Crimson Publishers Publish With Us Reprints e-Books Video articles

Full Text

Cohesive Journal of Microbiology & Infectious Disease

A Microbial Menace: Emerging Infections in the 21st Century

Kazi Nahid Hasan and Anjani Kumar Upadhyay*

School of Biotechnology, India

*Corresponding author: Anjani Kumar Upadhyay, School of Biotechnology, India

Submission: September 01, 2020; Published: September 10, 2020

DOI: 10.31031/CJMI.2020.03.000583

ISSN 2583-0190
Volume4 issues2


Microorganisms causing lethal diseases to have sabotaged human prosperity and well-being for many centuries. They live in each possible ecological niche on the earth and have colonized the world for quite a while. There is a larger part of microbial networks which are fundamental to human or other living creatures. But occasionally, numerous microorganisms are spotted as a pathogen as they can cause an intense irresistible sickness, they may enact the pathway that prompts ceaseless maladies, and subsequently, they become the greatest danger to humankind. Irresistible infections are straight on battle between the microbial world and the universe of human physiology. In the last 100 years, this microbial and human universe was massively changed in an unrivaled way by mighty and invincible development of mankind, with its overall effect on the earth by climatic changes, chemical concoctions, physical interactions, and cultural incitements. Also, on account of these, dangers related to microorganisms will suffice emerging, reemerging, and persevering. Some may cause recently perceived maladies; others might be once examined pathogens that are causing new and bigger populaces. Infectious agents which are also a living organism undergo genetic change and evolution. This caliber of microbes reveals their potential ability and possible capacity to infect new hosts, by modifications in their susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs, and furthermore rolling out extreme improvements in their gathering to have insusceptibility also making drastic changes in their reception to host immunity. Human conduct, both individual or collective too can be the complex factor in disease emergence. Currently, we are additionally confronting the dangers of purposely presented natural specialists. Infectious diseases will proceed as the significant reason for universal fatality [World Health Organization, 1992] and will never be repressed during our lifetimes. However, with the progress of scientific knowledge, completely arranged treatment procedures, better than average assets, and political confirmation, most of the ailments may be prevented. A portion of the significant methodologies could be immunization, utilization of medications, or vector control strategies. The 21st century has seen various cutting-edge innovations and pattern setting developments that improved life and wellbeing and regularly changed the business. Numerous new organically dynamic nano structures are being created, present day vaccinology has additionally gained tremendous ground lately utilizing current advances, combinatorial science has likewise developed as an effective instrument in the screening for new enemy of infections, microbial quality articulation profiling has quickly started to lead the pack in this field and is overriding basic genome sequencing.

Keywords: Microbes; Infectious disease; Immunity; Immunization; Emergence


Human beings certainly do not enter in a land where an outbreak of a disease already has occurred; but to our dismay, disease emerges out everywhere, quite ubiquitously. Though a plethora of infectious disease pandemics and epidemics took place in the saga of human evolution; in gross, emerging infections have shown up among people recently or the diseases that are spreading at a high rate among people regarding incidence or topographical dissemination [1]. Albeit it is familiar as a millennium issue, scientific communities have shown their keen interest into this arena thus the repertoire of emerging and reemerging microbial diseases are currently reckoned as major microbiological threats for public wellness [2]. Globally a huge segment of the entire population is struggling a lot against microbial [bacterial, viral and fungal] invaders in this century than the previous one. Although few snares were implemented in order to reduce risks like poor sanitation and hygiene, method of quarantine, etc. and so forth it is also very essential to prevent the introduction of infectious agents with vigorous efforts. Rising infectious diseases represent a noteworthy danger to global health security. Previous encounters indicated that the flare-up could not just possibly increase the enormous death rate as they propagate, yet in addition have tremendous socio-economic effect in the present interconnected world. Tragically, a significant number of these maladies don't yet have any cure, and healthcare providers are likewise frequently survivors of such ailments [3]. Literature reveals that almost 60% of all human contagious ailments perceived up until now, and roughly 75% of the EIDs that have influenced mankind in the course of the past three decades were of zoonotic origin [4]. Irresistible infections remain the subsequent driving reason for death worldwide regardless of the ongoing fast turns of events and headways in present day medication, science and biotechnology.  More than 25% of the annual deaths across the globe is recorded due to such emerging diseases [5,6]. Between more than 50 emerging contagions, around 10% microbial agents have been identified during the most recent 40 years [7,8]. Aggravating the current trouble, the world has encountered an expanded occurrence and trans-boundary spread of developing irresistible ailment because of population growth, urbanization and globalization in the course of recent decades [9,10]. At the beginning of the 21st century, the eventual fate of irresistible maladies and its effect on societies all through the world is strikingly evident.

There was a statement composed by an incredible microbiologist in the early 90s, Hans Zinsser in his book 'Rats, Lice and History', through which he needed to mirror the significance of creating implies for forestalling infectious diseases, “Infectious disease is one of the few genuine adventures left in the world. The dragons are all dead and the lance grows rusty in the chimney corner. About the only sporting proposition that remains unimpaired by the relentless domestication of a once free-living human species is the war against those ferocious little fellow creatures, which lurk in dark corners and stalk us in the bodies of rats, mice and all kinds of domestic animals; which fly and crawl with the insects, and waylay us in our food and drink and even in our love" [11]. This review will significantly underscore the threat of microbes to mankind, important factors linked to the emergence of infectious diseases, and new opportunities to combat them through the novel and creative solutions.

