Saima Habeeb*
Rufaida college of Nursing, Jamia Hamdard University, India
*Corresponding author: Saima Habeeb, Nursing Scholar, Rufaida College of Nursing, Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi, India
Submission: May 3, 2020Published: March 30, 2021
ISSN: 2577-2007Volume7 Issue2
There is no health without mental health. This simple yet profound statement is at the heart of transformation not only of the mental health system in the United States but of health care itself [1].
The public health model is characterized by a focus on the health of the entire population, the inclusion of preventative care, and the promotion of social supports. According to the Surgeon General’s report on Mental Health (1999) [2,3]:
“The public health model is characterized by concern for the health of a population in its entirety and by awareness of the linkage between health and the physical and psycho- social environment. Public health focuses not only on traditional areas of diagnosis, treatment, and etiology, but also on epidemiologic surveillance of the health of the population at large, health promotion, disease prevention, and access to and evaluation of services (Last & Wallace, 1992)….”
Implicit in this definition is the concept of enhancing the quality of life of individuals and the public at large. The mission of public health, as defined by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), is to assure “the conditions for people to be healthy,” as pursued by governmental agencies, public and private health care organizations, academic institutions, and community-based organizations [4-8].
The American Public Health Association (APHA) has developed 10 performance standards for states to be judged on their public health approach.
A. Inform, educate, and empower people about health issues.
B. Link people to needed personal health services and assure the provision of health care when otherwise unavailable.
C. Assure a competent public health and personal healthcare workforce.
D. Enforce laws and regulations that protect health and ensure safety.
E. Develop policies and plans that support individual and community health efforts.
F. Diagnose and investigate health problems and health hazards in the community.
G. Mobilize community partnerships to identify and solve health problems.
H. Monitor health status to identify community health problems.
I. Evaluate effectiveness, accessibility, and quality of personal and population-based health services.
J. Research for new insights and innovative solutions to health problems.
Haggerty, 1994 defined five levels of public mental health. Traditional psychiatric systems usually have two levels: inpatient and outpatient. If an individual is not a “patient,” then there is no place for him/her in the system. The public health model adds three levels: universal preventative, selective preventative, and indicated preventative.
Universal preventive interventions are delivered to an entire population. For example, an anti-stigma campaign (eg., consumer/family discussions with religious institutions) would reduce institutional fear and discrimination, and the resultant loss of social status often experienced by people with mental illness. Another example:
Department of Mental Health (DMH) could effectively publicize
community services that offer treatment, support, or advocacy,
such as support groups, legal aid, and local counselors (eg., social
workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists).
Selective interventions are offered to those adults/children
who are at a high risk of developing mental health problems due to
group characteristics. An example is DMH’s setting up mental health
assistance centers in places where homeless people congregate. Jail
diversion programs, such as the Framingham model, offer mental
health assistance to people with mental illness who are at risk for
jail.
Indicated interventions are offered to adults/children who
have an individual risk of developing a disorder and are manifesting
symptoms at low but noticeable levels. Respite is an excellent
example of this. For many consumers, it’s a caring place to spend
a few nights with peers, and with access to a psychiatrist as they
need one, but without being locked up in an expensive hospital unit.
For parents of youth with a serious emotional disorder, it’s having
as little as a few hours without their children in order to regroup.
Another example is assisting a consumer with difficult vocational
or housing situations (eg, reasonable accommodation requests).
Health promotion, Disease Prevention Psychiatry has often
focused on the treatment of mental illness symptoms, often to
the exclusion of the patient’s physical health status. For example,
psychiatrists may prescribe medications that alleviate psychiatric
symptoms, but contribute to short-term physical distress and/or
long term chronic physical illness.
Mental illness contributes a substantial burden of disease
worldwide. Globally, approximately 450 million persons suffer
from mental disorders, and one fourth of the world’s population
will develop a mental or behavioral disorder at some point during
their lives
Mental health is integral to overall health and well-being and
should be treated with the same urgency as physical health. Mental
illness can influence the onset, progression, and outcome of other
illnesses and often correlates with health risk behaviors such as
substance abuse, tobacco use, and physical inactivity.
Depression has emerged as a risk factor for such chronic
illnesses as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes and
can adversely affect the course and management of these conditions.
