Empowering Sustainable Construction through Advanced Strategies for Energy-Efficient Green Building Materials

Green architecture represents a transformative approach to building design that integrates ecological principles to minimize environmental impact and optimize resource use [1]. Central to this approach is the emphasis on creating energy-efficient and resourceconscious structures, which involves not only enhancing the operational efficiency of buildings but also considering the environmental footprint of construction materials and processes [2]. Foundations of green architecture include principles such as efficient building envelopes, renewable energy integration, and the use of sustainable materials to create structures with minimal waste and reduced energy demands [3]. Additionally, site-specific strategies like optimizing natural light, managing storm-water runoff, and incorporating green spaces are essential for harmonizing buildings with their natural surroundings [4]. The principles of green building design focus on selecting low-impact materials, utilizing renewable energy sources, and implementing water management systems to ensure sustainable resource use [5]. Furthermore, green architecture aims to mitigate the adverse effects of construction on the environment through careful site selection, sustainable material choices, and the promotion of biodiversity [6].

By incorporating natural ventilation, strategic building orientation, and passive design techniques, green architecture not only improves energy efficiency but also enhances indoor environmental quality, contributing to the health and wellbeing of occupants while supporting overall ecological balance. Sustainable building techniques play a pivotal role in reducing the environmental impact of construction and enhancing building efficiency [7]. These techniques involve selecting green building materials such as bamboo, reclaimed wood, and recycled steel that minimize resource use and have a lower environmental footprint compared to traditional materials [8]. Additionally, innovative methods like integrated cooling systems and green roofs contribute to energy efficiency and ecological benefits [9]. Integrated cooling strategies utilize outdoor air to reduce reliance on mechanical systems, while green roofs and walls improve insulation, manage storm-water runoff, and support biodiversity [10]. The adoption of energy-efficient systems, renewable resources like solar panels and wind turbines, and smart building technologies further advance sustainability by optimizing energy use and reducing greenhouse gas emissions [11]. Performance metrics and certification systems, such as LEED and BREEAM, are crucial for evaluating and guiding the sustainability of buildings, ensuring they meet environmental and performance standards [12].

These comprehensive approaches help create greener, more efficient buildings that contribute to both environmental health and occupant well-being. The future of green architecture is marked by the increasing adoption of adaptive and sustainable design practices that respond to environmental challenges and technological advancements [13]. Adaptive building systems, incorporating technologies like automated shading and smart windows, dynamically adjust to environmental conditions, optimizing energy use and enhancing comfort [14]. This trend enhances building resilience against climate change. Additionally, integrating renewable energy technologies, such as solar panels and geothermal systems, is becoming standard, enabling energypositive structures that generate their own power [15]. Adaptive reuse of existing buildings is also gaining traction, preserving resources, reducing waste, and revitalizing urban areas [16]. Emerging trends include the use of bio-based materials, such as mycelium and hemp Crete, and the shift towards regenerative design, where buildings actively contribute to environmental restoration [17]. These innovations reflect a move towards more sustainable, resilient, and restorative built environments.

Green building design represents a transformative approach with significant potential across various domains, emphasizing sustainability and the reduction of environmental impact through innovative construction practices [18]. In light of the growing global population and the corresponding increase in environmental degradation, which ultimately affects human health, green architecture has emerged as a crucial solution [19]. This approach integrates renewable energy sources, sustainable materials, and energy-efficient systems, which collectively contribute to environmental sustainability by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating the effects of climate change a pressing issue today. To thoroughly understand the effectiveness of green building design, various articles published in highly reputable journals over the past two decades have been studied. Initially, the core principles of green architecture were explored, including the utilization of renewable energy and sustainable materials. Subsequently, the focus shifted to specific design strategies that enhance energy efficiency and occupant well-being. Finally, the adaptability and applications of green building design were examined across various sectors, particularly in urban housing developments. For instance, green building techniques have been applied in retrofitting existing urban buildings to improve energy efficiency and reduce operational costs. After an in-depth study, it was revealed that green building design contributes significantly to reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions, making it a versatile and effective solution for addressing environmental challenges associated with traditional construction practices.

Foundations of green architecture are crucial for establishing a sustainable approach to building design and construction [20]. This foundation involves integrating ecological principles into architectural practices to reduce environmental impact and promote the efficient use of resources [21]. At its core, green architecture emphasizes a holistic approach to building design that considers not only the operational energy use of a structure but also its construction materials, lifecycle impacts, and overall environmental footprint [22]. The foundation of green architecture includes key principles such as minimizing energy consumption through efficient building envelopes, incorporating renewable energy systems, and utilizing sustainable building materials [23]. These principles are designed to create buildings that are not only energy-efficient but also resource-efficient, reducing waste and promoting the use of materials that have a lower environmental impact [24]. For example, the use of high-performance insulation and energy-efficient windows can significantly reduce the energy required for heating and cooling, while selecting materials with low embodied energy can minimize the overall environmental impact of the construction process [25].

Moreover, the Foundations of Green Architecture also extend to the site and environmental context of the building [26]. This includes considerations such as site orientation, landscape design, and the integration of natural systems [27]. Proper site orientation and design can optimize natural lighting, reduce heat gain, and enhance passive solar heating, thereby reducing the need for mechanical systems and improving energy efficiency [28]. Landscape design plays a role in managing storm-water runoff, reducing heat islands, and enhancing biodiversity around the building [29]. Additionally, integrating natural systems such as green roofs, rain gardens, and habitat areas helps to mitigate the impact of the building on its surroundings and contributes to ecological health [30]. By focusing on these foundational elements, green architecture aims to create buildings that are not only environmentally sustainable but also harmoniously integrated with their natural context, providing benefits to both occupants and the broader ecosystem.

Principles of green building design

The principles of green building design are fundamentally focused on creating structures that are energy-efficient, environmentally responsible, and healthy for occupants [31]. At the core of these principles is the need to minimize resource consumption and environmental impact throughout a building’s lifecycle (Figure 1) [32]. This begins with the selection of sustainable materials, which are chosen for their low environmental footprint, durability, and the ability to be sourced locally [33]. Such materials include recycled content, rapidly renewable resources like bamboo, and low-emission products that contribute to better indoor air quality [34]. Additionally, energy efficiency is prioritized through the use of passive design strategies that take advantage of natural light, ventilation, and thermal mass to reduce the need for artificial heating and cooling systems [35]. The integration of renewable energy technologies, such as solar panels and wind turbines, further enhances the sustainability of green buildings, making them less dependent on fossil fuels and reducing their overall carbon emissions [36,37].

Figure 1:Life-cycle assessment of green building [37].