Evolution Across Time

Since millennium, individuals and their progenitors experienced illnesses - each the assortment incited with the guide of infectious pathogens for examples viruses, bacteria, parasites and due to their superannuation, the structure hastened through our own bodies to degenerate [12]. Microbes keep on messing up people with the rise of new pathogens and the ceaseless advancement of known pathogens. Roughly 160 recently emerging infectious diseases brought about by microbes have been found in the previous 70 years [13]. Globally, the commonness of bacterial ailments and the multifaceted nature of their ways of life, it is obligatory that a more extensive comprehension of their advancement is created. This incorporates understanding microbial biology, for example, the niches inhabited by pathogens and the methods of their transmission [14]. Moreover, it is critical to comprehend the components i.e., fundamental hereditary, decent variety and usefulness to acknowledge how microbes can advance and to recognize likely focuses for mediation and malady control. With this information, analysts can endeavor to anticipate where illness flare-ups are probably going to happen [15]. Methodologies can likewise be created as a measure of epidemiological awareness, for instance, by advancing a way of life that keeps up populaces of beneficent microorganisms in our bodies and obstructs the advancement or entrance of pathogens [14]. An eminent historian George Santayana in The Life of Reason brought up that, “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”. The previous century was a microcosm of the historical backdrop of irresistible maladies. In the recent years, immense enhancements in wellbeing and in the avoidance and control of irresistible illnesses have been seen in the advanced world at the specific rates that overshadowed earlier hundreds of years.  Nevertheless, a great part of the enhancement was constrained; both the developed and developing world faced significant medical issues in the development of new and once-controlled contamination. Cultural and mechanical change represented both the control and the development of infectious diseases. Almost certainly, such change will proceed into the twenty-first century and that the pace of progress may quicken [16]. An important information gained from history is that change prompts the rise of infectious diseases, and we should be set up to sermonize about it. We can never be too self-satisfied about these maladies, or we will wind up in conditions as undermining as the reappearance of multi drug resistant tuberculosis in the late 1980s or the influenza epidemic of 1918 in which 20–25 million people died around the world [17]. During many millennia of human cultural evolution, dispersal around the world, and subsequent interpopulation contact and conflict, there have been several distinct transitions in human ecology and in interpopulation interactions that have profoundly changed the patterns of infectious disease in human populations. The main transitions have been prehistoric and historic transitions. The prehistoric transition began, several million years ago. This entailed changes in exposures to mosquito and tick species. Likewise, the historic transition started when the growing reliance of early Homo species on meat eating, and associated activities such as the use of animal skins and fur would have increased exposure to enzootic agents and their vectors [including lice].
The early transition also illustrates the close interrelationship between the behavioural, social and environmental domains, as interacting influences on the emergence of infectious disease. Under evolutionary pressures, human behaviours slowly changed. The behavioural move to ground-dwelling upright-walking existence entailed various environmental changes. There were also consequent changes in social relationships, in family and tribal groupings, and in patterns of day-to-day interaction between these hunter-gatherer hominids. Clearly it is likely to be misleading to attempt to make a clear-cut differentiation of environmental and social influences on emerging infectious diseases [18].

Mindful Elements

The progression of human behaviour

In general, the advancement of civilization is seen as a positive advance for the prosperity of the human species, prompting an expanded span and personal satisfaction. The quickened progress in the physical environment [for the most part industrialization, urbanization, and nourishment] has led to additional opportunities for unfavorable consequences for human wellbeing. Over the most recent 50 years, the world's scene has been significantly altered by a tremendous territory that incorporates the utilization of natural assets, deforestation, and dam building. Urbanization has already been established among 55% of the world’s population [According to a report submitted by the United Nations [UN]]. It is also important to note in the present context that the increase in the number of infectious diseases arises mainly because of the human contact with the animal reservoirs, which is a result of changing patterns of land being used [2,19]. Anthropogenic ecological changes compromise human wellbeing by causing food and water shortage, expanding the dangers for catastrophic events and revocations of populations and increasing the risks of infectious maladies [20]. According to history, infectious diseases have had human progress modifying outcomes. During the Spanish influenza pandemic in 1918-1920, an estimated 50-100 million people overall capitulated to the disease [21]. The ever-changing environment due to par excellence civilization has made certain infectious diseases both rise and reappear. Pathogens which adjust to urban environments from rustic settings can spread in a progressively quick way and be a more noteworthy weight to the human services administrations [22]. The most classic example of the emerging/re-emerging microbial disease is a Lyme disease which is generally influenced by various changes made by mankind to the environment. The principal microbial agent of Lyme disease is Borrelia burgdorferi, most prevalent in the United States [US], specifically in North America. One of the most esoteric doctrines in the emergence of the disease is directly linked to the reforestation of farmland, which prompted the plentitude of the primary vector for this disease, a white-tailed deer [2,23]. According to a report by Centre for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], US, in 2018, approximately, 33000 cases of the same diseases were reported in the US and hence it has been deduced that every year at least 30000 people will be affected by Lyme disease.

