address the barriers hindering practical use of agro-waste in construction, collaboration with experts through interviews and industry consultations is essential [72]. Survey-based studies can help identify key indicators for market introduction and consumer acceptance of biomass-based materials [73]. Further investigation is needed into the thermal properties and long-term durability of these materials under various environmental conditions [74]. In particular, more work should be done to explore their thermodynamic behavior and how it impacts energy efficiency in buildings [75]. Combining different biowaste types may yield improved outcomes and should be a focus of experimental research. Life cycle assessments are also critical to determine the full environmental footprint from sourcing to end-of-life disposal [76]. Additionally, analyzing the economic viability and scalability of these materials will help pave the way for their inclusion in mainstream construction practices [77]. A multidisciplinary approach will be essential in turning potential into practical, market-ready solutions.

The integration of agro-waste materials into construction practices has emerged as a promising approach to address both environmental concerns and resource efficiency. With the increasing demand for sustainable alternatives to conventional materials like cement and steel, agro-waste offers a renewable and largely underutilized resource. Materials such as rice husks, coconut shells and sugarcane bagasse have demonstrated potential in enhancing thermal insulation, reducing building weight and lowering overall construction costs. Experimental results have also confirmed that agro-waste-based products can meet the strength and durability standards required for various non-structural and even some structural applications. However, challenges remain in terms of ensuring material consistency, optimizing treatment methods, and addressing issues such as flammability and biological degradation. The lack of standardized procedures and long-term performance data can limit their widespread acceptance in the construction market. Nonetheless, the advantages ranging from reducing carbon emissions to promoting circular economies highlight the importance of further research and development in this area. Stakeholder collaboration and government support can play a pivotal role in overcoming these hurdles and scaling the application of agro-waste materials in mainstream construction.

In summary, agro-waste has significant potential to revolutionize the construction industry by providing sustainable, cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional materials. Its use can substantially reduce the environmental footprint of buildings while addressing issues related to waste disposal and resource scarcity. Although current challenges such as processing complexities, lack of industry-wide standards, and performance variability hinder broader adoption, these can be mitigated through focused research and technological innovation. The development of efficient treatment techniques, life cycle assessments and market readiness evaluations will be crucial to validate the practical viability of agro-waste materials. Moreover, interdisciplinary collaboration between scientists, engineers, and policymakers is essential to promote innovation and encourage the transition to greener construction practices. With continuous advancement and investment, agro-waste materials can become a mainstream component of sustainable construction, supporting global goals for environmental protection, economic efficiency, and social wellbeing.

The author declares no competing interests related to this study.

The author expresses sincere gratitude to the Capital University of Science & Technology (CUST), Islamabad, Pakistan, for providing the necessary resources and support for this research. Special appreciation is extended to mentors and colleagues for their valuable guidance and insightful discussions that contributed to the development of this work.

1. Bhoj S, Manoj A, Bhaskar S (2023) Usage potential and benefits of processed coconut shells in concrete as coarse aggregates. Mater Today Proc.
2. Sagar TS, Paluri Y, Krishna YM, Ravi B, Ravi Y (2023) Utilization of fly ash and coconut shell as sustainable alternatives in M30 grade concrete: A feasibility study. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 1280: 012020.
3. Odeyemi SO, Durosinlorun AO, Wilson UN (2023) Determination of physical and mechanical properties of fibre reinforced coconut shell concrete. Civ Eng Infrastruct J 57(2): 423-430.
4. De Avila LA, Noldin JA, Mariot CH, Massoni PF, Fipke MV, et al. (2021) Status of weedy rice (Oryza spp.) infestation and management practices in southern Brazil. Weed Sci 69(5): 536–546.
5. Siddika A, Al Mamun MA, Alyousef R, Mohammadhosseini H (2021) State-of-the-art-review on rice husk ash: A supplementary cementitious material in concrete. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 33(5): 294-307.
6. Rithuparna R, Jittin V, Bahurudeen A (2021) Influence of different processing methods on the recycling potential of agro-waste ashes for sustainable cement production: A review. J Clean Prod 316: 128242.
7. Silva LA, Dos Santos IFS, De Oliveira Machado G, Tiago Filho GL, Barros RM (2021) Rice husk energy production in Brazil: An economic and energy extensive analysis. J Clean Prod 290: 125188.
8. Mboya HA, King’ondu CK, Njau KN, Mrema AL (2017) Measurement of pozzolanic activity index of scoria, pumice and rice husk ash as potential supplementary cementitious materials for Portland cement. Adv Civ Eng 2017: 6952645.