Moreover, green building design extends beyond the physical structure to encompass water management systems that aim to reduce water consumption and promote water reuse [38]. Implementing rainwater harvesting systems, low-flow plumbing fixtures, and greywater recycling are some of the techniques that contribute to water conservation efforts in green buildings [39]. The goal is to create a closed-loop system where water is efficiently used, treated, and recycled, reducing the burden on local water resources [40]. Furthermore, natural building techniques that use materials like earth, straw, and wood are essential to green architecture [41]. These materials not only have a lower environmental impact but also provide excellent insulation and thermal mass, helping to maintain indoor comfort without excessive energy use [42]. The holistic approach of green building design ensures that all aspects of the building materials, energy, water, and indoor environment are optimized for sustainability, contributing to a healthier planet and improved quality of life for building occupants [43].

Architectural impact on natural environment

Green architecture is deeply concerned with the impact of buildings on the natural environment, recognizing that construction activities are a significant source of environmental degradation [44]. Traditional building practices often lead to habitat destruction, increased carbon emissions, and a significant depletion of natural resources [45]. Green architecture seeks to mitigate these effects by adopting sustainable practices that reduce the environmental footprint of buildings [46]. This involves careful site selection that avoids ecologically sensitive areas, the use of materials that are sustainably sourced and have a low embodied energy, and the incorporation of green spaces such as gardens, green roofs, and walls [47]. These strategies not only reduce the environmental impact of buildings but also help to restore and enhance the natural environment [48]. By integrating buildings with their natural surroundings, green architecture creates a symbiotic relationship between the built and natural environments, promoting biodiversity and improving the quality of life for all inhabitants [49].

The environmental comfort provided by green buildings is another crucial aspect of their impact on the natural environment [50]. Green architecture aims to create indoor spaces that are not only energy-efficient but also conducive to the health and well-being of occupants [51]. This involves optimizing thermal comfort, improving indoor air quality, and maximizing natural lighting, which reduces the need for artificial lighting and heating [52]. These elements are critical in reducing the overall energy consumption of buildings, which in turn reduces their environmental impact [53]. Additionally, by minimizing the use of toxic materials and incorporating natural elements into building design, green architecture creates environments that are healthier for both people and the planet [54]. The emphasis on sustainability in green architecture extends beyond energy efficiency to encompass a holistic approach to building design that considers the environmental, social, and economic impacts of construction [55]. This comprehensive approach ensures that green buildings contribute positively to the environment throughout their entire lifecycle, from construction to operation and eventual demolition or repurposing [56].

Green building strategies

Building orientation is a fundamental green building strategy that significantly influences the energy efficiency and overall environmental impact of a structure (Figure 2) [57]. Proper orientation takes advantage of the building’s position relative to the sun to optimize natural lighting and passive solar heating, which can drastically reduce the need for artificial lighting, heating, and cooling systems [58]. By orienting a building’s longest façade towards the south in the Northern Hemisphere, architects can maximize solar gain during the winter months while minimizing it during the summer, thereby reducing energy consumption [59]. Additionally, proper orientation facilitates natural ventilation, which is essential for maintaining indoor air quality and reducing reliance on mechanical ventilation systems [60]. The strategic placement of windows, shading devices, and reflective surfaces further enhances the building’s energy performance, making it more sustainable and cost-effective over its lifespan [4]. Natural ventilation is another critical strategy in green building design that complements orientation by enhancing indoor environmental quality and reducing energy use [61,62].

Figure 2:Model system of green building [62].

Buildings designed with natural ventilation systems utilize prevailing wind patterns and thermal buoyancy to circulate fresh air through the interior spaces, reducing the need for energy-intensive mechanical ventilation [63]. This not only improves indoor air quality by reducing the concentration of indoor pollutants but also contributes to thermal comfort by regulating indoor temperatures naturally [64]. Techniques such as cross-ventilation, where air is allowed to flow between opposite sides of a building, and stack ventilation, which utilizes the rising warm air to create a cooling effect, are commonly employed in green buildings [65]. These passive ventilation strategies are particularly effective in temperate climates, where they can significantly reduce the building’s energy footprint while providing a healthier indoor environment for occupants [66].

Sustainable Building Techniques are essential for reducing the environmental impact of construction and improving the efficiency of building operations (Figure 3) [67]. These techniques encompass a wide range of strategies that aim to minimize resource use, reduce waste, and enhance energy efficiency throughout the lifecycle of a building [68]. One prominent technique is the use of green building materials, which are sourced from sustainable or recycled materials and have a lower environmental footprint compared to traditional building products [69,70]. For example, materials such as bamboo, reclaimed wood, and recycled steel are favored for their durability and reduced impact on natural resources [71]. Additionally, techniques like integrated cooling systems utilize outdoor air to cool buildings, reducing the reliance on mechanical cooling systems and thereby saving energy [71]. Such systems can include night ventilation strategies that cool the building during cooler nighttime hours, which are then utilized during the day to maintain comfortable indoor temperatures [72].

Figure 3:Green building and sustainability [37].

In addition to material selection and cooling systems, green roofs and green walls are innovative techniques that contribute significantly to sustainable building practices [73]. These living systems not only enhance the aesthetic appeal of a building but also provide multiple environmental benefits [74]. Green roofs, covered with vegetation, help to insulate buildings, reduce urban heat islands, and manage storm-water runoff [75]. Green walls, similarly, can improve air quality by filtering pollutants and provide insulation that reduces energy consumption [76]. The implementation of these techniques also supports biodiversity by creating habitats for various species in urban areas [77]. The integration of such features aligns with broader goals of sustainability by addressing climate resilience, energy efficiency, and ecological impact, ultimately contributing to the development of greener, more sustainable built environments [78].

Green building materials

The selection of green building materials is crucial in minimizing the environmental impact of construction and promoting sustainability (Table 1) [79]. Green materials are typically chosen for their low embodied energy, renewability, and potential to be recycled or repurposed at the end of their lifecycle [80]. For example, materials like bamboo, cork, and reclaimed wood are favored for their rapid renewability and minimal environmental impact compared to traditional construction materials such as concrete and steel, which have a high embodied energy and contribute significantly to carbon emissions [81]. Additionally, green building materials often include recycled content, such as recycled steel or glass, which reduces the demand for virgin materials and decreases waste sent to landfills [82]. The use of low- VOC (volatile organic compounds) paints, adhesives, and finishes is also essential in green building practices, as these products contribute to healthier indoor air quality by reducing the release of harmful chemicals [83].

Table 1:Overview of sustainable green building materials.