Social impacts as aspects of human ecology

Several components accelerating the development of an infection can be distinguished.  Demographic factors are getting progressively common, proposing that microbial infections will proceed to develop and most likely increase and can be ascribed as an epidemic. Demographic changes fall into a few expansive zones like changes in populace, for example, the expanding pervasiveness of people with no defense to contamination; cultural changes, for example, increments in two pay or single parent families[which thus lead to a more noteworthy utilization of a daycare for kids and subsequently to an increment in ailment transmission] and developments of tainted or high hazard populaces by movement. Human conduct has given more chances to introduction and transmission of new and reappearing microbial disease and has expanded particular weight for antimicrobial resistance [16]. Effective rise of novel infectious agents generally requires their fast dissemination among human populaces. Subsequently, the expansion in population density has been a critical factor in disease emergence, as illustrated by plague epidemic in the 14th century or the dissemination of scrub typhus, caused by Orentia tsutsugamushi, among Allied troops during World War II [24]. Currently healthcare associated infections have also emerged to a high extent due to increased population density in hospital settings, as an example Clostridium difficile infection sprout out as a major public health challenge [25]. Over the most recent 20 years, clinical networks have been confronted with the spirit of multidrug-safe species, for example, methicillin-safe Staphylococcus aureus, multidrug-safe or broadly safe tuberculosis, vancomycin-safe enterococci, expanded range β-lactamase E. coli and carbapenemase-encoding Gram negative microbes. Therefore because of their rapid distribution among hospitalized patients and everybody, these might be viewed as rising pathogens and require huge consideration. In any case, this significant general medical problem is outside the extent of the current review. In addition, there have been noteworthy concerns about the advancement of virulent laboratory bacterial strains and bioterrorism, particularly after the 2001 Bacillus anthracis invasion. Although these viewpoints should be considered when talking about developing bacterial disease, they remain very uncommon [26]. Thus, re-emerging diseases are frequently conventionally comprehended and shown perilous to public health for which already dynamic general wellbeing or control measures have been allowed to pass. This is a situation that amazingly now applies all time and again, in both creating countries and downtowns of the industrialized world. The presence of reemerging maladies may routinely be a sign of the breakdown of open prosperity measures [27]. As the advancement in technology, science and medicine, is growing smoothly, there is a smooth increase in the total number of people who are immunocompromised people as well. This will lead to the emergence of microbial agents that were not known or recognized previously which is primarily related to cause an increase in infection susceptible populations [28].  Also, the world population is aging at an unprecedented rate of 1.2% [annually] in the 21st century, though it is less than it used to be in the 19th or 20th century [United Nations Population Fund, 2016], and the sole reason behind this decline is emerging diseases with every passing season.

Industrial concoction amidst technology-growth at a cost!

As the days are passing, every mankind has witnessed at least a number of changes in technology and transformed industry. These technological advances have driven us to idiosyncratic complacency, efficiency and life expectancy. On the contrary, there are technologies that are unexpectedly linked with the emergence of diseases. These mainly include diseases like Legionnaires which is caused by pathogenic microorganism, Legionella which belongs to the genus of pathogenic bacteria, and mainly happens because of  the extensive use of air conditioners or cooling towers, toxic shock syndrome is the another disease hit by the bacteria which is mostly prevalent in females who uses absorbent tampons for a longer period of time, mainly this disease results from the toxins produced by microbes such as Staphylococcus or Streptococcus bacteria, other disease in the list is caused by the dangerous form of Escherichia coli that is Escherichia coli O157:H7, which is a colon bacillus bacterium that usually resides in the human colon and causes serious problems like Hemorrhagic colitis, and one of the reason of having this disease is the consumption of ground meat in the form of fast food [16]. The other side of the coin is also doing pretty well in promoting diseases i.e. industries whose goods are directly related to humans. To be specific, the food industry has received a tremendous number of changes in its various operations, such as how food is produced, how they can be preserved and processed. Researchers have shown their concern on food items having a longer shelf life and can only be preserved by refrigeration, which allows Listeria, a microorganism that mostly grows at the temperature same as in refrigeration [29]. The 'one health' movement appropriately relates natural and animal prosperity with human well-being. Changes in the agriculturally evolved way of life, social changes and advances in the discovery and declaring frameworks, annexed with bacterial adaptation and evolution, may incite certain microorganisms turning out to be rising zoonotic pathogens. Occurrences of such incorporate shigatoxigenic/enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli [STEC/EHEC] and Campylobacter spp. in the meat chain, Cronobacter spp. in newborn child milk formula, Arcobacter spp., Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O3/4, parasites, for instance, Cyclospora on fruits and Giarda in water [30]. Normally, people expect for their well-being when they visit any health care center for their health-related issues, but advances in technologies in the healthcare industry have initiated the medium for the movement of infections. Using artificial heart valves, plastic tubes for draining urine, prosthetic joints and artificial skin materials holds the risk of attracting microbes to the surfaces of these synthetic materials and the infections caused by such microorganisms are quite difficult to eradicate [31]. Since hospitals/health care units are the only place for such kinds of diseases and are also perfect grounds for breeding and transferring infections among other patients. Since due to long term service, it is a matter of concern and it must be looked at seriously [2].

Ecological impact

Disclosures that emerging and re-emerging pathogens emanate themselves in environmental change has made a pressing need to see how these ecological alterations sway ailment trouble. In the 20th century, general wellbeing systems for the control of irresistible diseases advanced along a reductionist direction that stressed antibodies, anti-infection agents, pesticides, and hindrances to contamination. These advances brought about further enhancements in the general's wellbeing and deservedly kept on affecting a lot of biomedicine. Recently, research on the linkages between natural change and infection has multiplied, grasping different sorts and levels of anthropogenic unsettling influence, pathogenic procedure, and logical methodology. Integrative audits on natural change and irresistible ailment have assumed a basic job for the early field by refining results from unique sources [32]. For the last 50 years, mankind is facing numerous changes in its climate, which have remarkably modified our ecology and simultaneously increasing contacts between humans and microbes carrying vehicles [creatures other than humans]. Since 1976 the World Health Organization has recorded more than 40 emerging and reemerging infectious diseases and most of them like malaria or dengue fever have shown their presence because of the direct changes in the landscape [33]. Climate changes impart a significant role in the emergence of many microbial diseases, one of them is the V. cholerae that burst out in Bangladesh in the year 1992, where the species was reactivating and propagating among other marine species under favourable conditions such as warming, a common climate change affecting wellbeing of mankind [34]. The rising frequency of Lyme disease connected to habitat fragmentation, and malaria, connected to deforestation in the Amazon, are a few models [35,36]. The severe acute respiratory condition [SARS] flare-up in Asia demonstrated a comparative linkage to bushmeat reaping. The worldwide pace of tropical deforestation proceeds at stunning levels with almost 2-3% of forest habitats lost every year. In response to this ecological destruction is an exponential development in human and wildlife struggle, yielding novel presentations to new diseases for all species concerned [37]. A few scientists hypothesized about a competent repository of population increment while having been taken off alone, paying little heed to environment type, and that the most raised disease rates will happen when these skilled repositories are the predominant species [38]. In tropical networks, landscape change can prompt significant movements in ailment designs; for instance, after woodland clearing, flooding induces dysentery and cholera episodes [39]. Techniques for a superior comprehension of natural human ailment interactions incorporate cultivating coordinated effort among disciplines; subsidizing surveillance for rising diseases in wildlife; and distinguishing species that may fill in as sentinels of ecosystem wellbeing. Sentinel species can be chosen for their capacity to reflect normal annoyances. In view of their life history and physiological qualities, chosen species can provide insightful data about natural changes at different spatial, transient, and trophic scales [40]. At last it can be said that a gathering of species due to various environmental changes might be reasonable for giving an "umbrella" impact in checking the aggregate effects of numerous ecological factors that make the multifaceted nature of an emerging disease [41].