Treatment for mental disorders is available and effective, However,
the majority of persons with diagnosed mental disorders do not
receive treatment. The challenges for public health are to identify
risk factors, increase awareness about mental disorders and the
effectiveness of treatment, remove the stigma associated with
receiving treatment, eliminate health disparities, and improve
access to mental health services for all persons, particularly among
populations that are disproportionately affected.
Public health agencies can incorporate mental health promotion
into chronic disease prevention efforts, conduct surveillance and
research to improve the evidence base about mental health.
The philosophy behind the public health model of community
organizing is that the primary obstacles to engagement are
ideological, and that the primary task in overcoming these obstacles
is a communicative one. Civil society leaders, as such, are burdened
with the responsibility to plan and prepare for the eventuality of
attack, consciously preparing themselves, their followers, and their
allies to both endure and oppose the use of fear, hate, and revenge.
Isolation of these social pathogens, inoculation of vulnerable
populations, and education of those looking for certainty, comprise
key elements of the public health model. A more complete definition
of this model of social organization follows.
The public health model of community organizing assumes a
constant, aggressive opposition committed to undermining and
silencing good faith participation in societal problem-solving. As
such, activists who approach organizing by bolstering community
safeguards and regulating mechanisms have a powerful asset in
moral sanction. As guardians of a fair and open process, they can
claim the high ground over anti-democratic opponents, whose
behavior, if not agenda, violates societal norms. In this way, prodemocracy
activists and organizers can increase the likelihood of
broad-based conscientious involvement in public policy decisionmaking.
Moral sanction alone (especially in the present where
citizenship is so rare), may be insufficient to constrain political
violence or official repression, but it can bring significant pressures
to bear on public behavior as well as within institutions under
the control or influence of civil society. Indeed, reform and
revolutionary movements, as well as other forms of resistance in
fundamental conflict with despotic powers, rely on moral sanction
as an essential component of political warfare.
In fact, the commitment of social movement participants and
the approbation of non- combatants and potential recruits are
largely determined by the ability of resistance leaders to articulate
and disseminate the moral values at issue. In this way, resistors and
allied advocates can gain not only attention, but also recognition of
the validity of their grievances. At the same time, the moral prestige
of oppressive institutions is diminished, and opportunities to
obtain concessions or to leverage discussion are enhanced.
Communication of core values leads to the empowering acts of
individuals that develop commitment to a process of transformation
they believe will lead to greater fulfillment of these values. Faith
in the possibility of justice, by a process that transcends issues,
acknowledges the supremacy of human dignity and the ethical
imperative to act.
The strength of the public health model, when applied to
community organizing, is in its view of the body politic as an
organic, dynamic system of adjustment and evolution that, like
the human body, requires maintenance, nurturing, and protection
from external threat. The central perspective of this model is a faith in humanity to resolve conflict given the opportunity to work.
Cycles of subversion and integration, when functioning organically,
strengthen a society’s immune system allowing it to adapt to new
circumstances with greater resilience.
The weakness of the public health model lies in the vulnerability
of its practitioners to accusations of conspiracies, and the tendency
of overzealous devotees to neglect the holistic requirement of
integrating their practice with those engaged in reform advocacy,
political diplomacy, law enforcement, and military deterrence.
Actors accustomed to functioning as the white blood cells of society,
by definition, are programmed to be on the lookout for social
viruses. The difficulties of integration with sympathetic actors not
so inclined, arises when these threats successfully elude popular
detection and are able to spread covertly, infecting unsuspecting
target populations -- including one’s allies -- through lazy and
corrupt media habits.
Research
As noted, the successful application of the public health model
to ideological disease control depends on the early detection and
analysis of organized anti-democratic aggression, systematic study
of and intervention with vulnerable populations, and educational
campaigns aimed at broadening public support for the investments
required. We will now examine the essential integrative techniques
used to construct the working relationships needed for building a
community of sociopolitical health practitioners.
The first thing to recognize in this endeavor is that this is
sensitive, potentially dangerous work that should not be undertaken
haphazardly, or alone. The creation of enduring institutionalized
programs critical to its effectiveness does not come about by
bureaucratic means - they are created from the ground up, and rely
on the participation of local moral authorities.
Consequently, concerned citizens as well as community
organizers interested in personal security, movement continuity,
and a politically healthy community, must establish and operate
within a network that involves intentional collaboration between
churches, schools, human rights groups, neighborhood associations,
labor and civic organizations, and individuals who perform research
and investigative functions. The face-to-face networking that takes
place in communicating the need for and agenda of such a network
is the adhesive of community-building.
