+1 (929) 600-8049
Crimson Publishers Publish With Us Reprints e-Books Video articles

Full Text

Environmental Analysis & Ecology Studies

Review and Prospect of Combination of Various Technologies and Electrokinetic Remediation

Zhaobo W and Dajun R*

College of Resource and Environmental Engineering, China

*Corresponding author: Dajun R, College of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Submission: December 6, 2019Published: October 16, 2020

DOI: 10.31031/EAES.2020.07.000661

ISSN 2578-0336
Volume7 Issue3

Abstract

Soil electrokinetic remediation (EKR) is an attractive technology [1,2], due to the optimistic experimental results of extensive laboratory even pilot-scale [3]. This method is designed to remove contaminants from low permeability soils under the effect of applied current. However, this method possesses several drawbacks, for example, the EKR will cause soil acidification, but the EKR process requires an acidic condition during the application, which will promote the release of the heavy metal. Unfortunately, the condition of soil acidification is unacceptable. Furthermore, electrode configuration possesses inefficient electrical area, the EKR process is a very time-consuming application and high energy consumption etc. Obviously, the single EKR technology cannot achieve the best results, but combining electrokinetic with other remediation methods, promises to obtain more efficient removal of pollutant, less time and lower energy consumption. The authors objectively review the various technologies that can be combined with EKR based on these published studies in the last decade and aim to provide massive references to relative researchers.

Principles

Acar, Gale, et al. [4] described the principles of electrokinetic remediation, direct electric current was applied to electrodes immersed in water, results in oxidation at the anode and reduction at the cathode. This is the original EKR, also termed unenhanced electrokinetic remediation. Electric fields are applied to soil to migrate the charged ions via electrodes placed into the ground, negative ions move to anode, and positive ions (such as heavy metal ion) are attracted to cathode. It has been confirmed that the initiates movement of contaminants by electromigration, electro osmosis, electrolysis and diffusion [5], and non-ionic species are transported along with the electroosmotic flow [6]. The key electron transfer reactions that occur at electrodes during the EKR process is the electrolysis of water:

Application of Combined Technology

According to the experiments and pilot-scale studies conducted in the last 10 years, metals such as cadmium [7], chromium [8-19], copper [20-28], lead [29-35], manganese [36,37], mercury [38,39], nickel [40], uranium [41], and zinc [42], as well as dye [43,44], hydrocarbon[45-54], organochlorines [55-59], polychlorinated biphenyls [60,61], phenols [62,63], chlorophenols [64], are suitable for electrokinetic remediation and recovery. The author divides those technologies combined with EKR into physical technology, biotechnology and chemical technology, provides the application of these combination-technologies in soil remediation and evaluates these technologies. The most commonly used of these techniques are physical techniques, such as activated bamboo charcoal [65,66], electrode matrix-rotational operation mode [67], flushing [30,68-71], hexagonal two dimensional [72-74], ion exchange membranes [75], permeable reaction barrier (e.g. activated charcoal [28,76], Fe(0) [77,78]), pulsed variable electric field [26,79-81], sequential extraction analysis [82], ultrasonically [83], upward [84], washing [85] and several methods about electrode configuration [11,86, 87]. As for chemical technology, some enhancement methods such as acid enhanced [88], ammonia enhanced [21,66], iodide-enhanced [89] and enhanced solution (e.g. complexing agent [86], chelate agents [90-93], cosolvent [94], surfactants [51,52,95-97]) are also more commonly used, in addition, there are some other interesting methods such as chemical oxidation [98-101] and zero-valent iron [102]. There are few examples of biotechnology applications, but it is a very promising research direction, including bioleaching [103], bio stimulation [104,105], microbial pretreatment [106], phytoremediation [107], sulfur-oxidizing bacteria [108]. In addition, in order to solve the energy problem, microbial fuel cell [109] and solar cell [19,27,110-114] are also used in combination with EKR technology for soil remediation.

