Full Text

Interventions in Obesity & Diabetes

Framingham Heart Study: A Review of Research Design

Urooj Tahir*

MPHIL (Food & Nutrition Science), University of Punjab, Pakistan

*Corresponding author: Urooj Tahir, MPHIL (Food & Nutrition Science), University of Punjab, Pakistan

Submission: February 07, 2018; Published: February 21, 2018

DOI: 10.31031/IOD.2018.01.000505

ISSN: 2578-0263
Volume1 Issue1

Contents

Original Cohort

    i. Objectives

    ii. Sampling

    iii. Examination

    iv. Maintenance of validity

    v. Advanced Screening Tools

Comparison of

Original Cohort, Offspring Cohort & New offspring spouse Cohort, Third Generation Cohort, Omni Cohort 1 & Omni Cohort 2

Supporters

    i. U.S. Public Health Service

    ii. National Heart Institute, NIH

    iii. Contract with Boston University and NHLBI

Original Cohort 1948

Cohort study

A group of individuals with a common characteristic or sharing same experiences who are followed over a period of time [1].

e.g. Framingham Heart Study is a prospective investigation of the epidemiology of CHD.

It is a population based open cohort (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Purpose

To study the epidemiology of CHD

Objectives

    i. To study the incidence and prevalence and risk factors of cardiovascular disease (CVD)

    ii. To study familial patterns , trends in CVD incidence and its risk factors over time

    iii. To estimate the incidence rates of disease and to describe the natural history of cardiovascular disease (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Characteristics that made Framingham suitable for a long-term epidemiological study. Feinlieb (1983).

The Framingham investigators have always been aware that the site may not be representative of the United States and have made repeatedly comparisons with other regions to test its generalizability (Figure 3-9).

Figure 3

Sample Size

Total population of town (30-62 years) =10,000.

Figure 4: Project Organization.

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9: Sampling.

Desired sample size = 6,000

Because only 6,000 exams could be given in this two year cycle

So a 2/3rd sampling ratio was applied to yield the 6,000.

They estimated that 5,000 would be free of CVD at the baseline exam, a large enough sample to produce statistically stable data (Tablel & 2).

Table 1: Response of the Selected Sample.

Table 2: Response Rate 68.7%.

Consent

The documentation of informed consent began in 1971 1st exam cycle of the Offspring Cohort and then the 12th exam cycle of the Original Cohort [2-5]. The research protocols of the Framingham Heart Study are reviewed annually by the Institutional Review Board of the Boston University Medical Center and by the Observational Studies Monitoring Board of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.

    I agree to

    i. Participate in the FHS clinic examination and studies

    ii. Provide a blood sample from which genetic material (DNA and other components) to be used in the genetic studies

    iii. To allow researchers from commercial companies to have access to my DNA and genetic data this may be used to develop new lab tests or treatments.

Research Design

Pre-Testing (September 29, 1948)

The FHS examined its own staff members.

Exam (October 11, 1948)

Follow up

Figure 10: Research Design

Figure 11: Research Design

Biennial examinations of subjects (for morbidity and mortality development) (Figure 10-17).

Figure 12:

Figure 13:

Figure 14:

Figure 15:

Figure 16:

Validity Maintenance

    i. A Clinic Protocol Manual

    ii. Periodic "site visits"

    iii. A separate Pulmonary Function Manual

    iv. Biochemical analysis

    Roster of families - first FHS exam records

    v. All diagnoses were verified

    vi. Review of each death

Figure 17

Failure to appear for re-examination

    i. Kept track of the clinical status by community surveillance [6].

    ii. Persons who moved out were likely to be healthier

    iii. Persons who stopped coming while still resident were seriously, even terminally, ill (Table 3).

Table 3: Advanced Screening Tools.

Offspring Cohort

Figure 18

A prospective epidemiologic study of CHD in young adults to study familial clustering of the disease and its risk factors [7].

1971-1975: Follow up after 4 years (Figure 18 & 19).

Third Generation Cohort

To gather phenotypic and genotypic information

2002-2005: Follow up after every 6 years. Participants in the Offspring Cohort at their 6th and 7th examination cycles provided updated lists:

Figure 19: Recruitment Process.

Family description form

    i. Names

    ii. Relationships

    iii. Residential addresses

    iv. Telephone numbers

    v. Gender

    vi. Birth dates of their children

    vii. Identification

    viii. Dissemination of study objectives to the community

    ix. Invitation

    x. Examination of consenting participants

Primary focus

To study large multi generational extended family groups. 3,975 /4,095 participants were members of 879 larger FHS extended families (Figure 20).

Figure 20: Recruitment Process.

New offspring Spouse Cohort

Addition of the data and cell lines of Offspring Spouse Cohort to improve the statistical power for studying families at FHS, 20032005 [8].

Recruitment Criteria

    i. Spouses of Offspring cohort participants who were not initially enrolled

    ii. With at least two children in the Third Generation cohort.

Omni Cohort

    Omni Cohort 1 1994

    Omni Cohort

Omni Cohort

    i. Officially known as minority over sampling

    ii. Ethnic minority residents of Framingham

    iii. A minority group in this study is considered one that is racially distinct from the original cohort, which was defined as white.

Omni Cohort 1

Need to establish a new group of participants reflecting the increasing diversity of the community (Figure 21)

Figure 21: Omni Cohort 1.

Omni Cohort 2 (2005)

Purpose: To allow an ethnically diverse comparable cohort to the Generation III cohort.

Recruitment criteria: No relationship to someone in the first generation had to be claimed to be able to participate (Table 4-8).

Table 4: Purpose

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8:

References

  1. Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FE (1951) Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health Nations Health 41(3): 279-281.
  2. Framingham Heart Study (2015) A project of the national heart, lung and blood institute and Boston university, USA.
  3. Mahmood SS, Levy D, Vasan RS, Wang TJ (2014) The framingham heart study and the epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases: a historical perspective. Lancet 383(9921): 999-1008.
  4. Gordon, Tavia and Kannel, William B (1968) The Framingham Study: An Epidemiological Investigation of Cardiovascular Disease, Section 1 and 2. Bethesda: National Heart Institute.
  5. Ralph BD & William B. Epidemiological background and design: the framingham study.
  6. https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/static/studies/shhs/SHHS%201_M00. pdf#search=omni+cohort+research+design
  7. Splansky GL, Corey D, Yang Q, Atwood LD, Cupples LA, et al. (2007). The Third Generation Cohort of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study: Design, Recruitment, and Initial Examination. Am J Epidemiol 165(11): 1328-1335.
  8. https://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/researchers/description- data/data/tableofexams.pdf


About Crimson

We at Crimson Publishing are a group of people with a combined passion for science and research, who wants to bring to the world a unified platform where all scientific know-how is available read more...

Leave a comment

Contact Info

  • Crimson Publishers, LLC
  • 555 Madison Avenue, 5th floor
  •     New York, NY 10022, USA
  • +1 (929) 600-8049
  • +1 (929) 447-1137
  • info@crimsonpublishers.com
  • www.crimsonpublishers.com