9. Hadipramana J, Samad AAA, Ahmad Mujahid AZ, Mohamad N, Riza FV (2014) Contribution of RHA granules as filler to improve the impact resistance of foamed concrete. Key Eng Mater 594: 93-97.
10. Makul N, Sua-iam G (2016) Characteristics and utilization of sugarcane filter cake waste in the production of lightweight foamed concrete. J Clean Prod 126: 118-133.
11. Jayanthi V, Avudaiappan S, Amran M, Arunachalam KP, Qader DN, et al. (2022) Innovative use of micronized biomass silica-GGBS as agro-industrial by-products for the production of a sustainable high-strength geopolymer concrete. Case Stud Constr Mater 18: e01782.
12. Alyami M, Hakeem IY, Amin M, Zeyad AM, Tayeh BA, et al. (2023) Effect of agricultural olive, rice husk and sugarcane leaf waste ashes on sustainable ultra-high-performance concrete. J Build Eng 72: 106689.
13. Noaman AT, Abed MS, Al-Gebory L, Al-Zubaidi AB, Al-Tabbakh AA (2023) Production of Agro-waste cement Composites: Influence of nutshells on mechanical and hardened properties. Constr Build Mater 394: 132137.
14. Baran Y, Gökçe HS, Durmaz M (2020) Physical and mechanical properties of cement containing regional hazelnut shell ash wastes. J Clean Prod 259: 120965.
15. European Committee for Standardisation. EN 197-1 (2011) Cement—Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. European Committee for Standardisation, London, UK.
16. Jannat N, Al-Mufti RL, Hussien A, Abdullah B, Cotgrave A (2021) Utilisation of nut shell wastes in brick, mortar and concrete: A review. Constr Build Mater 293: 123546.
17. Maraveas C (2020) Production of sustainable construction materials using agro-wastes. Materials 13(2): 262.
18. Son S, Park K, Fitriani H, Kim S (2021) Embodied CO₂ reduction effects of composite precast concrete frame for heavily loaded long-span logistics buildings. Sustainability 13(3): 1060.
19. Chen L, Chen Z, Xie Z, Wei L, Hua J, et al. (2023) Recent developments on natural fiber concrete: A review of properties, sustainability, applications, barriers and opportunities. Dev Built Environ 16: 100255.
20. Kc S, Gautam D (2021) Progress in sustainable structural engineering: A review. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6(2): 68.
21. Liu T, Chen L, Yang M, Sandanayake M, Miao P, et al. (2022) Sustainability considerations of green buildings: A detailed overview on current advancements and future considerations. Sustainability 14(21): 14393.
22. Osman AI, Chen L, Yang M, Msigwa G, Farghali M, et al. (2023) Cost, environmental impact and resilience of renewable energy under a changing climate: A review. Environ Chem Lett 21(2): 741-764.
23. Ricciardi P, Belloni E, Merli F, Buratti C (2021) Sustainable panels made with industrial and agricultural waste: thermal and environmental critical analysis of the experimental results. Appl Sci 11(2): 494.
24. Aneke FI, Shabangu C (2021) Green-efficient masonry bricks produced from scrap plastic waste and foundry sand. Case Stud Constr Mater 14: e00515.
25. Chen L, Huang L, Hua J, Chen Z, Wei L, et al. (2023) Green construction for low-carbon cities: A review. Environ Chem Lett 21(3): 1627-1657.
26. Zamora-Castro SA, Salgado-Estrada R, Sandoval-Herazo LC, Melendez-Armenta RA, Manzano-Huerta E, et al. (2021) Sustainable development of concrete through aggregates and innovative materials: A review. Appl Sci 11(2): 629.
27. Chen L, Chen Z, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Osman AI, et al. (2023) Artificial intelligence-based solutions for climate change: A review. Environ Chem Lett 21(5): 2525-2557.
28. Chen L, Msigwa G, Yang M, Osman AI, Fawzy S, et al. (2022) Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: A review. Environ Chem Lett 20(4): 2277-2310.
29. Farghali M, Osman AI, Mohamed IMA, Chen Z, Chen L, et al. (2023) Strategies to save energy in the context of the energy crisis: a review. Environ Chem Lett 21(4): 2003–2039.
30. Yang M, Chen L, Wang J, Msigwa G, Osman AI, et al. (2023) Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues. Environ Chem Lett 21(1): 55-80.