Lengthy discussions, socials, and workshops organized around
timely, accurate, and relevant information that makes a community
threat visible and understandable, generates concern and allows
a nascent network to determine its educational and organizing
needs. Local research, linked with regional and national resources,
provides historical background and political context, as well as
presents options and locates targets for community action. Network
solidarity, cemented by well-articulated ideas and based on the
experience of other communities, then becomes the foundation for
engaging in personal reflection and community education.
Once a network has determined its educational needs, it can
pool connections and resources to provide opportunities both
separately and jointly for their organizational members, depending
on the focus and comfort level that exists. Initially, the delivery style,
references, and language used may differ significantly - eventually a
mutually recognized set of values and purpose will develop.
Individuals and groups within the network will progress at their
own pace in absorbing and adapting to altered perceptions of society
and conflict. Network leaders who monitor and communicate this
progress can best determine when and how their group is ready
to act. Cross-pollenization between groups both accelerates the
progress and breaks down barriers or misperceptions between
groups that previously received only mediated impressions of their
new allies. Public events that promote core values already shared
by the network nodes serve as recruitment tools that can funnel the
unaware into educational functions where deeper discussions that
lead to conversion take place.
The private and popular education functions undertaken by the
network thus become central organizing tools based on ongoing
research and analysis in which all movement participants play a
role through observation and dialogue. The formality or informality
of the network is less important than its functionality - active
communication will lead to some kind of community action.
Community action, whether a containment, prophylactic or
remedial intervention, involves high profile events and public
dramas that also serve as educational and recruitment venues. As
such, they should be approached and designed with the assistance
of people who have connections and experience in public relations,
theater, media, and education. Plans, materials and scripts for
associated press conferences, speaking engagements, and literature
dissemination should be strategically developed. Timing and
sequence of delivery, when rationally executed, helps to minimize
confusion as well as disarm opposition.
Sticking to the network-adopted mission and objectives
reduces the likelihood that wedges can be driven between
network participants. Pre-selected, well-recognized spokespersons
trained and prepared to deliver the message with confidence and
conviction helps to avoid losing the initiative by lapsing into a
defensive posture.
The first public impression of the meaning and importance of
the action can not only be manufactured - it can help determine
the course of the ensuing conflict and community discussion. Selfrestraint,
a sense of humor, and controlled righteous indignation
- being firm on principle, but fair in application -- are powerful
attributes when delivered by or with the consent of visible moral
authorities. Subsequent cycles of analysis, action, and reflection
can then reinforce individual group actions initiated within the
new political context, with the initial joint action and theme serving
as the touchstone. Continuous network communication allows for spotting and assessing opportunities for advancing its agenda,
extending its influence, and consolidating its power.
By focusing on policy to the exclusion of process, advocacy
groups, perceived as guardians of democracy, fail in this task
because they are not engaged in opposition activity. They are
engaged in political diplomacy. Hence, much of the training work
needed is of individuals already persuaded of the importance
of opposition research. Acting from the public health model -
which is to look at the causative mechanism, how the behavior is
transmitted, and what sort of interventions can either prevent or
modify it - enables these individuals to respond to the pathology of
violence and intimidation that prevents community participation
and conflict resolution.
Institutional change, currently based on the four inapplicable
models, is a long way off. Government and philanthropic funding
is almost exclusively restricted to the four ineffective models.
Training around pressure group tactics used to get laws passed
that will not be enforced might be considered a waste of time. Even
human rights groups that do good training and education devoted
to tolerance often view their work in building contacts with law
enforcement as educational, when, in fact, they are often being used
as an intelligence source - for political intelligence.
Looking at societies, cultures, and individuals as evolving,
conscious organisms that possess organic “natures” and acquired
characteristics, that are both responsive to conscience and
vulnerable to manipulation, encourages research, analysis, and
discussion of how social change happens. Scrutiny of movements,
actions, and fundamental conflicts in multiple eras, societies,
and venues provides a context for engagement that enables both
holistic thinking and critical examination of often unquestioned
perspectives and personal positions. Distinction of authentic
grassroots activism from more socially acceptable elite-sponsored
activities serves to both inspire and shield the kind-hearted who
choose to engage in public affairs (Table 1).
Table 1:Core functions of the Center for Mental Health Services and associated steps.
© 2021 Saima Habeeb. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.