Tourism, trade and merchandise

From the appearance of present-day business flight during the 1950s, and in the course of recent decades, universal nonmilitary personnel travel all around has encountered a continuous development from 25 million out of 1950 to 278 million out of 1980, 528 million out of 1995, and 1087 million out of 2013. It is normal that worldwide vacationer appearances all around will have an increment by 3.3% per year from 2010 to 2030 to arrive at 1.8 billion by 2030 [42]. Emergence of diseases has potential connections with travelling across the world. Relocation of people has been the pathway for scattering irresistible illnesses all through written history and will keep on molding the development, recurrence, and spread of diseases in geographic zones and populations. The current volume, speed, and reach of movement are remarkable. The outcomes of movement reach out past the explorer to the populace visited and the biological niches [43]. The universal dissemination of microorganisms, vectors and tainted people and animals represent a worldwide public health danger and requires consideration at the local and global levels. Some instances are mentioned here. Among two deaths announced in 2009, the first was a 32-year-old male with constant hepatitis B, a Sudanese who was born in Eritrea, died following 6 days of visceral leishmaniasis and sepsis. The second was an 86-year-old Norwegian male with ceaseless obstructive pneumonic ailment and Parkinson's disease, who died from Acinetobacter sp. pneumonia 4 days in the wake of coming back from Spain. Dengue was one of the most incessant reasons for fever among returning travelers [44]. It is recorded that dengue contamination has been known to be endemic in India for more than two centuries. India saw an extensive dengue fever flare-up in the year 2012 [45]. Going to visit companions and family members is a reported hazard factor for the procurement of movement related ailments, as individuals going consequently will dwell in nearby homes, travel for a long period of time and may neglect to perceive the well-being dangers natural to venturing out to their original country [46,47].

Antimicrobial resistance

Because microbes are evolving continuously, the extended mortality and morbidity rate related to infections by antibiotic resistant microorganisms is one of the primary worldwide dangers human beings need to confront these days. The phenomenon of antibiotic-resistant [AMR] microbial emergence has befallen as a result of the universality of antimicrobials in the environment, which is an evolutionary practice on microbial adaptation, also an exhibition of the intensity of natural selection [27]. Recently, research has been centered among others around the natural component of AMR particularly in domesticated animals cultivating, wastewater treatment, and in medical clinic settings. However, other assembled conditions in which individuals ordinarily burn through the vast majority of their lives [e.g., private homes and workplaces] have been regularly ignored in these investigations, regardless of their expected pertinence for the development and spread of AMR [48]. One of the conceivable, versatile reactions of microbes under antibiotic selection incorporates the rise of antimicrobial opposition. Various observational investigations have recommended that resistant strains cause superfluous diseases as opposed to supplanting those brought about by susceptible microorganisms [49]. The European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System [EARSS, renamed EARS-Net in 2010], keeps up the biggest database of routinely gathered antibiotic susceptibility   information for bacteremia detaches around the world [50]. With the due course of time antimicrobial resistance in community respiratory pathogens shifts among nations. A few countries have revealed recent improvement in antimicrobial resistance; for example, an abatement in penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains has been noted, yet protection from macrolide is still developing and a few instances of levofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae have been accounted for. The clinical effect of antimicrobial opposition in CAP is discussed. No unmistakable increment in CAP-related mortality is accounted for with penicillin-safe strains, yet this isn't the situation with other medication safe S. pneumoniae [macrolides or levofloxacin-safe S. pneumoniae] [51]. To that amount AMR rises and expands, this will directly affect anti-infection remedy in the medical clinics and primary cares as well. Particularly in primary care, antibiotics are offered dependent on signs and symptoms without microbiological assessment. When AMR arrives at a specific basic level for penicillin-resistant pneumococci, for instance, this will provoke the utilization of different anti-toxins, which will be the more broad-spectrum agents, in turn it will expand the selection pressure preferring safe organisms. This will thus fortify the inclination toward favoring the broad-spectrum operators, therefore making a winding impact or an endless loop. This has been the situation for S. aureus and is presently occurring in the treatment of suspected pneumococcal diseases in nations with high AMR levels [52]. Managing AMR requires fidelity to infection control and restricted antibiotic use. Every health care facility, especially hospitals should initiate antibiotic stewardship programs [ASPs] that can reduce AMR and associated costs. ASPs function best with the collaboration and support of physicians, infection control teams, nurses, microbiology laboratories, pharmacy services, quality management teams, and information systems. However, if they depend on the availability of diagnostic laboratories and information systems, it may be a challenge to implement them where there are limited trained personnel and resources [53]. Thus, AMR is seen as a genuine wellbeing emergency that must be firmly taken care of on a couple of fronts.