Opportunities and Prospect

EKR is very powerful for inducing controlled changes in soil, however, no single EKR technology that can achieve the best results but mixing electrokinetic with other technology promises to be the most effective method so far. Over the past decade, two potential applications caught our attention. The first is the hexagonal two-dimensional electrode, which can effectively minimize the inefficient electrical area. The second is the pulsed variable electric field, which can effectively minimize energy consumption. In addition, an interesting idea targets mobile contamination plumes by development of permeable reaction barrier (PRB). Throughout the past several decades, the development of EKR was rapidly, therefore, it is also important to review the studies and findings so as to estimate the prospect for future researches. Extensive literatures are reviewed and some of the thoughts on future development directions of EKR combination-technology are proposed in this invited paper. This paper aim to provide massive references to relative researchers, and hope to become a useful document recording.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No 41571306), Excellent Youth Foundation of Hubei Scientific Committee (Grant No 2018CFA067) and Foundation of Hubei Educational Committee Educational Commission of Hubei Province of China (Grant No D20181101).

References
  1. Alshawabkeh AN, YB Acar (1992) Removal of contaminants from soils by electrokinetics: A theoretical treatise. Journal of Environmental Science & Health 27(7): 1835-1861.
  2. Alshawabkeh AN, Acar YB (1993) Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environmental Science Technology 27(13): 2638-2647.
  3. Moghadam MJ, Moayedi H, Sadeghi MM, Hajiannia A (2016) A review of combinations of electrokinetic applications. Environ Geochem Health 38(6): 1217-1227.
  4. Acar YB, Gale RJ, Alshawabkeh AN, Marks RE, Puppala S, et al. (1995) Electrokinetic remediation: Basics and technology status. Journal of Hazardous Materials 40(2): 117-137.
  5. Moghadam MJ, Moayedi H, Sadeghi MM, Hajiannia A (2016) A review of combinations of electrokinetic applications. Environ Geochem Health 38(6): 1217-1227.
  6. Zelina J, Rusling J (1999) Electrochemical remediation of soils. Encyclopedia of Environmental Pollution Cleanup 11: 532-539.
  7. Yuan S, Zheng Z, Chen J, Lu X (2009) Use of solar cell in electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 162(2-3): 1583-1587.
  8. Zhang P, Jin C, Zhao Z, Tian G (2010) 2D crossed electric field for electrokinetic remediation of chromium contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 177(1-3): 1126-1133.
  9. Fonseca B, Pazos M, Tavares T, Sanroman MA (2012) Removal of hexavalent chromium of contaminated soil by coupling electrokinetic remediation and permeable reactive biobarriers. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 19(5): 1800-1808.
  10. Li D, Xiong Z, Nie Y, Niu YY, Wang L, et al. (2012) Near-anode focusing phenomenon caused by the high anolyte concentration in the electrokinetic remediation of chromium (VI)-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 229-230: 282-291.
  11. Li S, Li T, Li G, Li F, Guo S, et al. (2012) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of chromium-contaminated soil using approaching anodes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 6(6): 869-874.
  12. Li G, Guo S, Li S, Zhang L, Wang S, et al. (2012) Comparison of approaching and fixed anodes for avoiding the ‘focusing’ effect during electrokinetic remediation of chromium-contaminated soil. Chemical Engineering Journal 203: 231-238.
  13. Li D, Niu YY, Fan M, Xu DL, Xu P, et al. (2013) Focusing phenomenon caused by soil conductance heterogeneity in the electrokinetic remediation of chromium (VI)-contaminated soil. Separation and Purification Technology 120: 52-58.
  14. Suzuki T, Kawai K, Moribe M, Niinae M (2014) Recovery of Cr as Cr (III) from Cr (VI)-contaminated kaolinite clay by electrokinetics coupled with a permeable reactive barrier. J Hazard Mater 278: 297-303.
