Tong Zhao* and Govindaraj Dev Kumar
Center for Food Safety, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, USA
*Corresponding author:Tong Zhao, Center for Food Safety, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, USA
Submission: June 04, 2019; Published: June 10, 2019
ISSN : 2688-836XVolume1 Issue1
Organic acids-based interventions are commonly used by the food industry, especially in poultry and meats for mitigating foodborne pathogens and reducing microbial loads (log reductions). The bactericidal effect of acids is generally caused by its low pH. Acetic, butyric, citric, octanoic, lactic, levulinic, propionic, phenyllactic acid, and acidic calcium sulfate have been shown to have lethality against Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms. Studies have indicated that the applications of acids in different foods have resulted in various log reduction of foodborne pathogens and spoilage microorganisms. However, the efficacy of acid-based interventions is challenged by the development of acid tolerance in bacteria, such as Escherichia coli O157:H7, which have been implicated in outbreaks associated with acidic foods, such as apple cider, sausages, and tomato ketchup. For pursuing an effective alternative to commonly used acidic sanitizers that is, easy-to-use, cost effective, and environmentally friendly, a microbicide, composed of two Generally Recognized as Safe chemicals, levulinic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was developed. Its novel bactericidal efficacy (>6 log bacteria CFU/ml within 1 min) and ability to remove biofilms formed by various human pathogens, including E coli O157:H7, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus, and methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) revealed in various studies.
Keywords: Pathogens; Intervention; Phenyllactic acid; Antimicrobial activity; Levulinic acid
Recently, organic acid-based intervention procedures have been used in various foods, poultry and meat surface, and food processing facilities for reduction of food borne pathogens and microbial loads. Among them, lactic acid is the acid of choice because it is odorless. The common explanation for its antibacterial activity is the reduction of pH, resulting in a decrease in cytoplasmic pH of microbial cells by internalization of undissociated acid molecules. In order to keep intracellular pH at neutrality, bacterial cells have to pump out protons by hydrolyzing ATP, which depletes energy, thereby causing their death eventually. Some acids may produce specific killing effect on pathogens while affecting the organoleptic characteristic of the product.
Octanoic acid has been found to quickly kill inoculated pathogens in food. However, its application in food produces an undesirable odor affecting organoleptic properties of foods and in turn consumer acceptance. Different acids with various antimicrobial activity were combined and determined for their bactericidal effects on E coli O157:H7, O26:H11, and O111:NM in rumen content- or feces-contaminated drinking water for cattle. Three combinations, including (a) 0.1% lactic acid, 0.9% acidic calcium sulfate, and 0.05% caprylic acid; (b) 0.1% lactic acid, 0.9% acidic calcium sulfate, and 0.1% sodium benzoate; and (c) 0.1% lactic acid, 0.9 % acidic calcium sulfate, and 0.5% butyric acid were evaluated. Results revealed that all three combinations inactivated >5 log CFU E coli O157:H7, O26:H11, and O111:NM/ml(v/w) in water heavily contaminated with rumen content or feces within 30 min at 21oC. However, their applications are limited to the disinfection of cattle troughs and hardly used as the drinking water because their consumption amounts by cattle as the drink water were significantly lower than the water only group .
