Graham Brodie*, Dorin Gupta and Muhammad Jamal Khan
Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia
*Corresponding author: Graham Brodie, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia
Submission: June 28, 2021;Published: July 15, 2021
ISSN:2640-9208Volume6 Issue1
Soil is the foundation of agricultural and horticultural endeavors. The soil solution is a
heterogeneous mixture of solids, liquids, gasses, and biological entities. The general health
and nutritional status of soil determines the quantity and quality of its biological components,
especially the plants that grow in it. The presence of pests and pathogens can impact soil
health, leading to significant crop yield losses [1]. Various strategies are used to control
pests and pathogens; however, modern agriculture has largely resorted to chemical control
strategies.
Chemical pest control has been a blessing; however, the development of chemical
resistance in the target pests and pathogens has been inevitable [2,3]. Various alternative
control strategies have been explored, including soil heating. Soil steaming [4-6] and surface
heating through flaming [7] or solarization have been explored; however, soil is a relatively
poor conductor of heat [8] and the efficacy of soil heating systems is limited because of this.
Microwave heating has also been considered, because microwaves volumetrically interact
with materials and generates heat throughout the interaction volume, thus avoiding thermal
conduction limits.
Microwaves are a form of light (electromagnetic energy), with wavelengths between 1cm and 1m long [9]. These wavelengths are invisible to humans; however, they strongly interact with dipolar molecules and ionic solutions, generating internal heat due to molecular agitation of these molecules in the electromagnetic field [10]. The extent of interaction between an electromagnetic field and a material depends on the material’s dielectric properties. Water is of interest to microwave heating because it has quite high dielectric properties at microwave wavelengths [10]. This is enhanced because water is a strong solvent of salts, creating ionic solutions, which greatly increases the loss factor of the dielectric properties [10]; however, the water molecule itself has a strong dipolar moment [11]. In the case of microwave treatment of soil, the water in the soil solution and the biological entities in the soil strongly interreact with the microwave fields to generate heat in the soil.
The propagation of microwave energy through soil depends upon the gravimetric (θg)
and volumetric (θv) moisture content [12], bulk density [13], organic matter content [14], soil
texture [15], and specific heat of the soil [8]. Soil moisture has the most effect on microwave
soil heating [16]. The greatest challenge when heating soil, in-situ, is that the microwave
energy must be projected into the soil rather than the soil being placed into a microwave
oven cavity. Several devices, called applicators [9,17], can be used to apply microwave energy
to a semi-infinite solid, like soil. The simplest option is to use an antenna, pointing to the
ground [18]. The horn antenna is a very simple structure that has been used for soil heating for several decades [18,19]. Horn antennas are effective, but often
heat more soil than is necessary for disinfection.
Novel applicator structures have been developed to restrict
the application of microwave energy to the surface layers of the
soil [20,21]. Slow-wave structures [21] and applicators based
on the principle of frustrated total internal reflection [22] create
evanescent microwave fields that propagate along the surface of
the applicators, but do not penetrate very far into the soil, because
of the exponential decay of the evanescent microwave fields. These
heat the surface layers of the soil without wasting energy heating
deeper layers of soil.
Davis et al. [23] demonstrated the efficacy of microwave energy
for weed management. They developed a prototype system, called
the “Zapper” [24], which could treat soil in situ, using a variant on
a horn antenna to apply the microwave energy to the soil’s surface.
To obtain consistent pre-emergent control of both broadleaved
weeds and grasses, it was necessary to apply at least 183J cm-
2. Brodie et al. [25] later confirmed that 185J cm-2 of microwave
energy, when applied to moist soil, could effectively kill various
Lolium spp. (ryegrasses) seeds to a depth of 5cm. Treating seeds in
dry soil required over 550J cm-2 of microwave energy to kill seeds
to a depth of only 2-3cm [25].
The energy required to control emerged weeds using a horn
antenna is quite variable (77-500J cm-2) [23,26], depending in the
species and the height of the horn antenna above the ground. Recent
experiments using a 15 cm wide slow-wave applicator, connected
to a 5-kW microwave source, and being towed at an equivalent
speed of approximately 0.6km hr-1 (17cm s-1), has demonstrated
that applying 20J cm-2 of microwave energy can kill most emerged
weeds (unpublished).
It has been demonstrated that microwave soil heating has
an immediate impact on soil microbial communities [27]. The
populations of some species are significantly reduced [28]; however,
other species, including nitrifying bacteria and archaea, are
relatively unaffected, except at extremely high doses of microwave
energy [29-31]. Soil bacterial and fungal community compositions
change significantly due to microwave soil treatment and recovery
of biological diversity takes more than 4-5 weeks [30]. Recent
experiments have demonstrated that microwave soil treatments,
with similar intensity necessary to kill weed seeds, significantly
reduces a number of soils borne fungal pathogens, including
Fusarium spp., Macrophomina phaseolina, and Thielaviopsis basicola
(unpublished).
The combination of removal of weed competition and soil
disinfection provided by microwave soil treatment results in
significant crop yield increases. In field experiments, increases
in crop yield of between 18 % and 84%, compared with the
untreated or hand weeded controls, have been observed [1,32].
Pot experiments have demonstrated that a single microwave soil
treatment can provide significant crop yield increases over several
seasons, with the longest observations spanning three years, so far
[33].
Sustained experimental work has demonstrated that microwave energy can be used to effectively control weeds. Soil heating can inactivate dormant weed seeds, thus preventing germination and emergence; however, soil heating requires high energy inputs to achieve seed lethality. An additional benefit of microwave soil treatment is it potential to sanitise soil by changing the soil bacterial and fungal community profile. Microwave treatment does not sterilise the soil; however, it can reduce the populations of several economically important soil borne pathogens and significantly increase crop yields. Soil sanitation may find its application niche in high value horticulture, where soil fumigation is routinely applied prior to crop establishment. Control of emerged weeds requires far less microwave energy, especially when novel microwave applicators such as the slow-wave and frustrated total internal reflection principles, are adopted in their design.
© 2021 Graham Brodie. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.