Inspection, Introspection and Preclusion

Understanding where transmission of infectious disease occurs is a vital part of general wellbeing. With data about where emerging disease transmission is happening, public health intercessions can be focused to the areas and populaces affected. The data that a robust infectious disease reconnaissance framework provides therefore, empowers the control of emergence and transmission, even to the point of disposal from geographic zones [54]. Basically, the core of preventive medication has splurged on surveillance which is the key factor to recognize new or emerging infectious diseases, to track down the prevalence of more established ailment thus rapid response can be observed quite easily. An all-around structured and equipped actualized infectious disease surveillance program can give a way to distinguish irregular bunches of illness, archive the geographic and demographic spread of an outbreak, gauge the extent of the issue, depict the common history of the sickness, recognize factors answerable for rise, encourage lab and epidemiological exploration, and evaluate the accomplishment of explicit intercession endeavors [10]. Disease observation frequently is a passive procedure that depends on individual healthcare workers who report examples of abnormal or especially infectious human disease, as a rule to a wellbeing administration office. In different cases, increasingly formal reconnaissance can happen, in which public health workers effectively search for instances of illness and report their discoveries normally to a central data assortment point. The coordination endeavors of multilateral global associations, for example, the WHO, plays a major role for every ecumenical surveillance of infectious diseases. Also, surveillance is imperative to any malady control exertion and essential if that effort aims for eradication. Without these organizations, events of complete eradication of diseases like smallpox and polio would be little more than dreams [10]. The World Health Organization [WHO] has additionally attempted to improve observation and spreaded the required data on new illness issues. Data is made quickly accessible through the Weekly Epidemiologic Record and the WHO web page [55]. As the various examples mentioned above [section 4.5], travel is a noteworthy factor in the development and spread of irresistible infections. Along these lines, voyagers ought to be focused as a priority group for surveillance and anticipating preventive measures [56]. In addition to monitoring disease burden, surveillance endeavors ought to be extended and expanded to incorporate the ability to perceive beforehand obscure sickness or uncommon outbreaks of infection that may have worldwide importance. With the present fast and frequently mass developments of individuals worldwide; creatures, and merchandise, the transnational spread of infectious disease can happen rapidly and easily. Global surveillance [particularly for recently perceived irresistible ailments] is therefore critical in reacting to and containing microbial threats before confined flare-ups form into provincial or overall epidemic [2].

Experience of emerging microbial threats, the re-emergence of infectious disease problems and the possibility of bioterrorism have shown the requirement for execution of irresistible infection surveillance programmes. A pivotal role has been executed by clinical microbiology laboratories in these events, as they are the preferred choice for detection of emerging health complications and thus participate in fetching the design of reporting strategies, distributing data and intervention programs. The caution and reaction of microbiology research centers in infectious disease observation projects ought to be performed with the execution of normal work processes in microbiology labs. A portion of these procedures can be created in collaboration with research labs if this movement isn't incorporated in a similar lab. Basic workflow of a lab consists of: (1) specimen management, (2) specimen processing [methods], and (3) results and data interpretation [57]. Sensitive surveillance can be regarded as the best guard in this brisk new milieu of evolving, adapting, and profoundly versatile pathogens, on a worldwide scale as it  quarterbacks procedures expected to distinguish an unusual event, whether including an upsurge in instances of a notable endemic infection, the presence of a formerly obscure pathogen, or an outbreak brought about by the intentional utilization of a bio-weapon to cause harm. As anyone might expect, outbreaks of both recently recognized diseases and notable pandemic inclined illnesses happen most often in nations that do not have the epidemiological research facility to distinguish them rapidly and prevent their spread. Consequently, proceeding with observation, upheld by fortifying of national limits, is additionally expected to keep the universal network arranged to give help, considering a legitimate concern for shielding worldwide well-being security, at whatever point required [58].

In the middle of diagnostics, lies therapeutics challenges in identification and remediation

How beautifully it has been mentioned that, “Without diagnosis, medicine is blind” [59]. Thus, sufficient and prompt treatment to sicknesses cannot proceed appropriately without diagnosis in any case. Exquisite and fast analytic testing not just paves the way towards proper treatment yet additionally plays in forestalling the transmission of infections [60].  Contrasted with other diseases, irresistible infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms can be exponentially augmented among populations in a generally brief timeframe in this way undermining the overall population wellbeing and possibly the economy. It is evaluated that a colossal amount of population is in peril [61]. As infectious diseases stay exceptionally critical medical issues around the globe, a focal part of the overall exertion to dispense with or ruin these illnesses will lay on having extraordinarily improved diagnostic capacities just as increasingly viable treatments cum immunizations. The absence of availability of numerous analytic and chemotherapeutic agents to contaminated tissues in patients with an assortment of irresistible maladies stays an imposing snag to viable fixes, particularly for constant and repeating diseases because of intracellular pathogens of macrophages [62]. With developing acknowledgement that the human-related microbiota is a part of wellbeing and furthermore numerous illness forms, techniques focusing on the microbiota are not too far off. Probiotics are live microorganisms with realized medical advantages and are increasing expanding ubiquity for use in the gastrointestinal tract. Prebiotics are substrates that support the development of helpful microscopic organisms. More examination is expected to recognize probiotic strains and prebiotic substrates that may profit wellbeing. In addition to therapeutic strategies, diagnostic tests based on the microbiota can possibly give more accuracy to the microbiota administration and treatment of issues. Microbial communities colonizing the human body are stunningly delicate to their basic condition and evolving conditions. Along these lines, microorganisms can quickly change in number because of bother, giving a delicate readout of nature in which, they flourish [63].  Disease diagnostics make practical and effective use of some basic methodologies, such as, “Classic” [culture and microscopy], “Biochemical” [colorimetric and immunoassays] and “Advanced Biotechnology” [molecular and biomolecular techniques for detection and identification] [64,65]. Most assays at present utilized in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases are not required to recommend a specific antimicrobial operator. Conventional microbial culture, microscopy, immunoassays, and molecular assay are generally utilized in the finding of these maladies. Also, a portion of these tests, including Rapid Plasma Reagin [RPR] titers and HIV/HCV viral load are utilized to evaluate treatment reaction, paying no heed to the antimicrobial agent[s] given. Different measures decide genotypic opposition or phenotypic vulnerability and obstruction of a pathogen to a particular agent or panel of antimicrobial agents. Accordingly, a few tests can satisfy the ideology of companion diagnostics by distinguishing patients that may profit by a specific restorative item. This may incorporate surveying the hazard for genuine symptoms because of treatment with a specific therapeutic product or observing reaction to treatment with a specific helpful item to alter treatment to accomplish improved security or viability [66]. There is a dire prerequisite for new antibacterial administrators as the spread of antibacterial check has become an overall risk to general prosperity, decreasing the choices open to human services suppliers to direct perilous defilement. Society must change how current and new antibacterial are used, both in human and animal husbandry, in order to draw out their prolonged utility.