31. Kolak MN, Oltulu M (2023) Investigation of mechanical and thermal properties of new type bio-composites containing camelina. Constr Build Mater 362: 129779.
32. Hamada HM, Thomas BS, Yahaya FM, Muthusamy K, Yang J, et al. (2021) Sustainable use of palm oil fuel ash as a supplementary cementitious material: A comprehensive review. J Build Eng 40: 102286.
33. Yang M, Chen L, Msigwa G, Tang KHD, Yap PS, et al. (2022) Implications of COVID-19 on global environmental pollution and carbon emissions with strategies for sustainability in the COVID-19 era. Sci Total Environ 809: 151657.
34. Tahmasebinia F, Ma Y, Joshua K, Sepasgozar SM, Yu Y, et al. (2021) Sustainable architecture creating arches using a bamboo grid shell structure: Numerical analysis and design. Sustainability 13(5): 2598.
35. Li Z, Tian Q, Chen Y, Zhao B, Qiu F, et al. (2023) Superhydrophobic degradable cellulose-based film with radiation insulation performance for agricultural application. Cellulose 30: 5145-5156.
36. Mahieu A, Alix S, Leblanc N (2019) Properties of particleboards made of agricultural by-products with a classical binder or self-bound. Ind Crops Prod 130: 371-379.
37. Cetiner I, Shea AD (2018) Wood waste as an alternative thermal insulation for buildings. Energy Build 168: 374-384.
38. Pavelek M, Adamová T (2019) Bio-waste thermal insulation panel for sustainable building construction in steady and unsteady-state conditions. Materials 12(12): 2004.
39. Zhang X, Lian Z, Wu Y (2017) Human physiological responses to wooden indoor environment. Physiol Behav 174: 27-34.
40. Guna V, Ilangovan M, Rather MH, Giridharan BV, Prajwal B, et al. (2019) Groundnut shell/rice husk agro-waste reinforced polypropylene hybrid biocomposites. J Build Eng 27: 100991.
41. Wi K, Lee H, Lim S, Song H, Hussin M, et al. (2018) Use of an agricultural by-product, nano sized palm oil fuel ash as a supplementary cementitious material. Constr Build Mater 183: 139-149.
42. Chabriac P, Gourdon E, Gle P, Fabbri A, Lenormand H, et al. (2016) Agricultural by-products for building insulation: Acoustical characterization and modeling to predict micro-structural parameters. Constr Build Mater 112: 158-167.
43. Shafigh P, Mahmud H, Jumaat M, Zargar M (2014) Agricultural wastes as aggregate in concrete mixtures-A review. Constr Build Mater 53: 110-117.
44. Obi F, Ugwuishiwu B, Nwakaire J (2016) Agricultural waste concept, generation, utilization and management. Niger J Technol 35(4).
45. Madrid M, Orbe A, Rojí E, Cuadrado J (2017) The effects of by-products incorporated in low-strength concrete for concrete masonry units. Constr Build Mater 153: 117-128.
46. Figaredo A, Dhanya M (2018) Development of sustainable brick materials incorporating Agro-wastes: An overview. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 5: 721-726.
47. Sathiparan N, De Zoysa H (2018) The effects of using agricultural waste as partial substitute for sand in cement blocks. J Build Eng 19: 216-227.
48. Ashour T, Korjenic A, Korjenic S, Wu W (2015) Thermal conductivity of unfired earth bricks reinforced by agricultural wastes with cement and gypsum. Energy Build 104: 139-146.
49. Chaussinand A, Scartezzini J, Nik V (2015) Straw bale: A waste from agriculture, a new construction material for sustainable buildings. Energy Procedia 78: 297-302.
50. Rahman M, Muntohar A, Pakrashi V, Nagaratnam B, Sujan D, et al. (2014) Self-compacting concrete from uncontrolled burning of rice husk and blended fine aggregate. Mater Des 55: 410-415.
51. Rahman M, Leblouba M, Pakrashi V (2014) Improvement of engineering properties of peat with palm oil clinker. Pertanika J Sci Technol 22: 627-636.
52. Rahman M, Boon A, Muntohar A, Hashem TM, Pakrashi V, et al. (2014) Performance of masonry blocks incorporating palm oil fuel ash. J Clean Prod 78: 195-201.
53. Modani P, Vyawahare M (2013) Utilization of bagasse ash as a partial replacement of fine aggregate in concrete. Procedia Eng 51: 25-29.
54. Rao M, Prabath N (2015) Green concrete using Agro industrial waste (sugarcane bagasse ASH). Int J Soft Comput Eng 5(1): 86-92.