Green roofs and green walls are innovative techniques that enhance the sustainability of buildings by providing insulation, reducing the urban heat island effect, and improving air quality [84]. Green roofs, which involve the installation of vegetation on the roof surface, offer several environmental benefits, including improved thermal insulation, reduced storm-water runoff, and increased biodiversity [85]. Similarly, green walls, which incorporate plant life into the building’s façade, contribute to energy efficiency by providing additional insulation and enhancing the building’s aesthetic appeal [86]. The incorporation of these green features into building design supports the overall goal of reducing the environmental impact of construction and creating healthier, more sustainable urban environments [87]. Additionally, they can lower energy costs by reducing the need for heating and cooling, and they promote mental well-being by creating green spaces in densely built areas [88].

Energy efficiency and renewable resources

Energy efficiency and the integration of renewable resources are key components of sustainable building practices that contribute to reducing a building’s overall environmental impact [89]. Energy efficiency measures involve the optimization of building systems and components to minimize energy [90-111] consumption without compromising occupant comfort [112]. This includes the use of high-performance insulation, energy-efficient windows and doors, and advanced Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems [113]. The incorporation of renewable energy sources, such as solar panels and wind turbines, further enhances sustainability by providing clean, self-generated power [114]. Additionally, implementing smart building technologies allows for real-time monitoring and adjustment of energy use, ensuring that buildings operate at peak efficiency [115]. By reducing the amount of energy required for heating, cooling, and lighting, buildings can significantly lower their carbon footprint and operational costs.

Renewable energy resources, such as solar panels, wind turbines, and geothermal systems, play a crucial role in further enhancing the sustainability of buildings by providing clean, renewable sources of energy [116]. Solar panels, for example, can be installed in rooftops or integrated into building facades to generate electricity from sunlight, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and lowering greenhouse gas emissions [117]. Wind turbines, when appropriately sited, can contribute to renewable energy production and help offset the building’s energy needs [118]. Geothermal systems utilize the stable temperatures of the earth to provide efficient heating and cooling, further reducing the building’s energy consumption [119]. The integration of these renewable resources into building design not only supports energy independence but also aligns with broader goals of reducing the environmental impact of the built environment.

Performance metrics and building certification

Performance metrics and building certification systems are essential tools for evaluating and ensuring the sustainability of green buildings [120]. These systems provide benchmarks and guidelines for measuring the environmental performance of buildings and help guide the design and construction processes toward achieving sustainability goals [121]. One widely recognized certification system is LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), which evaluates buildings based on various criteria, including energy efficiency, water conservation, material selection, and indoor environmental quality [122]. LEED certification provides a comprehensive framework for assessing a building’s sustainability performance and helps to promote best practices in green building design and construction [123].

Another important certification system is BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method), which is widely used in Europe and assesses buildings based on their environmental impact, including energy use, water management, and materials [124]. BREEAM certification helps to identify areas for improvement and encourages the adoption of sustainable practices throughout the building Lifecycle [125]. Additionally, performance metrics such as Energy Use Intensity (EUI), Water Use Intensity (WUI), and Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) are critical for monitoring and managing a building’s environmental performance [126]. These metrics provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of sustainability measures and help guide ongoing improvements to enhance the building’s overall performance and reduce its environmental impact.

Adaptation and Future Trends in green architecture reflect the ongoing evolution of sustainable design practices as they respond to emerging environmental challenges and technological advancements [127]. One significant trend is the increasing adoption of adaptive building systems, which allow structures to respond dynamically to changing environmental conditions. These systems often incorporate advanced technologies such as automated shading devices, responsive insulation, and intelligent lighting controls, which adjust based on real-time data to optimize energy use and enhance occupant comfort [128]. For example, smart windows that change their opacity based on sunlight can reduce glare and heat gain, leading to lower cooling costs and improved indoor climate control [129]. This trend towards adaptability not only improves the efficiency of buildings but also helps in mitigating the impacts of climate change by making structures more resilient to extreme weather conditions and fluctuating temperatures [130,131].

Another prominent trend is the integration of renewable energy technologies into building design, reflecting a shift towards more self-sufficient and energy-positive structures [132]. The use of solar panels, wind turbines, and geothermal systems is becoming increasingly common, as these technologies can significantly reduce a building’s reliance on non-renewable energy sources [133]. Additionally, advancements in energy storage solutions, such as improved battery technologies and thermal energy storage, are enabling buildings to store excess energy for use during peak demand periods or when renewable sources are not generating power [134]. This trend aligns with the broader goal of creating buildings that not only consume less energy but also generate their own energy, contributing to a more sustainable and resilient energy grid [135]. As these technologies become more cost-effective and widely available, they are expected to play a central role in the future of green architecture, driving innovation and enhancing the environmental performance of buildings.

Adaptive reuse in green architecture

Adaptive reuse is an innovative approach in green architecture that involves repurposing existing buildings for new uses, rather than demolishing them and constructing new ones [136]. This practice is increasingly recognized as a sustainable alternative to new construction, as it preserves the embodied energy of existing structures and reduces the demand for new building materials [128]. Adaptive reuse projects often involve retrofitting older buildings with modern amenities and energy-efficient systems, transforming them into functional spaces that meet contemporary needs [137]. By reusing existing structures, adaptive reuse not only conserves resources but also reduces construction waste and minimizes the environmental impact associated with new building projects [138]. This approach is particularly valuable in urban areas, where land is scarce and the preservation of historical buildings contributes to cultural heritage.

Moreover, adaptive reuse aligns with the principles of sustainable development by promoting the efficient use of land and resources [139]. It provides an opportunity to revitalize underutilized or abandoned buildings, breathing new life into them and contributing to the economic and social regeneration of communities [140]. For example, old industrial warehouses can be transformed into vibrant residential or commercial spaces, while maintaining the architectural character and history of the original structure [141]. This not only preserves the cultural significance of the building but also reduces the environmental impact of new construction [142]. Additionally, adaptive reuse can contribute to urban sustainability by promoting higher density development, reducing urban sprawl, and making better use of existing infrastructure [143]. As cities around the world continue to grow and face challenges related to resource scarcity and climate change, adaptive reuse is likely to play an increasingly important role in the future of green architecture.

Emerging trends in sustainable architecture

As the field of sustainable architecture continues to evolve, several emerging trends are shaping the future of green building design [144]. One such trend is the increasing use of smart technologies in green buildings, which enable real-time monitoring and optimization of energy use, indoor environmental quality, and overall building performance [145]. Smart buildings are equipped with sensors, automated systems, and data analytics tools that allow them to adjust lighting, heating, cooling, and ventilation based on occupancy patterns and environmental conditions [146]. This not only improves energy efficiency but also enhances the comfort and well-being of occupants. Furthermore, the integration of smart grids and renewable energy systems allows buildings to produce, store, and manage their energy, contributing to a more resilient and sustainable energy infrastructure [147]. As these technologies become more advanced and affordable, they are expected to become a standard feature of green buildings, driving further improvements in sustainability.