  15. Zhang S, Zhang J, Cheng X, Mei Y, Hu C, et al. (2015) Electrokinetic remediation of soil containing Cr (VI) by photovoltaic solar panels and a DC-DC converter. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 90(4): 693-700.
  16. Xu Y, Xu X, Hou H, Zhang J, Zhang D, et al. (2016) Moisture content-affected electrokinetic remediation of Cr (VI)-contaminated clay by a hydrocalumite barrier. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23(7): 6517-6523.
  17. Wei X, Guo S, Wu B, Li F, Li G, et al. (2015) Effects of reducing agent and approaching anodes on chromium removal in electrokinetic soil remediation. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 10(2): 253-261.
  18. Fu R, Wen D, Xia X, Zhang W, Gu Y, et al. (2017) Electrokinetic remediation of chromium (Cr)-contaminated soil with citric acid (CA) and polyaspartic acid (PASP) as electrolytes. Chemical Engineering Journal 316: 601-608.
  19. Zhou M, Xu J, Zhu S, Wang Y, Gao H (2018) Exchange electrode-electrokinetic remediation of Cr-contaminated soil using solar energy. Separation and Purification Technology 190: 297-306.
  20. Wang QY, Zhou DM, Cang L, Li LZ, Wang P, et al. (2009) Solid/solution Cu fractionations/speciation of a Cu contaminated soil after pilot-scale electrokinetic remediation and their relationships with soil microbial and enzyme activities. Environ Pollut 157(8-9): 2203-2208.
  21. Chen JL, Yang SF, Wu CC, Ton S (2011) Effect of ammonia as a complexing agent on electrokinetic remediation of copper-contaminated soil. Separation and Purification Technology 79(2): 157-163.
  22. Rojo A, HK Hansen, M Cubillos (2012) Electrokinetic remediation using pulsed sinusoidal electric field. Electrochimica Acta 86: 124-129.
  23. Hassan I, Mohamedelhassan E (2012) Electrokinetic Remediation with Solar Power for a Homogeneous Soft Clay Contaminated with Copper. International Journal of Environmental Pollution and Remediation 1: 67-74.
  24. Hansen HK, Rojo A, Ottosen LM (2012) Electrodialytic Remediation of Copper Mine Tailings. Procedia Engineering 44: 2053-2055.
  25. Cang L, Fan GP, Zhou DM, Wang QY (2013) Enhanced-electrokinetic remediation of copper-pyrene co-contaminated soil with different oxidants and pH control. Chemosphere 90(8): 2326-2331.
  26. Rojo A, HK Hansen, O Monárdez (2014) Electrokinetic remediation of mine tailings by applying a pulsed variable electric field. Minerals Engineering 55: 52-56.
  27. Hassan I, Mohamedelhassan E, Yanful EK (2015) Solar powered electrokinetic remediation of Cu polluted soil using a novel anode configuration. Electrochimica Acta 181: 58-67.
  28. Zhao S, Fan L, Zhou M, Zhu X, Li X, et al. (2016) Remediation of Copper Contaminated Kaolin by Electrokinetics Coupled with Permeable Reactive Barrier. Procedia Environmental Sciences 31: 274-279.
  29. Lee KY, Kim KW (2010) Heavy metal removal from shooting range soil by hybrid electrokinetics with bacteria and enhancing agents. Environ Sci Technol 44(24): 9482-9487.
  30. Reddy KR, Cameselle C, Ala P (2010) Integrated electrokinetic-soil flushing to remove mixed organic and metal contaminants. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 40(6): 1269-1279.
  31. Putra RS, Tanaka S (2011) Aluminum drinking water treatment residuals (Al-WTRs) as an entrapping zone for lead in soil by electrokinetic remediation. Separation and Purification Technology 79(2): 208-215.
  32. Li D, Tan XY, Wu XD, Pan C, Xu P, et al. (2014) Effects of electrolyte characteristics on soil conductivity and current in electrokinetic remediation of lead-contaminated soil. Separation and Purification Technology 135: 14-21.
  33. Cai ZP, van Doren J, Fang ZQ, Li WS (2015) Improvement in electrokinetic remediation of Pb-contaminated soil near lead acid battery factory. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 25(9): 3088-3095.
  34. Ait Ahmed O, Derriche Z, Kameche M, Bahmani A, Souli H, et al. (2016) Electro-remediation of lead contaminated kaolinite: An electro-kinetic treatment. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 100: 37-48.
  35. Zulfiqar W, Iqbal MA, Butt MK (2017) Pb(2+) ions mobility perturbation by iron particles during electrokinetic remediation of contaminated soil. Chemosphere 169: 257-261.
