T
Boru Jia1,2*
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, China
2 Newcastle University,UK
*Corresponding author:Boru Jia,Department of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China,Sir Joseph Swan Centre for Energy Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
Submission: June 12, 2018;Published: June 27, 2018
ISSN: 2640-9690Volume1 Issue1
The free-piston engine (FPE) is a linear engine in which the requirement for a crankshaft system is eliminated and the piston assembly has a free and linear motion[1]. First proposed around 1930, FPEs were in use in the period 1930-1960 as air compressors and gas generators and provided some advantages over presenttime conventional combustion engines and gas turbine systems[2]. They are known to have a greater thermal efficiency (40-50%) than an equivalent and more conventional reciprocating engine (30-40%)[3]. A driving force behind the interest in free-piston engine generators is the automotive industry’s increasing interest in hybrid-electric vehicle technology. Much work has been undertaken by number of research groups worldwide, including the authors’ group, to explore the operation characteristics of FPEs[4,5].After initial investigations and development of freepiston related products during the early to mid-20th century, recent advances in control and real time actuation systems have enabled the technology to become a viable alternative to reciprocating technologies, and as such, research is now being carried out by number of groups worldwide [3,6-9]. Modern applications of the FPE concept have been proposed for the generation of electric and hydraulic power, typically in hybrid electric vehicles[10-15]. Known FPE applications include electric generators, hydraulic pumps and air compressors[2], which are summarised in the Table 1 below.
Table 1: FPE applications.
For FPEs, the elimination of the crank mechanism significantly reduces the number of moving parts and therefore the complexity of the engine[16]. This gives a number of advantages: reduced frictional losses due to the mechanical simplicity and the elimination of the piston side force in crankshaft engines; reduced heat transfer losses and NOx generation due to faster power stroke expansion; potentially lower maintenance cost and higher reliability due to a compact and simple design; and multi-fuel/combustion mode possibility due to combustion optimization flexibility that resulted from the variable compression ratio [17].
© 2018 Boru Jia. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.