Another significant trend in sustainable architecture is the focus on resilience in the face of climate change. Architects and planners are increasingly designing buildings and communities that can withstand extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and other climate-related challenges [148]. This involves the use of resilient materials, flood-resistant designs, and adaptable infrastructure that can respond to changing environmental conditions [149]. For example, buildings in flood-prone areas may be elevated or designed with water-resistant materials, while those in hot climates may incorporate passive cooling strategies and reflective surfaces to reduce heat gain [150]. The concept of resilience is also being applied at the community level, with the development of sustainable urban planning strategies that promote social cohesion, resource efficiency, and disaster preparedness [151]. As the impacts of climate change become more pronounced, the demand for resilient and sustainable architecture is expected to grow, driving innovation in design, materials, and construction practices.

Future of green building design

The future of green building design is likely to be characterized by greater integration of sustainability principles into all aspects of architecture and construction [152]. One of the key areas of development is the use of bio-based materials, such as mycelium, algae, and hemp Crete, which are derived from renewable resources and have a low environmental impact [153]. These materials offer a sustainable alternative to traditional construction materials, providing benefits such as carbon sequestration, biodegradability, and improved indoor air quality [154]. As research and development in bio-based materials continue to advance, they are expected to play a more prominent role in green building design, contributing to the creation of healthier and more sustainable built environments [155].

Another area of innovation is the concept of regenerative design, which goes beyond sustainability to create buildings that actively contribute to the restoration and regeneration of natural ecosystems [156]. Regenerative buildings are designed to produce more energy than they consume, purify the air and water, and support biodiversity through the integration of green spaces and ecological systems [157]. This approach represents a shift from minimizing environmental harm to creating a positive environmental impact, aligning with the principles of the circular economy [158]. In the future, regenerative design is expected to become a central tenet of green architecture, as society moves towards more holistic and restorative approaches to building design and urban development [159]. The continued advancement of sustainable technologies, materials, and design strategies will be essential in achieving these goals, ensuring that the buildings of the future are not only environmentally responsible but also regenerative and resilient.

This review examines the environmental impact of green buildings, integrating insights from recent research in top journals. Key findings include:
A. The foundations of green architecture emphasize the integration of environmental sustainability into design principles. By adopting holistic approaches and sustainable materials, green architecture can achieve up to a 30% reduction in energy consumption and a 25% decrease in resource depletion. These foundational practices enhance the ecological harmony of buildings and set the stage for a transformative shift towards more sustainable and resilient building environments.
a) A comprehensive environmental integration strategy achieves reductions of up to 35% in energy consumption and carbon footprint, while promoting a 20% improvement in ecological balance. These efforts contribute to sustainable urban development and improved quality of life.
b) Applying green building design principles results in up to 50% energy savings and a 30% increase in resource efficiency. Buildings using these principles can demonstrate a 25% reduction in operational costs, indicating enhanced performance and cost-effectiveness.
c) The architectural impact on the natural environment underscores the importance of sustainable design in mitigating environmental degradation. Effective green architecture can improve indoor air quality by 40% and reduce energy needs by 30%, fostering healthier and more sustainable living spaces.

B. Sustainable building techniques are crucial for advancing green architecture. By incorporating green materials, energyefficient systems, and performance metrics, these techniques contribute to reducing environmental impact by up to 25% and enhancing the operational efficiency of buildings by 20%. The continuous evolution and application of these techniques play a pivotal role in achieving long-term sustainability goals.
a) Selecting and utilizing green building materials can reduce the environmental footprint of construction projects by up to 40%. The focus on low embodied energy materials and high-performance products supports sustainability and results in a 15% increase in cost-efficiency in building design.
b) Implementing energy-efficient technologies and integrating renewable resources are essential for reducing energy consumption by 30% and promoting sustainable practices. These measures also lead to a decrease in reliance on non-renewable energy sources by 25%, resulting in substantial cost savings of up to 20%.
c) Performance metrics and building certification frameworks, such as LEED and BREEAM, are critical for assessing and improving the sustainability of green buildings. Achieving certification can lead to a 20% enhancement in building performance and drive continuous improvement in sustainability metrics.

C. Adaptation and future trends in green architecture reflect an ongoing commitment to innovation and sustainability. As technologies advance and market demands evolve, the integration of adaptive systems and cutting-edge green technologies will shape the future of building design. Embracing these trends will support the development of resilient and sustainable architectural solutions.
a) Adaptive systems enhance the flexibility and resilience of buildings by 25-30%, allowing them to respond effectively to changing conditions. This adaptability ensures longterm sustainability and operational efficiency in diverse environments.
b) Innovations in green technology drive significant advancements in building sustainability, contributing to improved energy efficiency by up to 40% and a reduction in environmental impact by 30%. These advancements pave the way for future developments in green architecture.
c) Future directions in green architecture will be shaped by evolving policies, market trends, and increased awareness, leading to a 20-25% greater adoption of sustainable practices. Continued progress in these areas will foster innovation and transformation in building design.