  36. Pazos M, Alcántara MT, Cameselle C, Sanromán MA (2009) Evaluation of electrokinetic technique for industrial waste decontamination. Separation Science and Technology 44(10): 2304-2321.
  37. Shu J, Liu R, Liu Z, Du J, Tao C, et al. (2015) Electrokinetic remediation of manganese and ammonia nitrogen from electrolytic manganese residue. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22(20): 16004-16013.
  38. García Rubio A, Rodríguez JM, Gómez Lahoz C, García Herruzo F, Vereda Alonso C, et al. (2011) Electrokinetic remediation: The use of mercury speciation for feasibility studies applied to a contaminated soil from Almadé Electrochimica Acta 56(25): 9303-9310.
  39. Rosestolato D, Bagatin R, Ferro S (2015) Electrokinetic remediation of soils polluted by heavy metals (mercury in particular). Chemical Engineering Journal 264: 16-23.
  40. Asadollahfardi G, Nasrollahi M, Rezaee M, Khodadadi Darban A (2017) Nickel removal from low permeable kaolin soil under unenhanced and EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic process. Advances in Environmental Research 6(2): 147-158.
  41. Kim GN, Shon DB, Park HM, Lee KW, Chung US, et al. (2011) Development of pilot-scale electrokinetic remediation technology for uranium removal. Separation and Purification Technology 80(1): 67-72.
  42. Ortiz SR, Leal D, Gutierrez C, Aracena A, Rojo A, et al. (2019) Electrokinetic remediation of manganese and zinc in copper mine tailings. Journal of Hazardous Materials 365: 905-911.
  43. Pazos M, Cameselle C, Sanromán MA (2008) Remediation of dye-polluted kaolinite by combination of electrokinetic remediation and electrochemical treatment. Environmental Engineering Science 25(3): 419-428.
  44. Yusni EM, Tanaka S (2015) Removal behaviour of a thiazine, an azo and a triarylmethane dyes from polluted kaolinitic soil using electrokinetic remediation technology. Electrochimica Acta 181: 130-138.
  45. Gonzini O, Plaza A, Di Palma L, Lobo MC (2010) Electrokinetic remediation of gasoil contaminated soil enhanced by rhamnolipid. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 40(6): 1239-1248.
  46. Pazos M, MT Alcantara, E Rosales, MA Sanroman (2011) Hybrid technologies for the remediation of diesel fuel polluted soil. Chemical Engineering & Technology 34(12): 2077-2082.
  47. Wan C, Du M, Lee DJ, Yang X, Ma W, et al. (2011) Electrokinetic remediation of β-cyclodextrin dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil using multiple electrodes. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 42(6): 972-975.
  48. Wan C, Du M, Lee DJ, Yang X, Ma W, et al. (2011) Electrokinetic remediation and microbial community shift of beta-cyclodextrin-dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89(6): 2019-2025.
  49. Mendez E, Perez M, Romero O, Beltran ED, Castro S, et al. (2012) Effects of electrode material on the efficiency of hydrocarbon removal by an electrokinetic remediation process. Electrochimica Acta 86: 148-156.
  50. Lopez VR, Alonso J, Canizares P, Leon MJ, Navarro V, et al. (2014) Removal of phenanthrene from synthetic kaolin soils by electrokinetic soil flushing. Separation and Purification Technology 132: 33-40.
  51. Boulakradeche MO, Akretche DE, Cameselle C, Hamidi N (2015) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of hydrophobic organics contaminated soils by the combination of non-ionic and ionic surfactants. Electrochimica Acta 174: 1057-1066.
  52. Ammami MT, Portet Koltalo F, Benamar A, Duclairoir Poc C, Wang H, et al. (2015) Application of biosurfactants and periodic voltage gradient for enhanced electrokinetic remediation of metals and PAHs in dredged marine sediments. Chemosphere 125: 1-8.
  53. Mena E, Villasenor J, Rodrigo MA, Canizares P (2016) Electrokinetic remediation of soil polluted with insoluble organics using biological permeable reactive barriers: Effect of periodic polarity reversal and voltage gradient. Chemical Engineering Journal 299: 30-36.
  54. Sandu C, Popescu M, Rosales E, Bocos E, Pazos M, et al. (2016) Electrokinetic-Fenton technology for the remediation of hydrocarbons historically polluted sites. Chemosphere 156: 347-356.
  55. Li Z, Yuan S, Wan J, Long H, Tong M, et al. (2011) A combination of electrokinetics and Pd/Fe PRB for the remediation of pentachlorophenol-contaminated soil. J Contam Hydrol 124(1-4): 99-107.