Challenges in three key zones have made various pharmaceutical organizations stop research and Development [R&D] interest here which has contributed to an absence of new antibiotics being developed:

Unparalleled scientific challenges and logical difficulties related with antibacterial revelation research

Administrative and clinical difficulties; and

Mercantile challenges because of constrained monetary engaging quality of contributing in antibacterial R&D [67].

Contagions identifying symptomatic tests must have the option to pinpoint causative agents with the goal that antibiotics can be chosen adequately, however it is likewise important that drug resistant phenotypes are recognized to guarantee that compelling antimicrobial treatment is managed [68,69]. Most irresistible illness testing is performed utilizing traditional microbiological strategies that depend on the way of life of clinical examples and ensuing antimicrobial susceptibility testing [70,71]. Microscopic organisms must be refined to expand their numbers to levels perceivable by optical density-based strategies, precultured as unadulterated isolates, and afterward investigated for anti-microbial obstruction. Stock weakening or antimicrobial gradient techniques permit the count of least inhibitory groupings of therapeutics and the recognizable proof of safe phenotypes. Although these are manual strategies, mechanized testing frameworks are additionally utilized in clinical testing labs that permit exceptionally government sanctioned testing. Regardless, the general turnaround times of these tests are long, frequently 72 h or more, which requires the treatment of genuine contaminations without test results or the deferral of treatment for less genuine contaminations, prompting irresistible illness spread or the improvement of difficulties [72]. One course of action that has been looked for after to truncate the deferrals realized by culture-based infectious disease testing is the improvement of nuclear level estimates that use enzymatic amplification of microorganism nucleic acids. As opposed to trusting that microbes will increase to adequate levels for investigation, genomic DNA is intensified utilizing strategies like polymerase chain response [PCR] and distinguished utilizing fluorescence readout [73]. This methodology can lessen the time required for examination from days to hours. An assortment of industrially accessible sub-atomic strategies is currently utilized clinically for irresistible illness determination and are having an effect on the viability of irresistible infection the board [74-76]. As this procedure presents a way to speed infectious disease conclusion, molecular examination faces impediments when expansive obstruction profiles must be reviewed. For instance, wide range β-lactamase action can be seen in bacterial strains conveying an assortment of opposition qualities [77]. PCR-based techniques have constrained multiplexing and in this way are hard to apply to enormous groups of arrangements. Additionally, already uncharacterized opposition factors are not amiable to molecular level testing. In this way, it is important to create cutting edge innovations that speed the direct phenotypic testing of microorganisms and screen the impacts of antimicrobial treatments [78]. Subsisting microbiology-based strategies for bacterial recognizable proof and anti-toxin opposition testing depend on observing societies containing high quantities of bacterial cells and require the development of the way of life to advance until the quantities of cells can be perused out spectroscopically. Late advances in single-cell checking may give new arrangements that can speed bacterial investigation by observing changes in development on a cell-by-cell level [79-81]. Another zone that is fundamental to the age of next generation bacterial profiling multitude is the advancement of exceptionally delicate microbial identification techniques. Traditional discovery frameworks depend on optical thickness estimations, which are not subtle and sensitive. By supplanting this identification methodology with different investigation techniques, quicker discovery could be accomplished by utilizing upgraded affability to peruse out phenotypic data more quickly. An assortment of electrophoretic, electrochemical, mechanical, and mass spectrometry–based frameworks have been produced for this application that may speed the recognizable proof of antimicrobial safe organisms [82-87]. As of now, clinical medicines in the field of irresistible illnesses are commonly intended for the "average patient" as "one-size-fits-all-approach", which is protected and viable for certain patients, yet for nobody else [88].