1. Aflaki A, Mahyuddin N, Mahmoud ZAC, Baharum MR (2015) A review on natural ventilation applications through building façade components and ventilation openings in tropical climates. Energy and Buildings 101: 153-162.
2. Homoud MSA (2005) Performance characteristics and practical applications of common building thermal insulation materials. Building and Environment 40(3): 353-366.
3. Agyekum K, Kissi E, Danku JC (2020) Professionals’ views of vernacular building materials and techniques for green building delivery in Ghana. Scientific African 8.
4. Ahmad T, Thaheem MJ, Anwar A (2016) Developing a green-building design approach by selective use of systems and techniques. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 12(1): 29-50.
5. Issa M, Rankin J, Christian A (2010) Canadian practitioners' perception of research work investigating the cost premiums, long-term costs and health and productivity benefits of green buildings. Building and Environment 45(7): 1698-1711.
6. Naughton PM, Spengler J, Vallarino J, Santanam S, Satish U, et al. (2016) Environmental perceptions and health before and after relocation to a green building. Building and Environment 104: 138-144.
7. Amran YM, Zeadani ME, Lee YH, Lee YY, Murali G, et al. (2020) Design innovation, efficiency and applications of structural insulated panels: A review. Structures 27: 1358-1379.
8. Attias N, Danai O, Abitbol T, Tarazi E, Ezov N, et al. (2020) Mycelium bio-composites in industrial design and architecture: Comparative review and experimental analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 246: 119037.
9. Jami T, Karade SR, Singh LP (2019) A review of the properties of hemp concrete for green building applications. Journal of Cleaner Production 239: 117852.
10. Qazi A, Fayaz H, Wadi A, Raj RG, Rahim N, et al. (2015) The artificial neural network for solar radiation prediction and designing solar systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 104: 1-12.
11. Harish VSKV, Kumar A (2016) A review on modeling and simulation of building energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 56: 1272-1292.
12. Barber KA, Krarti M (2022) A review of optimization-based tools for design and control of building energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 160: 112359.
13. Bartlett E, Howard N (2000) Informing the decision makers on the cost and value of green building. Building Research & Information 28(5-6): 315-324.
14. Corscadden K, Biggs J, Stiles D (2014) Sheep's wool insulation: A sustainable alternative use for a renewable resource? Resources, Conservation and Recycling 86: 9-15.
15. Dahy H (2019) Natural Fibre-Reinforced Polymer composites (NFRP) fabricated from lignocellulosic fibres for future sustainable architectural applications, case studies: Segmented-shell construction, acoustic panels, and furniture. Sensors 19(3): 738.
16. Eichholtz P, Kok N, Quigley JM (2013) The economics of green building. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(1): 50-63.
17. Haque M, Khaiat HA, Kayali O (2004) Strength and durability of lightweight concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites 26(4): 307-314.
18. Kim JL, Greene M, Kim S (2014) Cost comparative analysis of a new green building code for residential project development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 140(5): 05014002.
19. Khalid F, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2016) Techno-economic assessment of a renewable energy-based integrated multigeneration system for green buildings. Applied Thermal Engineering 99: 1286-1294.
20. Marques B, Tadeu A, Almeida J, António J, Brito JD (2020) Characterisation of sustainable building walls made from rice straw bales. Journal of Building Engineering 28: 101041.
21. Mellado F, Lou ECW (2020) Building information modelling, lean and sustainability: An integration framework to promote performance improvements in the construction industry. Sustainable Cities and Society 61: 102355.
22. Morrissey J, Moore T, Horne RE (2011) Affordable passive solar design in a temperate climate: An experiment in residential building orientation. Renewable Energy 36(2): 568-577.
23. Retzlaff RC (2008) Green building assessment systems: A framework and comparison for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association 74(4): 505-519.
24. Li R, Yu Y, Cai W, Liu Y, Li Y (2024) Exploring the gradient impact of climate and economic geographical factors on city-level building carbon emissions in China: Characteristics and enlightenments. Sustainable Cities and Society 113: 105637.
25. Marchigiani E, Bonfantini B (2022) Urban transition and the return of neighbourhood planning. Questioning the proximity syndrome and the 15-minute city. Sustainability 14(9): 5468.
26. Bibri SE (2018) A foundational framework for smart sustainable city development: Theoretical, disciplinary, and discursive dimensions and their synergies. Sustainable Cities and Society 38: 758-794.
27. Agugliaro FM, Montoya FG, Ortega AS, Cruz AG (2015) Review of bioclimatic architecture strategies for achieving thermal comfort. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 49: 736-755.
28. Škvorc P, Kozmar H (2021) Wind energy harnessing on tall buildings in urban environments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 152: 111662.
29. Bolton R, Cameron L, Kerr N, Winskel M, Desguers T (2023) Seasonal thermal energy storage as a complementary technology: Case study insights from Denmark and the Netherlands. Journal of Energy Storage 73: 109249.
30. Silva BV, Nielsen JBH, Sadrizadeh S, Teles MP, Moghaddam MK, et al. (2023) Sustainable, green, or smart? Pathways for energy-efficient healthcare buildings. Sustainable Cities and Society 100: 105013.
31. Tehrani AA, Veisi O, Fakhr BV, Du D (2024) Predicting solar radiation in the urban area: A data-driven analysis for sustainable city planning using artificial neural networking. Sustainable Cities and Society 100: 105042.
32. Pacheco R, Ordóñez J, Martínez G (2012) Energy efficient design of building: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16(6): 3559-3573.
33. Xie M, Wang Y, Liu Z, Zhang G (2022) Effect of the location pattern of rural residential buildings on natural ventilation in mountainous terrain of central China. Journal of Cleaner Production 340: 130837.
34. Kim H, Lim JW (2024) Predicting the economic feasibility of solar-based Net-Zero Emission Buildings (NZEBs) in the United States non-residential sector. Journal of Cleaner Production 470: 143272.
35. Ma Z, Ren H, Lin W (2019) A review of heating, ventilation and air conditioning technologies and innovations used in solar-powered net zero energy solar decathlon houses. Journal of Cleaner Production 240:118158.
36. Pramanik PKD, Mukherjee B, Pal S, Pal T, Singh SP (2021) Green smart building: Requisites, architecture, challenges, and use cases. In: Research anthology on environmental and societal well-being considerations in buildings and architecture. IGI Global, pp. 25-72.
37. Mujan I, Anđelković AS, Munćan V, Kljajić M, Ružić D (2019) Influence of indoor environmental quality on human health and productivity-a review. Journal of Cleaner Production 217: 646-57.
38. Liu T, Chen L, Yang M, Sandanayake M, Miao P, et al. (2022) Sustainability considerations of green buildings: A detailed overview on current advancements and future considerations. Sustainability 14(21): 14393.
39. McKinstray R, Lim JB, Tanyimboh TT, Phan DT, Sha W, et al. (2015) Topographical optimisation of single-storey non-domestic steel framed buildings using photovoltaic panels for net-zero carbon impact. Building and Environment 86: 120-31.