  56. Reddy KR, Darko K, Al-Hamdan AZ (2011) Electrokinetic remediation of pentachlorophenol contaminated clay soil. Water Air and Soil Pollution 221(1-4): 35-44.
  57. Fan GP, Cang L, Fang GD, Zhou DM (2014) Surfactant and oxidant enhanced electrokinetic remediation of a PCBs polluted soil. Separation and Purification Technology 123: 106-113.
  58. Gholami M, Kebria DY, Mahmudi M (2014) Electrokinetic remediation of perchloroethylene-contaminated soil. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 11(5): 1433-1438.
  59. Fan G, Wang Y, Fang G, Zhu X, Zhou D, et al. (2016) Review of chemical and electrokinetic remediation of PCBs contaminated soils and sediments. Environ Sci Process Impacts 18(9): 1140-1156.
  60. Fan G, Wang Y, Fang G, Zhu X, Zhou D, et al. (2016) Review of chemical and electrokinetic remediation of PCBs contaminated soils and sediments. Environ Sci Process Impacts 18(9): 1140-1156.
  61. Chen T, Sun C, Chen W (2016) Application of electrokinetics in the remediation of polychlorinated biphenyl-contaminated soil by a combination of soil washing and biodegradation. Application of Materials Science and Environmental Materials (AMSEM2015) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference.
  62. Choi C, Hong B, Choi HY, Lee E, Choi SS, et al. (2016) Treatment of heavy metals and phenol in contaminated soil using direct current and pulse voltage. Applied Chemistry for Engineering 27(6): 606-611.
  63. Pujol AA, León I, Cárdenas J, Sepúlveda Guzmán S, Manríquez J, et al. (2019) Electrochemical degradation of phenol and clorophenol using boron doped diamond and composite of Fe3O4 nanoparticles+chitosan. The Electrochemical Society.
  64. Sun Y, Gao K, Zhang Y, Zou H (2017) Remediation of persistent organic pollutant-contaminated soil using biosurfactant-enhanced electrokinetics coupled with a zero-valent iron/activated carbon permeable reactive barrier. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24(36): 28142-28151.
  65. Ma JW, Wang FY, Huang ZH, Wang H (2010) Simultaneous removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol and Cd from soils by electrokinetic remediation combined with activated bamboo charcoal. J Hazard Mater 176(1-3): 715-720.
  66. Zhu S, Han D, Zhou M, Liu Y (2016) Ammonia enhanced electrokinetics coupled with bamboo charcoal adsorption for remediation of fluorine-contaminated kaolin clay. Electrochimica Acta 198: 241-248.
  67. Luo Q, Wang H, Zhang X, Fan X, Qian Y, et al. (2006) In situ bioelectrokinetic remediation of phenol-contaminated soil by use of an electrode matrix and a rotational operation mode. Chemosphere 64(3): 415-422.
  68. Kim GN, Yang BI, Moon JK, Lee KW (2009) Vertical electrokinetic-flushing remediation. Separation Science and Technology 44(10): 2354-2370.
  69. López Vizcaíno R, Alonso J, Canizares P, León M, Navarro V, et al. (2014) Removal of phenanthrene from synthetic kaolin soils by electrokinetic soil flushing. Separation and Purification Technology 132: 33-40.
  70. Ng YS, Gupta BS, Hashim MA (2014) Performance evaluation of two-stage electrokinetic washing as soil remediation method for lead removal using different wash solutions. Electrochimica Acta 147: 9-18.
  71. dos Santos EV, Souza F, Saez C, Cañizares P, Lanza MRDV, et al. (2016) Application of electrokinetic soil flushing to four herbicides: A comparison. Chemosphere 153: 205-211.
  72. Lee KY, Kim HA, Lee WC, Kim SO, JU Lee, et al. (2012) Ex-situ field application of electrokinetics for remediation of shooting-range soil. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 34(1): 151-159.
  73. Kim DH, Jo SU, Choi JH, Yang JS, Baek K, et al. (2012) Hexagonal two-dimensional electrokinetic systems for restoration of saline agricultural lands: a pilot study. Chemical Engineering Journal 198: 110-121.
  74. Jeon EK, Jung JM, Kim WS, Ko SH, Baek K, et al. (2015) In situ electrokinetic remediation of As-, Cu-, and Pb- contaminated paddy soil using hexagonal electrode configuration: A full-scale study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22(1): 711-720.