Accuracy medication gives an extraordinary potential to improve anticipation and treatment for infectious diseases, by considering singular changeability, frequently characterized at the molecular and cellular levels [89]. Many host varieties recognized in human genomic, pharmacogenomic, and proteomic contemplates assume significant jobs in pathogenesis and forecast of irresistible ailments, and the security and adequacy of the restorative items. new initiative on precision medicine [90,91]. The ID [Identification] step is key to deciding the best anti-microbials to be utilized in the battle against the disease, and a quick distinguishing proof of the etiology of the microorganisms can decidedly influence the patient's consideration. The most significant necessities for the ID procedures, close to their precision, are the quickness of the reaction and the cost-viability. In fact, recognizable proof through customary microbiological strategies includes a subculture on strong media with 18-24h brooding, before the ID step, generally performed by utilizing biochemical tests or enzyme assays [92]. The improvement of new and progressively exact recognizable proof strategies has incredibly altered the field of microbiology consistently. Basically,  the quantity of distinguished bacterial species increment occurs constantly [13] henceforth, presentation of sub-atomic strategies, for example, real time polymerase chain response [RT-PCR], gene sequencing and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry [MALDI-TOF MS] [93], approximately 500 new species are spoken of evidently  each year [94]. As a matter of fact, since their induction, such molecular techniques have fundamentally changed the time-frame for bacterial recognizable proof [ID] [94,95].


The entire health fraternity has begun to contemplate with earnest intent as the rise of infectious disease reflects ecological, environmental, social, economic, political factors which are inclusively connected. Various powers working in creating nations specifically, including urbanization, deforestation, changes in atmosphere, populace development, poverty, ailing health, political precariousness, and even fear-based oppression i.e. terrorism have made the conditions for a few irresistible infections to turn out to be new or intermittent dangers. Ameliorative capacity to react to microbial dangers will require huge endeavors over time. Given the inevitable idea of numerous irresistible infectious dangers, in any case, it is important that quick moves be made toward accomplishing this limit. Involvement of youthful graduates in the biosciences has demonstrated to be an effective system for meeting the objectives distinguished by government organizations answerable for improving the complex health factors locally. To devise and execute successful anticipation and control procedures, the elements impacting the development of irresistible illness must be perceived and tended to at a worldwide level. On the other hand, we can say, efforts related to mechanized revealing from research facilities are highly effective in the improvement of other new frameworks, for example, those consolidating far off detecting, just as robotized frameworks of syndromic surveillance. In this review paper we have tried to focus on exemplary dangers related to microbial infections in a broader aspect.