3-Phenyllactic acid (2-hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoic acid or β-phenyllactic acid), a derivative of lactic acid is present in honey in higher amount than other phenolic acids. Studies have indicated that phenyllactic acid is present in Thistle Unifloral honey at concentrations of 100 to 800mg/kg, in Ling Heather honey at 875mg/kg, and in Manuka honeys at 243mg/ kg. Lactic acid bacteria also produce Phenyllactic acid. Dieuleveux et al.  first reported its microbicidal effect in Geotrichum candidum. Later, it was confirmed that its antibacterial effect is broad spectrum against various Gram-positive bacteria, including staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Bacillus cereus, and Gram-negative bacteria, including Salmonella and Escherichia coli. In addition to its bactericidal effects, it also inhibits the growth on molds and yeast. We evaluated phenyllactic acid as a sanitizing agent for removal of biofilms produced by either Listeria monocytogenes or Enterobacter cloacae. Results indicated that 1% phenyllactic acid inactivated more than 6 log CFU/ml of inoculated Listeria monocytogenes and E cloacae within 10 min for planktonic cells at 21°C. The biofilm elimination assays demonstrated that the killing effect is closely related with the chemical concentrations and exposure time. A concentration of 1% phenyllactic acid effectively removed early mature biofilm after a 5-min treatment . The studies on the cell membrane permeability through confocal laser scanning microscopy, measurement of extracellular ATP and UVabsorbing substance, membrane potential depolarization, and flow cytometry analysis revealed that the killing mechanism of phenyllactic acid on bacteria is through cell membrane damage and leakage of the intracellular components . Because the fact that lethality to acid adopted E coli O157:H7 is reduced, as elucidated by its ability to survive in acidic foods, such as apple cider, mayonnaise, and fermented sausage. Food industry demand other effective sanitizers that can be easily adopted into their daily practice. For this purpose, we evaluate many different chemical combinations for their bactericidal effect on various human pathogens. One simple combination with novel antimicrobial activity was created and reported in 2009 by us [5,6]. This combination contains just two chemicals and both of them are classified as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) chemicals, levulinic acid and SDS. Individually, levulinic acid at 0.5% and SDS at 0.05% has no bactericidal effect. However, the solution with their combination produces substantially bactericidal effects on all tested microorganisms (>6 log CFU/ml within 1 min processing time), including Neisseria gonorrheae, and some spores, mold and yeast.
Its efficacy for controlling foodborne pathogens has been validated by different researchers from various countries, who have broadly evaluated its antimicrobial activity against E coli O157:H7, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, spores, and virus in produce, poultry, meat, and shrimp through a simple rinse procedure [7- 9]. Their results revealed its application significantly reduced the population of added foodborne pathogens and microbial loads. Its application in seeds for elimination of E coli O157:H7 and S Typhimurium DT 104 was compared with a treatment of 20,000 ppm of calcium hypochlorite (pH 11.4) or tap water. Similar inactivation rates for E coli O157:H7 and S Typhimurium were obtained after treatment of alfalfa seeds with 20,000 ppm of calcium hypochlorite and 0.5% levulinic acid plus 0.05% SDS (pH 3.0). However, the germination rates of treated seeds were significantly different. A treatment by 0.5% levulinic acid plus 0.05% SDS for 1 h at 21°C on alfalfa seeds yielded 80% germination rate, but the treatment by 20,000 ppm of calcium hypochlorite only yielded 47% germination rate .
The most specific characterization of its application by this novel combination of levulinic acid plus SDS is its strong potential for elimination of biofilm formed by various human pathogens on different materials. For food industry, it demonstrated strong ability to remove E coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and L monocytogenes in food processing facilities [5,10-14]. For dental industry, it showed fantastic better effects to remove biofilms induced by dental pathogens and microbial loads as a mouthwash than the commercially available mouthwashes. Animal model studies demonstrated that the tissues obtained from gum and mucus after long-term application of this novel bactericide show no pathological difference when compared with water only . For public health, it also demonstrated multi-log reduction on the biofilms formed by methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus.
An acid-based intervention for reduction of food borne pathogens in food industry is broadly applied in the food preservation, poultry, meat, and food processing facilities. The combination through various acids is developed to increase its efficacy to eliminate foodborne pathogens. However, its efficacy is gradually reduced because of appearance of acid-tolerant bacteria, such as E coli O157:H7. A brand-new bactericide just containing two chemicals was developed. Both chemicals are recommended by US Food and Drug Administration as safe to use, levulinic acid (GRAS, 21 CFR, 172.515) and SDS (as a multipurpose food additive (21 CFR 172.822). Its bactericidal efficacy in food, dental industry, and public health are tested by various studies in the world. Further evaluation, especially in public health, such as to prevent oral sextransmitted diseases as a mouthwash, to eliminate drug-resistant bacteria in hospital environments, as a surface sanitizer is needed for its efficacy validation.
The data presented here were supported by grants from Georgia Department of Agriculture, the State of Georgia’s Traditional Industries Program for Food Processing, American Meat Institute Foundation and United States Department of Agriculture-National Institute for Food and Agriculture.
© 2019 Tong Zhao. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.