Coillancarraig Lodge, Rocky Valley Drive, Kilmacanogue, Co Wicklow, Ireland
*Corresponding author:Gerald H Tomkin, Coillancoraig Lodge, Rocky valley Drive, Kilmacanogue, Ireland
Submission:March 12, 2019;Published: June 20, 2019
ISSN 2578-0263Volume3 Issue1
Obesity is commonly associated with type 2 diabetes. Weight reduction in obese subjects is effective in both preventing the onset of type 2 diabetes and in reversing the condition once present. GLP1 agonists have been shown to inhibit appetite both by delaying gastric emptying and increasing saiety at a central level. These drugs have been shown to delay the onset of type 2 diabetes, to reverse diabetes and to lower blood sugar in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Development of these drugs has resulted in prolongation of absorption so that they may be given by subcutaneous injections and more recently reports of an oral preparation of semaglutide that has similar efficacy to the subcutaneous preparation have appeared. The drugs have been shown to result in cardiovascular protection.
Keywords:Diabetes; Extendin 1,2,3,4; GLP-1 Receptor; DPP-4; Oral Semaglutide; Obesity
Abbreviations:VIP: Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide
Medical School did not teach us about lizards or if they did we failed to take notice. Now everyone is familiar with two venomous lizards, Heloderma suspectum (Gila monster) and close relative Heloderma horridium (Mexican bearded lizard). They live in the south of North America. The Gila monster is large, by lizard standards, being up to 700g and 22cm length. The venom is not fatal to adults but does cause severe pain, swelling, hypotension and lymphadenopathy. The venom contains more than a dozen peptides including serotonin and various vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-like proteins (Exendins 1.2 and 3) which bind to VIP receptors. Exendin 3 binds to a VIP receptor to stimulate amylase release [1,2]. In 1992 Eng et al.  predicted a receptor for Exendin 4. They wrote ‘The presence of the exendin receptor, although functionally undefined at the present time, predicts the existence of an endogenous mammalian analog to the exendin peptides”. Cloning and functional expression of the human islet GLP-1 receptor was described in 1993 Thorens et al. . In 1999 Xu et al.  showed that exendin-4 improved glucose tolerance in diabetic rats and increased betacell mass through both beta cell replication and neogenesis. Exendin 4 is a GLP-1 like protein with a 50% homology but with a much longer biological half-life. Szayna et al.  showed that exendin-4 reacts with the GLP-1 receptor to induce insulin release. Exendin -4 was found to be much more potent than GLP-1 with a much longer biological half-life. In Zucker fatty rats Exendin 4 was found to lower blood sugars but also to reduce food intake and reduce fat deposition. Edwards et al.  showed that GLP-1 reduced blood sugar and decreased energy intake in humans but the very short half-life due to rapid cleavage by the enzyme DPP-4 meant that the drug had to be given by intravenous infusion. Exendin -4 does not have this problem as the molecule is not disrupted by DPP-4 therefore the biological half-life is much longer, it was known that incretins are glucose dependent with regards to their insulin stimulation effect. Egan et al.  demonstrated that exendin 4 is a potent and long lasting insulinotropic agent in both non-diabetic and diabetic subjects using a glucose clamp method. In 2003 Exendin-4 given in bolus subcutaneous doses was shown to reduce blood sugars and HbA1c . Exendin 4 was shown to delay gastric emptying and reduce post prandial blood sugars in Type 1 diabetic patients .
A 30 week study of exenatide resulted in a modest weight loss of 1.6kg and an improvement in HbA1c of 0.86% . Exenatide was launched on the market in 2006 and was followed by other GLP agonists that had been adapted in various ways to resist degradation by DPP-4. More recently GLP1 agonists and Exenatide have been further adapted to increase their biological half-life and now are given by subcutaneous injection only once a week. Semaglutide has been adapted to resist gastric degradation by co formulation with an absorption enhancer sodium N-[8(2-hydroxylbenzoyl) amino] caprylate (SNAC). The drug is unusual for a small molecule in being absorbed in the stomach. This protects against enzymatic degradation via local buffering actions and may have implication for other therapeutic peptides that might be transformed from injectable to oral preparations . In a trial over a 26 week period the 2 highest doses or the oral agent was as effective in weight reduction as weekly subcutaneous semaglutide with a similar drop in HbA1c of 1.6% for the highest oral dose used. compared to the subcutaneous weekly injection. Gastro intestinal side effects were common especially with the higher doses but with slow escalation of dose similar rates of discontinuation occurred as compared to the subcutaneous route .
Liraglutide is another GLP-1 agonist. It is a derivative of GLP- 1 obtained by acylation of the GLP-1 molecule . The molecule is slowly released from the injection site and extensively bound to albumen which protects from degradation by DPP-4 while at the same time reducing renal clearance . In one of the first studies in human type 2 diabetes Juhl et al.  showed that once daily injection of this compound was effective in lowering glucose and delaying gastric emptying. In a 26 week study in Type 2 Diabetes, Liraglutide at the highest dose (1.8mg) reduced HbA1c by 1.0% and weight by 2.8kg . A more impressive reduction compared to exenatide as referenced above. In a comparison study of Liraglutide with exenatide over 26 weeks, liraglutide reduced HbA1c more than exenatide but post prandial glucose was less effectively controlled. Similar weight loss was recorded (-3.24kg viz -2.87kg) [18,19]. Another 26 week study comparing liraglutide to semaglutide showed semaglutide to have superior glucose lowering but with higher frequency of gastrointestinal adverse events.