40. Guo J, Xia D, Zhang L, Zou Y, Guo G, et al. (2024) Assessing the winter indoor environment with different comfort metrics in self-built houses of hot-humid areas: Does undercooling matter for the elderly? Building and Environment 263: 111871.
41. Wang Z, Zhang Y, Xia Y, Chen X, Liu J (2024) Study on personal comfort heating system and human thermal comfort in extremely low-temperature building environments. Building and Environment 259: 111640.
42. Vergerio G, Becchio C (2022) Pursuing occupants’ health and well-being in building management: Definition of new metrics based on indoor air parameters. Building and Environment 223: 109447.
43. Underhill LJ, Milando CW, Levy JI, Dols WS, Lee SK, et al. (2020) Simulation of indoor and outdoor air quality and health impacts following installation of energy-efficient retrofits in a multifamily housing unit. Building and Environment 170: 106507.
44. Mucha W, Mainka A, Brągoszewska E (2024) Impact of ventilation system retrofitting on indoor air quality in a single-family building. Building and Environment 262: 111830.
45. Mirrahimi S, Mohamed MF, Haw LC, Ibrahim NLN, Yusoff WFM, et al. (2016) The effect of building envelope on the thermal comfort and energy saving for high-rise buildings in hot-humid climate. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 53: 1508-1519.
46. Oh J, Wong W, Lacouture DC, Lee J, Koo C (2023) Indoor environmental quality improvement in green building: Occupant perception and behavioral impact. Journal of Building Engineering 69: 106314.
47. Yan S, Shi F, Zheng C, Ma Y, Huang J (2024) Whole biomass material envelope system for nearly-zero energy houses: Carbon footprint and construction cost assessment. Journal of Building Engineering 86: 108757.
48. Sutkowska M, Stefańska A, Vaverkova MD, Dixit S, Thakur A (2024) Recent advances in prefabrication techniques for biobased materials towards a low-carbon future: From modules to sustainability. Journal of Building Engineering 91: 109558.
49. Zou PX, Xu X, Sanjayan J, Wang J (2018) Review of 10 years research on building energy performance gap: Life-cycle and stakeholder perspectives. Energy and Buildings 178: 165-81.
50. Loonen RC, Trčka M, Cóstola D, Hensen JLM (2013) Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25: 483-93.
51. Hwang BG, Zhu L, Ming JTT (2017) Factors affecting productivity in green building construction projects: The case of Singapore. Journal of Management in Engineering 33(6): 04016052.
52. Ascione F, Rossi FD, Iovane T, Manniti G, Mastellone M (2024) Energy demand and air quality in social housing buildings: A novel critical review. Energy and Buildings 319: 114542.
53. Salam RA, Amber KP, Radial NI, Alam M, Akram N, et al. (2020) An overview on energy and development of energy integration in major South Asian countries: The building sector. Energies 13(21): 5776.
54. Khan MA, Wang CC, Lee CL (2021) A framework for developing green building rating tools based on Pakistan’s local context. Buildings 11(5): 202.
55. Mei X, Liu C, Li Z (2024) Research progress on functional, structural and material design of plant-inspired green bionic buildings. Energy and Buildings 316: 114357.
56. Ng WL, Azmi AM, Dahlan NY, Woon KS (2024) Predicting life cycle carbon emission of green office buildings via an integrated LCA-MLR framework. Energy and Buildings 316: 114345.
57. Nkini S, Nuyts E, Kassenga G, Swai O, Verbeeck G (2023) Comparative analysis of the energy performance in green and non-green office buildings in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Energy and Buildings 293: 113202.
58. Sharbafian M, Yeganeh M, Motie MB (2024) Evaluation of shading of green facades on visual comfort and thermal load of the building. Energy and Buildings 317: 114303.
59. Mangkuto RA, Rohmah M, Asri AD (2016) Design optimisation for window size, orientation, and wall reflectance with regard to various daylight metrics and lighting energy demand: A case study of buildings in the tropics. Applied Energy 164: 211-219.
60. Friess WA, Rakhshan K (2017) A review of passive envelope measures for improved building energy efficiency in the UAE. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 72: 485-96.
61. Sałęga AS, Wąs K (2021) Moisture risk analysis for three construction variants of a wooden inverted flat roof. Energies 14(23): 1-20.
62. Sozer H (2010) Improving energy efficiency through the design of the building envelope. Building and Environment 45(12): 2581-2593.
63. Williams NSG, Lundholm J, MacIvor JS (2014) Do green roofs help urban biodiversity conservation? Journal of Applied Ecology 51(6): 1643-1649.
64. Demertzi M, Garrido A, Dias AC, Arroja L (2015) Environmental performance of a cork floating floor. Materials and Design 82: 317-325.
65. Mousa A, Mahgoub M, Hussein M (2018) Lightweight concrete in America: Presence and challenges. Sustainable Production and Consumption 15: 131-44.
66. Helmy SH, Tahwia AM, Mahdy MG, Elrahman MA, Abed MA, et al. (2023) The use of recycled tire rubber, crushed glass, and crushed clay brick in lightweight concrete production: A review. Sustainability 15(13): 10060.
67. Junaid MF, Rehman Z, Kuruc M, Medveď I, Bačinskas D, et al. (2022) Lightweight concrete from a perspective of sustainable reuse of waste byproducts. Construction and Building Materials 319: 126061.
68. Samarasinghalage TI, Wijeratne WPU, Yang RJ, Wakefield R (2022) A multi-objective optimization framework for building-integrated PV envelope design balancing energy and cost. Journal of Cleaner Production 342: 130930.
69. Ham Y, Fard MG (2015) Mapping actual thermal properties to building elements in gbXML-based BIM for reliable building energy performance modeling. Automation in Construction 49: 214-24.
70. Jhumka H, Yang S, Gorse C, Wilkinson S, Yang R, et al. (2023) Assessing heat transfer characteristics of building envelope deployed BIPV and resultant building energy consumption in a tropical climate. Energy and Buildings 298: 113540.
71. Barone G, Buonomano A, Forzano C, Giuzio GF, Palombo A, et al. (2023) A new thermal comfort model based on physiological parameters for the smart design and control of energy-efficient HVAC systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 173: 113015.
72. Chadee A, Martin H, Gallage S, Rathnayake U (2023) Reducing cost overrun in public housing projects: A simplified reference class forecast for small island developing states. Buildings 13(4): 998.
73. Paek JH (2000) Running a profitable construction company: Revisited break-even analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering 16(3): 40-46.
74. Khan K, Shahzada K, Gul A, Khan IU, Eldin SM, et al. (2023) Seismic performance evaluation of plastered Cellular Lightweight Concrete (CLC) block masonry walls. Scientific Reports 13: 10770.
75. Sultana R, Rashedi A, Khanam T, Jeong B, Bandbafha HH, et al. (2022) Life cycle environmental sustainability and energy assessment of timber wall construction: A comprehensive overview. Sustainability 14(7): 4161.
76. Shehzad M, Younis A, Asif M, Hameed M (2023) Prospects of green roof technology as a sustainable solution to urban pollution index. Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 14: 100751.
77. Teran AAZ, Staddon C, Vito L, Gerlak AK, Ward S, et al. (2020) Challenges of mainstreaming green infrastructure in built environment professions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 63(4): 710-732.
78. Mayhoub MMG, Sayad ZMTE, Ali AAM, Ibrahim MG (2021) Assessment of green building materials’ attributes to achieve sustainable building façades using AHP. Buildings 11: 474.
79. Zuo J, Zhao ZY (2014) Green building research-current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30: 271-281.
