Kholodnov VA1 and Viktorov АА2*
1Kotelnikov Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia
2State Research Center Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Russia
*Corresponding author: Viktorov АА, State Research Center Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Russia
Submission: June 02, 2020;Published: July 12, 2020
ISSN 2578-0093Volume6 Issue2
Dementia is one of the most prevalent diseases in the older population. Some studies have highlighted the importance of early screening in the aged population for the timely diagnosis. On the other hand, the numbers analyzed still demonstrate a poor aptitude of the doctors involved in dealing with the early diagnosis of dementia at the forefront, with a potential diagnostic delay that generates lengthening of both the waiting lists and the timing of the start of treatments, with relapses on patient health and on the effectiveness of the treatments themselves. Greater awareness of the topic is needed through knowledge of the phenomenon as well as a larger number of studies conducted directly on the Territory.
Keywords: Dementia; Interprofessional education; Patient care; Sofware; Primary care
Some studies such as EVIDEM-ED (Evidence based Interventions in Dementia in the community-Early Diagnosis) [1,2] or TRELONG (Treviso Longeva Study) [3] have highlighted the importance of early screening in the aged population for the timely diagnosis of dementia, the process of which in Primary Care is still delayed. The General Practitioner (GP) represents the first step in the value chain: they will identify in their practice [4], patients at risk or who demonstrate a suspected dementing disease, they study them (imaging, blood test) [5] and they refer them to UVA (Unit for Evaluation of Alzheimer’s) for the diagnostic-therapeutic follow-up inspections [6,7].
We wanted to confirm GP’s attitude and management system in the dementia field: 20 GPs (17311 patients) have been interviewed and management procedures and timetables have been examined.
All the GPs worked with multiple management software: 6 among them used FPF®, 5 MilleWin®, 4 Perseo®, 3 Profim®, 2 Medico 2000®; 1 GP used them only for prescriptions and notepapers for the left over clinic evaluation; 4 GPs used a computer program also as assistance for clinical governance (3 are part of research network Health Search, 1 employs GPG® software), 1 often made self-audit. All the interviewees were privy to UVA, to their allocation and how to use it. Most GPs (60%) referred the suspect dementia patient directly to UVA without doing a blood test; 3 GPs had prescribed at least one imaging exam (computed tomography, CT; magnetic resonance imaging-MRI-of the brain) before the referral: This also has repercussions on UVA workload: waiting lists extend beyond 6 months for medical examination; staff shortages can occur; closure in the placement of new patients within UVA for Lazio Region; difficulties for relatives to accompany patients for each visit. The database inspection showed 79 patients with a dementia encodes diagnosis. It is important to note that 3 of the GPs proceeded with a detailed patient evaluation, for example using the Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment, Mini-mental State Examination or Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, (2 of these GPs are working with “Health Search” network) making use of MilleWin® software (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Screenshot of a General Practice Program. Scores and scales are clearly visible, including those for assessing dementia.
© 2020 Viktorov АА. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.