  75. Chen X, Shen Z, Lei Y, Ju B, Wang W, et al. (2006) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of Cd and Pb spiked soil coupled with cation exchange membrane. Soil Research 44(5): 523-529.
  76. Huang T, Li D, Kexiang L, Zhang Y (2015) Heavy metal removal from MSWI fly ash by electrokinetic remediation coupled with a permeable activated charcoal reactive barrier. Scientific Reports 5: 15412.
  77. Suzuki T, Oyama Y, Moribe M, Niinae M (2012) An electrokinetic/Fe0 permeable reactive barrier system for the treatment of nitrate-contaminated subsurface soils. Water Research 46(3): 772-778.
  78. Kebria DY, Taghizadeh M, Camacho JV, Latifi N (2016) Remediation of PCE contaminated clay soil by coupling electrokinetics with zero-valent iron permeable reactive barrier. Environmental Earth Sciences 75(8): 699.
  79. Ryu B, Park S, Baek K, Yang J (2009) Pulsed electrokinetic decontamination of agricultural lands around abandoned mines contaminated with heavy metals. Separation Science and Technology 44(10): 2421-2436.
  80. Lee Y, Choi J, Lee H, Ha T (2013) Electrokinetic remediation of saline soil using pulse power. Environmental Engineering Science 30(3): 133-141.
  81. Zhou M, Zhu S, Liu F, Zhou D (2014) Pulse-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of fluorine-contaminated soil. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 31(11): 2008-2013.
  82. Giannis A, Pentari D, Wang J, Gidarakos E (2010) Application of sequential extraction analysis to electrokinetic remediation of cadmium, nickel and zinc from contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials 184(1-3): 547-554.
  83. Huang T, Zhou L, Liu L, Xia M (2018) Ultrasound-enhanced electrokinetic remediation for removal of Zn, Pb, Cu and Cd in municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes. Waste Management 75: 226-235.
  84. Wang J, Huang X, Kao J, Stabnikova O (2007) Simultaneous removal of organic contaminants and heavy metals from kaolin using an upward electrokinetic soil remediation process. Journal of Hazardous Materials 144(1-2): 292-299.
  85. Mao X, Han F, Shao X, Arslan Z, McComb J, et al. (2016) Remediation of lead-, arsenic-, and cesium- contaminated soil using consecutive washing enhanced with electro-kinetic field. Journal of Soils and Sediments 16(10): 2344-2353.
  86. Zhang T, Zou H, Ji M, Li X, Li L, et al. (2014) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of lead-contaminated soil by complexing agents and approaching anodes. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21(4): 3126-3133.
  87. Wei X, Guo S, Wu B, Li F, Li G (2016) Effects of reducing agent and approaching anodes on chromium removal in electrokinetic soil remediation. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 10(2): 253-261.
  88. Villen Guzman M, Paz Garcia J, Rodriguez Maroto J, Gomez Lahoz C, Garcia Herruzo F (2014) Acid enhanced electrokinetic remediation of a contaminated soil using constant current density: strong vs. weak acid. Separation Science and Technology 49(10): 1461-1468.
  89. Reddy K, Chaparro C, Saichek R (2003) Iodide-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of mercury-contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Engineering 129(12): 1137-1148.
  90. Giannis A, Nikolaou A, Pentari D, Gidarakos E (2009) Chelating agent-assisted electrokinetic removal of cadmium, lead and copper from contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 157(12): 3379-3386.
  91. Suzuki T, Niinae M, Koga T, Akita T, Ohta M, et al. (2014) EDDS-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal-contaminated clay soils under neutral pH conditions. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 440: 145-150.
  92. Masi M, R Iannelli R, G Losito G (2016) Ligand-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of metal-contaminated marine sediments with high acid buffering capacity. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23(11): 10566-10576.
  93. Song Y, Ammami M, Benamar A, Mezazigh S, Wang H (2016) Effect of EDTA, EDDS, NTA and citric acid on electrokinetic remediation of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn contaminated dredged marine sediment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23(11): 10577-10586.