A 3mg dose of liraglutide has been used in non-diabetic obese subjects to promote weight loss .The subjects were obese with BMI of 30kg/m2 or more and had pre-diabetes, or 27kg/m2 if they had co morbidities. Fifty% of subjects completed 160 weeks, 47% of the liraglutide subjects dropping out. Liraglutide subjects lost 4kg more than the controls, a very modest weight loss for subjects who were about 95kg at the start of the study. However, even this very modest weight reduction was associated with a prolongation of the time to development of diabetes. In a head to head study with semaglutide in obese subjects (BMI 30Kg/m2 or more) for 52 weeks the subjects on semaglutide lost 13.8% body weight at the highest dose of 0.4mg/day as compared to 7.8% for Liraglutide and 2.3% for the placebo arm . Eighty one percent of subjects completed the study. This study suggests that semaglutide has a considerable advantage over liraglutide in non-diabetic obese subjects, with a similar adverse and dropout rate. The study, of course, needs to be replicated for confirmation. The study suggests that longer follow up would result in even further weight loss.
Semaglutide is now available in a once a week formulation. In a 12 week study the weekly injection was shown to reduce fasting, post prandial and overall glucose and glucagon response. The drug increased insulin secretion rate . Once a week semaglutide was compared to exenatide extended release in a 56 week trial . Semaglutide, 1mg weekly, reduced HbA1c by 1.5% as compared to 0.9% with exenatide ER 2mg weekly. Body weight reduced by 5.6kg with semaglutide as compared to 1.9kg with Exenatide ER. There were more gastrointestinal adverse events with semaglutide (41.8% viz 33.3%). It is not known whether this formulation over more than 56 weeks will cause further weight reduction. In a 56 week trial in comparison to sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, semaglutide, 1mg weekly, reduced HbA1c by 1.6% and weight by 6.1kg from a starting weight of 89.5kg (SD 20.3) . Cardiovascular safety of oral semaglutide in patients with Type 2 diabetes is now being evaluated in the PIONEER 6 trial . Gastrointestinal side effects are common in all GLP -1 treatments due to delayed gastric emptying. Up to 27.2% of subjects experienced nausea or vomiting in the SUSTAIN 1 to 5 trials . The Authors of this study suggested that the contribution of nausea or vomiting to the weight loss was minor. In real-life settings efficacy and adherence of GLP-1 receptor agonists for treatment of type 2 diabetes may not be satisfactory. A review recently  ended by suggesting that regular re-evaluations of treatment including response, tolerability, adherence, cost and quality of life, are necessary.
Diabetic patients are at high risk for cardiovascular events and there have been instances when drugs that should be theoretically cardioprotective have turned out to increase the risk of cardiovascular events. Thus, there is a lot of interest in studying the cardiovascular outcomes in any new diabetic medications. It seems that GLP1 agonists have some degree of cardiovascular protection. A meta analysis of cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes found evidence of cardiovascular safety across all GLP-1 receptor agonist cardiovascular outcome trials and reduction in adverse cardiovascular events (Cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke) . In a review of cardiovascular outcome trials of glucose-lowering medications Home  suggested that GLP-1 receptor agonists should be offered to all type 2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease. The mechanisms involved have been recently explored by Rakipovski et al. . They found in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice that liraglutide and semaglutide modified plaque atherosclerotic progression. Further studies treating the mice with semaglutide revealed reversal of many of the genes involved in inflammation and plaque formation affected by a Western type atherosclerosis diet. The pathways included leucocyte recruitment, leucocyte rolling, adhesion/extravasation, cholesterol metabolism, lipid mediated signaling, extracellular matrix protein turnover and plaque haemorrhage. Cardiovascular benefit from GLP-1 agonists may not be the same for all ethnic groups. Kang et al.  found that in a meta analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials Asian populations may do better.
Rapid reduction of blood sugars in patients with poorly controlled diabetes may provoke retinopathy with exudate formation and a reduction of visual acuity. However, these changes are transitory and do not cause permanent damage. A 104 week study of semaglutide once a week at either a dose of 0.5mg or 1mg has now being evaluated in the SUSTAIN-6 study . Eighty three percent of the patients had pre-existing retinopathy at base line. Rates of retinopathy complications were increased in the semaglutide patients (3% viz 1.8% in the placebo group) Rates of new or worsening nephropathy were lower in the semaglutide group. It is difficult to understand why semaglutide might worsen retinopathy but further studies are necessary as the numbers in this study too few to make firm conclusions. Vilsboll et al.  evaluated diabetic retinopathy data from across the SUSTAIN clinical trial program. They concluded that the worsening diabetic retinopathy in SUSTAIN 6 which was not found in SUSTAIN 1 to 5 may have been due to the rapidity and magnitude of improvement in glycaemic control. However, the reduction in HbA1c in the 1mg semaglutide group was only 1% more than the placebo group and there was no significant difference in hypoglycaemia episodes between the semaglutide and the placebo groups.
Two venemous lizards have come to the aid of type 2 diabetic patients. GLP-1 agonists are useful in both lowering blood sugar and in cardiovascular and renal protection. A recent trial of once weekly semaglutide suggests that this drug may be the most effective in weight reduction and it is exciting that an oral preparation with similar efficacy to the subcutaneous injectable form may come to the market soon. The gastrointestinal side effects causing the high dropout rate in clinical trials necessitates considerable discussion and persuasion with many patients. Although the drugs have few other side effects, there is a concern in just one trial about the progression of retinopathy. This concern will be assessed in further trials. The prevention of onset of diabetes in type 2 subjects, suggests a wider use of this class of drugs.
© 2019 Gerald HT. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.