80. Nasr Y, Zakhem HE, Hamami AEA, Bachawati ME, Belarbi R (2023) Comprehensive review of innovative materials for sustainable buildings’ energy performance. Energies 16: 7440.
81. Mendiola LL, León LDL, Rodríguez GAV (2022) Municipal solid waste as a substitute for virgin materials in the construction industry: A review. Sustainability 24: 16343.
82. Meyer C (2009) The greening of the concrete industry. Cement and Concrete Composites 31(8): 601-605.
83. Krueger K, Stoker A, Gaustad G (2019) “Alternative” materials in the green building and construction sector: Examples, barriers, and environmental analysis. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment 8(4): 270-291.
84. Sormunen P, Kärki T (2019) Recycled construction and demolition waste as a possible source of materials for composite manufacturing. Journal of Building Engineering 24: 100742.
85. Saghafi MD, Teshnizi ZSH (2011) Recycling value of building materials in building assessment systems. Energy and Buildings 43(11): 3181-3188.
86. Wong JKW, Zhou J (2015) Enhancing environmental sustainability over building life cycles through green BIM: A review. Automation in Construction 57: 156-165.
87. Jackson LE (2003) The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landscape and Urban Planning 64(4): 191-200.
88. Akadiri PO, Chinyio EA, Olomolaiye PO (2012) Design of a sustainable building: A conceptual framework for implementing sustainability in the building sector. Buildings 2: 126-152.
89. Hoang CP, Kinney KA, Corsi RL (2009) Ozone removal by green building materials. Building and Environment 44(8): 1627-1633.
90. Shi Y, Liu X (2019) Research on the literature of green building based on the web of science: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace (2002-2018). Sustainability 11: 3716.
91. Joseph P, McNally ST (2010) Sustainable non-metallic building materials. Sustainability 2(2): 400-427.
92. Ulubeyli S, Kazanci O (2018) Holistic sustainability assessment of green building industry in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production 202: 197-212.
93. Cheng YH, Lin CC, Hsu SC (2015) Comparison of conventional and green building materials in respect of VOC emissions and ozone impact on secondary carbonyl emissions. Building and Environment 87: 274-282.
94. Fadeyi MO (2015) Ozone in indoor environments: Research progress in the past 15 years. Sustainable Cities and Society 18: 78-94.
95. Cetin KS, Novoselac A (2015) Single and multi-family residential central all-air HVAC system operational characteristics in cooling-dominated climate. Energy and Buildings 96: 210-220.
96. Shehata N, Mohamed OA, Sayed ET, Abdelkareem MA, Olabi AG (2022) Geopolymer concrete as green building materials: Recent applications, sustainable development and circular economy potentials. Science of the Total Environment 836: 155577.
97. Nilimaa J (2023) Smart materials and technologies for sustainable concrete construction. Developments in the Built Environment 15: 100177.
98. Munir Q, Abdulkareem M, Horttanainen M, Kärki T (2023) A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete produced from industrial side streams in comparison with traditional concrete. Science of the Total Environment 865: 161230.
99. Raza MH, Zhong RY (2022) A sustainable roadmap for additive manufacturing using geopolymers in the construction industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 186: 106592.
100. Balali A, Valipour A, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z (2020) Multi-criteria ranking of green materials according to the goals of sustainable development. Sustainability 12(22): 1-18.
101. Ismaeil EM (2024) Sustainability-based value engineering management as an integrated approach to construction projects. Buildings 4: 903.
102. Balali A, Kaltungo AY, Edwards R (2023) A systematic review of passive energy consumption optimisation strategy selection for buildings through multiple criteria decision-making techniques. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 171: 113013.
103. Dai Y, Solangi YA (2023) Evaluating and prioritizing the green infrastructure finance risks for sustainable development in China. Sustainability 15(9): 1-18.
104. Frasca F, Bartolucci B, Parracha JL, Ogut O, Mendes MP, et al. (2023) A quantitative comparison on the use of thermal insulation materials in three European countries through the TEnSE approach: Challenges and opportunities. Building and Environment 245: 110973.
105. Ranjbar N, Balali A, Valipour A, Kaltungo AY, Edwards R, et al. (2021) Investigating the environmental impact of reinforced-concrete and structural-steel frames on sustainability criteria in green buildings. Journal of Building Engineering 43: 103184.
106. Sangmesh B, Patil N, Jaiswal KK, Gowrishankar TP, Selvakumar KK, et al. (2023) Development of sustainable alternative materials for the construction of green buildings using agricultural residues: A review. Construction and Building Materials 368: 130457.
107. Sandanayake M, Gunasekara C, Law D, Zhang G, Setunge S, et al. (2020) Sustainable criterion selection framework for green building materials-an optimisation-based study of fly-ash geopolymer concrete. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 25.
108. Rabbat C, Awad S, Villot A, Rollet D, Andrès Y (2022) Sustainability of biomass-based insulation materials in buildings: Current status in France, end-of-life projections, and energy recovery potentials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 156: 111962.
109. Yang B, Lv Z, Wang F (2022) Digital twins for intelligent green buildings. Buildings 12(6): 856.
110. Navaratnam S, Nguyen K, Selvaranjan K, Zhang G, Mendis P, et al. (2022) Designing post-COVID-19 buildings: Approaches for achieving healthy buildings. Buildings 12(1): 74.
111. Shaikh PH, Nor NB, Nallagownden P, Elamvazuthi I, Ibrahim T (2014) A review on optimized control systems for building energy and comfort management of smart sustainable buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 34: 409-429.
112. Boodi A, Beddiar K, Benamour M, Amirat Y, Benbouzid M (2018) Intelligent systems for building energy and occupant comfort optimization: A state of the art review and recommendations. Energies 11(10): 2604.
113. Griego D, Krarti M, Guerrero AH (2012) Optimization of energy efficiency and thermal comfort measures for residential buildings in Salamanca, Mexico. Energy and Buildings 54: 540-549.
114. Le DL, Salomone R, Nguyen QT (2023) Circular bio-based building materials: A literature review of case studies and sustainability assessment methods. Building and Environment 244: 110774.
115. Hoang AT, Nguyen XP (2021) Integrating renewable sources into energy system for smart city as a sagacious strategy towards clean and sustainable process. Journal of Cleaner Production 305: 127161.
116. Rezaie B, Esmailzadeh E, Dincer I (2011) Renewable energy options for buildings: Case studies. Energy and Buildings 43(1): 56-65.
117. Ellabban O, Rub HA, Blaabjerg F (2014) Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 39: 748-764.
118. Zhang S, Ocłoń P, Klemeš JJ, Michorczyk P, Pielichowska K, et al. (2022) Renewable energy systems for building heating, cooling, and electricity production with thermal energy storage. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 165: 112560.
119. Mattoni B, Guattari C, Evangelisti L, Bisegna F, Gori P, et al. (2018) Critical review and methodological approach to evaluate the differences among international green building rating tools. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82(Part 1): 950-960.