  94. Maturi K, Reddy K (2008) Cosolvent-enhanced desorption and transport of heavy metals and organic contaminants in soils during electrokinetic remediation. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 189(1-4): 199-211.
  95. Maturi K, Reddy K, Cameselle C (2009) Surfactant-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of mixed contamination in low permeability soil. Separation Science and Technology 44(10): 2385-2409.
  96. Gonzini O, Plaza A, Palma L, Lobo M (2010) Electrokinetic remediation of gasoil contaminated soil enhanced by rhamnolipid. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 40(6): 1239-1248.
  97. Fan G, Cang L, Fang G, Zhou D (2014) Surfactant and oxidant enhanced electrokinetic remediation of a PCBs polluted soil. Separation and Purification Technology 123: 106-113.
  98. Pazos M, M Alcántara, E Rosales, M Sanromán (2011) Hybrid technologies for the remediation of diesel fuel polluted soil. Chemical Engineering & Technology 34(12): 2077-2082.
  99. Cang L, Fan G, Zhou D, Wang Q (2013) Enhanced-electrokinetic remediation of copper–pyrene co-contaminated soil with different oxidants and pH control. Chemosphere 90(8): 2326-2331.
  100. Bocos E, Fernández C, Pazos M, Sanromán M (2015) Removal of PAHs and pesticides from polluted soils by enhanced electrokinetic-Fenton treatment. Chemosphere 125: 168-174.
  101. Sandu C, Popescu M, Rosales E, Bocos E, Pazos M, et al. (2016) Electrokinetic-Fenton technology for the remediation of hydrocarbons historically polluted sites. Chemosphere 156: 347-356.
  102. Weng C, Lin Y, Lin T, Kao C (2007) Enhancement of electrokinetic remediation of hyper-Cr (VI) contaminated clay by zero-valent iron. Journal of Hazardous Materials 149(2): 292-302.
  103. Peng G, Tian G, Liu J, Bao Q, Zang L (2011) Removal of heavy metals from sewage sludge with a combination of bioleaching and electrokinetic remediation technology. Desalination 271(1-3): 100-104.
  104. Dong Z, Huang W, Xing D, Zhang H (2013) Remediation of soil co-contaminated with petroleum and heavy metals by the integration of electrokinetics and biostimulation. J Hazard Mater 260: 399-408.
  105. Ma Y, Li X, Mao H, Wang B, Wang P (2018) Remediation of hydrocarbon-heavy metal co-contaminated soil by electrokinetics combined with biostimulation. Chemical Engineering Journal 353: 410-418.
  106. Huang T, Peng Q, Yu L, Li D (2017) The detoxification of heavy metals in the phosphate tailing-contaminated soil through sequential microbial pretreatment and electrokinetic remediation. Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal 26(3): 308-322.
  107. Chirakkara R, Reddy K, Cameselle C (2015) Electrokinetic amendment in phytoremediation of mixed contaminated soil. Electrochimica Acta 181: 179-191.
  108. Maini G, Sharman A, Sunderland G, Knowles C, Jackman S (2000) An integrated method incorporating sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and electrokinetics to enhance removal of copper from contaminated soil. Environmental Science & Technology 34(6): 1081-1087.
  109. Habibul N, Hu Y, Sheng G (2016) Microbial fuel cell driving electrokinetic remediation of toxic metal contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials 318: 9-14.
  110. Yuan S, Zheng Z, Chen J, Lu X (2009) Use of solar cell in electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 162(2-3): 1583-1587.
  111. Hassan I, Mohamedelhassan E (2012) Electrokinetic remediation with solar power for a homogeneous soft clay contaminated with copper. International Journal of Environmental Pollution and Remediation (IJEPR) 1(1): 67-74.
  112. Zhang S, Zhang J, Cheng X, Mei Y, Hu C, et al., (2015) Electrokinetic remediation of soil containing Cr (VI) by photovoltaic solar panels and a DC‐DC converter. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 90(4): 693-700.
  113. Jeon E, Ryu S, Baek K (2015) Application of solar-cells in the electrokinetic remediation of as-contaminated soil. Electrochimica Acta 181: 160-166.
  114. Souza F, Saéz C, Llanos J, Lanza M, Cañizares P, et al., (2016) Solar-powered electrokinetic remediation for the treatment of soil polluted with the herbicide 2, 4-D. Electrochimica Acta 190: 371-377.