55. Rodier L, Villar CE, Ballesteros J, Junior H (2019) Potential use of sugarcane bagasse and bamboo leaf ashes for elaboration of green cementitious materials. J Clean Prod 231: 54-63.
56. Akram T, Memon S, Obaid H (2009) Production of low-cost self-compacting concrete using bagasse ash. Constr Build Mater 23(2): 703-712.
57. Kimeng H, Ekundayo O, Sani M, Frederick K (2015) Feasibility study of the use of groundnut shells as fine aggregates in light weight concrete construction. Int J Adv Res Eng 1(1): 13.
58. Sada B, Amartey Y, Bako S (2013) An investigation into the use of groundnut as fine aggregate replacement. Niger J Technol 32: 54-60.
59. Liu L, Li H, Lazzaretto A, Manente G, Tong G, et al. (2017) The development history and prospects of biomass-based insulation materials for buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 69: 912-932.
60. Benfratello S, Capitano C, Peri G, Rizzo G, Scaccianoce G, et al. (2013) Thermal and structural properties of a hemp–lime biocomposite. Constr Build Mater 48: 745-754.
61. Elfordy S, Lucas F, Tancret F, Scudeller Y, Goudet L (2008) Mechanical and thermal properties of lime and hemp concrete (“hempcrete”) manufactured by a projection process. Constr Build Mater 22(10): 2116-2123.
62. Rojas C, Cea M, Iriarte A, Valdés G, Navia R, et al. (2019) Thermal insulation materials based on agricultural residual wheat straw and corn husk biomass, for application in sustainable buildings. Sustain Mater Technol 20: e00102.
63. Gaitonde V, Karnik S, Davim J (2015) Multiple performance optimization in drilling using Taguchi method with utility and modified utility concepts. Mater Form Mach 99-115.
64. Belayachi N, Hoxha D, Ismail B (2017) Impact of fiber treatment on the fire reaction and thermal degradation of building insulation straw composite. Energy Procedia 139: 544-549.
65. Wang J, Zuo Y, Xiao J, Li P, Wu Y (2019) Construction of compatible interface of straw/magnesia lightweight materials by alkali treatment. Constr Build Mater 228: 116712.
66. Bakatovich A, Gaspar F (2019) Composite material for thermal insulation based on moss raw material. Constr Build Mater 228: 116699.
67. Sair S, Mandili B, Taqi M, El Bouari A (2019) Development of a new eco-friendly composite material based on gypsum reinforced with a mixture of cork fibre and cardboard waste for building thermal insulation. Compos Commun 16: 20-24.
68. Wang Y, Wu K, Xiao M, Riffat S, Su Y, et al. (2018) Thermal conductivity, structure and mechanical properties of konjac glucomannan/starch-based aerogel strengthened by wheat straw. Carbohydr Polym 197: 284-291.
69. Abu-Jdayil B, Mourad AH, Hittini W, Hassan M, Hameedi S (2019) Traditional, state-of-the-art and renewable thermal building insulation materials: An overview. Constr Build Mater 214: 709-735.
70. Chen ZY (2020) Research on modern architectural engineering and green building materials. Green Build Mater 8(6): 42-45.
71. Colangelo F, Farina I, Travaglioni M, Salzano C, Cioffi R, et al. (2021) Innovative materials in Italy for eco-friendly and sustainable buildings. Materials 14(8): 2048.
72. Darko A, Chan AP, Huo X, Owusu-Manu DG (2019) A scientometric analysis and visualization of global green building research. Build Environ 149: 501-511.
73. De Luca P, Carbone I, Nagy JB (2017) Green building materials: A review of state of the art studies of innovative materials. J Green Build 12(4): 141-161.
74. Debrah C, Owusu-Manu DG, Kissi E, Oduro-Ofori E, Edwards DJ (2022) Barriers to green cities development in developing countries: evidence from Ghana. Smart Sustain Built Environ 11(3): 438-453.
75. Dong T, Yin S, Zhang N (2023) The interaction mechanism and dynamic evolution of digital green innovation in the integrated green building supply chain. Systems 11(3): 122.
76. Dong T, Yin S, Zhang N (2023) New energy-driven construction industry: digital green innovation investment project selection of photovoltaic building materials enterprises using an integrated fuzzy decision approach. Systems 11(1): 11.
77. Feng Q, Chen H, Shi X, Wei J (2020) Stakeholder games in the evolution and development of green buildings in China: government-led perspective. J Clean Prod 275: 122895.