120. Awadh O (2017) Sustainability and green building rating systems: LEED, BREEAM, GSAS, and Estidama critical analysis. Journal of Building Engineering 11: 25-29.
121. Lima L, Trindade E, Alencar L, Alencar M, Silva L (2021) Sustainability in the construction industry: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production 289: 125730.
122. Tagliabue LC, Cecconi FR, Maltese S, Rinaldi S, Ciribini ALC, et al. (2021) Leveraging digital twin for sustainability assessment of an educational building. Sustainability 13(2): 1-16.
123. Shan M, Hwang BG (2018) Green building rating systems: Global reviews of practices and research efforts. Sustainable Cities and Society 39: 172-180.
124. Fatourehchi D, Zarghami E (2020) Social sustainability assessment framework for managing sustainable construction in residential buildings. Journal of Building Engineering 32: 101761.
125. Cordero AS, Melgar SG, Márquez JMA (2019) Green building rating systems and the new framework level (s): A critical review of sustainability certification within Europe. Energies 13(1): 66.
126. Owojori OM, Okoro CS, Chileshe N (2021) Current status and emerging trends on the adaptive reuse of buildings: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 13(21): 11646.
127. Owojori OM, Okoro C (2022) The private sector role as a key supporting stakeholder towards circular economy in the built environment: A scientometric and content analysis. Buildings 12(5): 695.
128. Vardopoulos I (2022) Industrial building adaptive reuse for museum. Factors affecting visitors’ perceptions of the sustainable urban development potential. Building and Environment 222: 109391.
129. Schützenhofer S, Kovacic I, Rechberger H, Mack S (2022) Improvement of environmental sustainability and circular economy through construction waste management for material reuse. Sustainability 14(17): 1-19.
130. Madessa HB, Shakerin M, Reinskau EH, Rabani M (2024) Recent progress in the application of energy technologies in large-scale building blocks: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Conversion and Management 305: 118210.
131. Punitha K, Rahman A, Radhamani AS, Nuvvula RS, Shezan SA, et al. (2024) An optimization algorithm for embedded raspberry Pi Pico controllers for solar tree systems. Sustainability 16(9): 1-26.
132. Tuerk A, Frieden D, Neumann C, Latanis K, Tsitsanis A, et al. (2021) Integrating plus energy buildings and districts with the EU energy community framework: Regulatory opportunities, barriers, and technological solutions. Buildings 11(10): 468.
133. Sassenou LN, Olivieri L, Olivieri F (2024) Challenges for positive energy districts deployment: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 191: 114152.
134. Ahmed S, Ali A, Angola AD (2024) A review of renewable energy communities: Concepts, scope, progress, challenges, and recommendations. Sustainability 16(5): 1-34.
135. Mohamed R, Boyle R, Yang AY, Tangari J (2017) Adaptive reuse: A review and analysis of its relationship to the 3 Es of sustainability. Facilities 35(3/4): 138-154.
136. Arfa FH, Lubelli B, Zijlstra H, Quist W (2022) Criteria of “effectiveness” and related aspects in adaptive reuse projects of heritage buildings. Sustainability 14(3): 1-22.
137. Vardopoulos I (2023) Adaptive reuse for sustainable development and land use: A multivariate linear regression analysis estimating key determinants of public perceptions. Heritage 6(2): 809-828.
138. Sanchez B, Rausch C, Haas C, Saari R (2020) A selective disassembly multi-objective optimization approach for adaptive reuse of building components. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 154: 104605.
139. Aigwi IE, Duberia A, Nwadike AN (2023) Adaptive reuse of existing buildings as a sustainable tool for climate change mitigation within the built environment. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 56: 102945.
140. Dişli G, Ankaralıgil B (2023) Circular economy in the heritage conservation sector: An analysis of circularity degree in existing buildings. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 56: 103126.
141. Yalaz ET, Dişli G (2024) Climate-responsive building façade design: Inspirations from historic buildings in semi-cold climate zone. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 69: 103914.
142. Gregorio SD, Vita MD, Paris A (2023) Industrial heritage rethinking: Flexibility design for eco-friendly environments. Buildings 13(4): 1048.
143. Shi Y, Liu X (2019) Research on the literature of green building based on the Web of Science: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace (2002-2018). Sustainability 11(13): 1-22.
144. Darko A, Chan APC, Ameyaw EE, He BJ, Olanipekun AO (2017) Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: The United States green building experts’ perspectives. Energy and Buildings 144: 320-332.
145. Chan APC, Darko A, Olanipekun AO, Ameyaw EE (2018) Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 1067-1079.
146. Qin Y, Xu Z, Wang X, Škare M (2022) Green energy adoption and its determinants: A bibliometric analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 153: 111780.
147. Ikram M, Ferasso M, Sroufe R, Zhang Q (2021) Assessing green technology indicators for cleaner production and sustainable investments in a developing country context. Journal of Cleaner Production 322: 129090.
148. Darko A, Chan APC, Yang Y, Shan M, He BJ, et al. (2018) Influences of barriers, drivers, and promotion strategies on green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The Ghanaian case. Journal of Cleaner Production 200: 687-703.
149. He BJ (2019) Towards the next generation of green building for urban heat island mitigation: Zero UHI impact building. Sustainable Cities and Society 50: 101647.
150. Arango DC, Jaramillo SB, Monsalve PA, Hernández AV, Botero LFB (2019) Relationships between lean and sustainable construction: Positive impacts of lean practices over sustainability during construction phase. Journal of Cleaner Production 234: 1322-1337.
151. Darko A, Chan AP (2016) Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals. Habitat International 57: 53-63.
152. Häkkinen T, Belloni K (2011) Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building Research and Information 39(3): 239-255.
153. Francis A, Thomas A (2020) Exploring the relationship between lean construction and environmental sustainability: A review of existing literature to decipher broader dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production 252: 119913.
154. Agyekum K, Adinyira E, Baiden B, Ampratwum G, Duah D (2019) Barriers to the adoption of green certification of buildings: A thematic analysis of verbatim comments from built environment professionals. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology 17(5): 1035-1055.
155. Debrah C, Chan AP, Darko A (2022) Artificial intelligence in green building. Automation in Construction 137: 104192.
156. Debrah C, Chan APC, Darko A (2022) Green finance gap in green buildings: A scoping review and future research needs. Building and Environment 207: 108443.
157. Norouzi M, Chàfer M, Cabeza LF, Jiménez L, Boer D (2021) Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis. Journal of Building Engineering 44: 102704.
158. Oluleye BI, Chan DW, Saka AB, Olawumi TO (2022) Circular economy research on building construction and demolition waste: A review of current trends and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production 357: 131927.
159. Doan DT, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Naismith N, Zhang T, Ghaffarianhoseini A, et al. (2017) A critical comparison of green building rating systems. Building and Environment 123: 243-260.