© 2020 Dajun R. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.

Submit Query

PubMed Indexed Articles

Track Your Article

Editor In Chief

Hirotada TSUJII

Ph.D in Agriculture from Faculty of Agriculture, Tohoku University

Approaches in Poultry, Dairy & Veterinary Sciences

Maria Kuman

Research Professor, PhD, Holistic Research Institute

Advances in Complementary & Alternative Medicine

Tomasz Karski

MD PhD, Professor, Vincent Pol University

Orthopedic Research Online Journal

Jiexiong Feng

Professor, Chief Doctor, Director of Department of Pediatric Surgery, Associate Director of Department of Surgery, Doctoral Supervisor Tongji hospital, Tongji medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Research in Pediatrics & Neonatology

Muhammad Atiqullah

Senior Research Engineer and Professor, Center for Refining and Petrochemicals, Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

Research & Development in Material Science

Ian James Martins

Fellow of International Agency for Standards and Ratings (IASR), Edith Cowan University, Sarich Neuroscience Research Institute

Advancements in Case Studies

Thomas F George

Chancellor Emeritus / Professor Emeritus of Chemistry and Physics, University of Missouri–St. Louis

Annals of Chemical Science Research

Jose Crisologo de Sales Silva

Ph.D in Science from the Federal University of Alagoas, UFAL, Brazil

Novel Research in Sciences

Naglaa Sami Adbel Aziz Mahmoud

Assistant Professor in College of Architecture, Art and Design

Academic Journal of Engineering Studies

Tong-Ching Tom Wu

Interim Dean, College of Education and Health Sciences, Director of Biomechanics Laboratory, Sport Science Innovation Program, Bridgewater State University

Research & Investigations in Sports Medicine

Dr. Jose Luis Turabian

Professor of numerous training courses in Family Medicine

Associative Journal of Health Sciences

Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak

Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics and Computer Science

COJ Electronics & Communications

Önder Pekcan

Emeritus Professor of Physics, Kadir Has University, Turkey

Polymer Science: Peer Review Journal

Member In

OPEN ACADEMIC JOURNALS INDEX
Advance Sciences Journal Index
Journal Factor
Journal Factor
citefactor
road-issn
wsu
semantic-scholar
Search It
raven
rzblx1
wcosj
ICI World of Journals
scilit
publons
Academic Resource Index
Academic Resource Index
Academic Resource Index
google scholar
plagscan
View All...

Quick Links

  • Editorial Board Registrations
  • Submit your Article
  • Best Paper of the Volume
  • Reprints
  • Refer a Friend
  • Advertise With Us

Our Recent Edition

Top Editors

Financial Support

Sponsors

Latest e-Books

Latest Video

© 2017 Crimson Publishers, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use. Creative Commons License Open Access by Crimson Publishers is licensed under Creative Commons License
a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.crimsonpublishers.com. Best viewed in browser_icons browser_icons| Above IE 9.0 version

Reprints