  1. Morse SS (1995) Factors in the emergence of infectious diseases. Emerg Infect Dis 1: 7-15.
  2. Lederberg J, Hamburg MA, Smolinski MS (2003) Emergence detection and response. Microbial threats to health, USA, ISBN-10: 0-309-50730-8.
  3. WHO (2004) A brief guide to emerging infectious diseases and zoonoses. World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, Switzerland, pp. 1-100.
  4. WHO (2015) Asia pacific strategy for emerging diseases (APSED). World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, Switzerland, pp. 1-64.
  5. Satcher D (1995) Emerging Infections: getting ahead of the curve. Emerg Infect Dis 1: 1-6.
  6. Taylor LH, Latham SM, Woolhouse ME (2001) Risk factors for human disease emergence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356: 983-989.
  7. Dong J, Olano JP, McBride JW, Walker DH (2008) Emerging pathogens: challenges and successes of molecular diagnostics. J Mol Diagn 10: 185-197.
  8. Woolhouse M, Gaunt E (2009) Microbial evolution and co-adaptation: a tribute to the life and scientific legacies of 339 joshua Lederberg: workshop summary. Institute of Medicine (US) Forum on Microbial Threats 20945572.
  9. Besant JD, Das J, Sargent EH (2013) Proximal bacterial lysis and detection in nanoliter wells using electrochemistry. ACS Nano 7(2): 8183-8189.
  10. Lederberg J, Shope RE, Oaks (2014) Emerging infections: microbial threats to health in the United States. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Emerging Microbial Threats to Health PMID: 25121245.
  11. Weissmann G (2005) Rats, lice, and zinsser. Emerg I nfect Dis 11(3): 492-496.
  12. Armelagos GJ, Barnes KC, Lin J (1996) Disease in human evolution: the re-emergence of infectious disease in the third epidemiological transition. Anthro Notes 18(3): 1-7.
  13. Jones KE (2008) Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451: 990-993.
  14. Dethlefsen L (2007) An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human–microbe mutualism and disease. Nature 449: 811-818.
  15. Wolfe ND (2007) Origins of major human infectious diseases. Nature 447: 279-283.
  16. Cohen ML (2000) Changing patterns of infectious disease. Nature 406(6797): 762-767.
  17. Armstrong GL, Conn LA, Pinner Y (1999) Trends in infectious disease mortality in the United States during the 20th J Am Med Assoc 281: 61-66.
  18. McMichael AJ (2004) Environmental and social influences on emerging infectious diseases: past, present and future. philosophical transactions of the royal society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 359(1447): 1049-1058.
  19. Waldvogel FA (2004) Infectious diseases in the 21st century: old challenges and new opportunities. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 8(1): 5-12.
  20. Myers SS, Patz JA (2009) Emerging threats to human health from global environmental change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34: 223-252.
  21. Johnson NP, Mueller J (2001) Updating the accounts: global mortality of the 1918–1920 “Spanish” influenza pandemic. Bull Hist Med 76: 105-115.
  22. WHO (2010) Unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings? Hidden Cities, Switzerland, pp. 1-118.
  23. Barbour AG, Fish D (1993) The biological and social phenomenon of Lyme disease. Science 260(5114): 1610-1616.
  24. Vouga M, Greub G (2016) Emerging bacterial pathogens: the past and beyond. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 22(1): 12-21.
  25. Chandrabali Ghose (2013) Clostridium difficile infection in the twenty-first century. Emerging Microbes & Infections 2(1): 1-8.
  26. Barras V, Greub G (2014) History of biological warfare and bioterrorism. Clin Microbial Infect 20: 497-502.
  27. Morse S (2004) Factors and determinants of disease emergence. Revue scientifique et technique-Office international des epizooties 23(2): 443-452.
  28. Dixon DM, McNeil MM, Cohen ML, Gellin BG, La Montagne JR (1996) Fungal infections: a growing threat. Public Health Rep 111(3): 226-235.
  29. Hennessy TW, Hedberg CW, Slutsker L (1996) A national outbreak of Salmonella enteritidis infections from ice cream. N Engl J Med 334: 1281-1286.
  30. Duffy G, Lynch OA, Cagney C (2008) Tracking emerging zoonotic pathogens from farm to fork. Meat science 78(1-2): 34-42.
  31. Almroth G, Ekermo B, Mansson AS, Svensson G, Widell A (2002) Detection and prevention of hepatitis C in dialysis patients and renal transplant recipients. J Intern Med 251(2): 119-28.
  32. Eisenberg, Joseph NS (2007) Environmental determinants of infectious disease: a framework for tracking causal links and guiding public health research. Environmental Health Perspectives 115(8): 1216-1223.
  33. The World Health Report (1996) Fighting disease, fostering development. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 143.
  34. Epstein PR, Ford TE. Colwell RR (1993) Marine ecosystems. Lancet 342: 1216-1219.
  35. Molyneux DH (2001) Vector-borne infections in the tropics and health policy issues in the twenty-first century. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 95: 233-238.
  36. Ostfeld RS, Keesing (2000) Biodiversity and disease risk: the case of Lyme disease. Conserv Biol 14: 722-728.
  37. Aguirre AA, Ostfeld R, Tabor RA, House CA, Pearl MC (2002) Conservation medicine: ecological health in practice. Oxford University Press 407.
  38. Suzan G, Giermakowski JT, Marce E, Suzan AH, Armien B, et al. (2006) Modeling hantavirus reservoir species dominance in high seroprevalence areas on the Azuero Peninsula of Panama. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 74(6): 1103-10.
  39. Patz JA, Daszak P, Tabor GM, Aguirre AA, Pearl M, et al. (2004) Unhealthy landscapes: policy recommendations on land use change and infectious disease emergence. Environmental Health Perspectives 112(10): 1092-1098.
  40. Tabor GM, Aguirre AA (2004) Ecosystem health and sentinel species: adding an ecological element to the proverbial “canary in the mineshaft. EcoHealth 1(25): 226-228.
  41. Aguirrea AA, Taborb GM (2008) Global factors driving emerging infectious diseases. Virus 1(1): 7.
  42. UNWTO (2020) World tourism barometer: growth in international tourist arrivals continues to outpace the economy. UNWTO Publications 18(1).
  43. Wilson ME (1995) Travel and the emergence of infectious diseases. Emerging Infectious Diseases 1(2): 39.
  44. Odolini S, Parola P, Gkrania KE (2012) Travel-related imported infections in Europe. EuroTravNet 18(5): 468-474.
  45. Bandyopadhyay B, Bhattacharyya I, Adhikary S, Konar J, Dawar N, et al. (2013) A comprehensive study on the 2012 dengue fever outbreak in Kolkata, India. International Scholarly Research Notices.
  46. Ryan ET, Wilson ME, Kain KC (2002) Illness after international travel. N Engl J Med 347(7): 505-516.
  47. Leder K, Torresi J, Libman MD, Cramer JD (2013) GeoSentinel surveillance of illness in returned travelers 2007-2011. Ann Intern Med 158(6): 456-468.
  48. Mahnert A, Moissl EC, Zojer M (2019) Man-made microbial resistances in built environments. Nat Commun 10: 968.
  49. Wyllie DH, Crook DW, Peto TE (2006) Mortality after Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in two hospitals in Oxfordshire, 1997-2003: cohort study. BMJ 333(7562): 281.
  50. Giske, Christian G, Giuseppe C (2010) Supranational surveillance of antimicrobial resistance: The legacy of the last decade and proposals for the future. Drug Resistance Updates 13(4-5): 93-98.
  51. Albert RK, Spiro SG, Jett JR (2008) Clinical respiratory medicine. In: Stephen G, Gerard A, Alvar Agustí (Eds.), Elsevier Health Sciences (4th edn), Elsevier, Netherlands, pp. 1-30.
  52. Quah SR (2016) International encyclopedia of public health. (2nd edn), Academic Press, pp. 4470.
  53. Ryan ET, Hill DR, Solomon T, Endy TP, Aronson N (2019) Hunter's tropical medicine and emerging infectious diseases e-book. (10th edn), Elsevier, Netherlands.
  54. Larsen D, Dinero RE, Asiago Reddy E, Hyatt Green, Sandra Lane, et al. (2020) A review of infectious disease surveillance to inform public health action against the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Infectious Disease pp.1-17.
  55. WHO (2015) Revision and updating of the international health regulations. World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, Switzerland, pp. 1-2.
  56. Ostroff SM, Kozarsky P (1998) Emerging infectious diseases and travel medicine. Infectious Disease Clinics 12(1): 231-241.
  57. Cantón R (2005) Role of the microbiology laboratory in infectious disease surveillance, alert and response. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 11: 3-8.
  58. Heymann DL, Rodier GR (2001) Hot spots in a wired world: WHO surveillance of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 1(5): 345-353.
  59. Schroeder Lee, Timothy Amukele, Madhukar Pai (2016) Why the world needs an essential diagnostics list. N Engl J Med 374: 2511-2514.
  60. Chen H, Liu K, Li Z, Wang P (2019) Point of care testing for infectious diseases. Clinica Chimica Acta 493: 138-147.
  61. Hwang, Hwang J (2018) Biomarkers in infectious diseases. Dis Markers 8509127.
  62. Azad AK, Rajaram MVS, Schlesinger LS (2014) Exploitation of the Macrophage Mannose Receptor (CD206) in Infectious Disease Diagnostics and Therapeutics. J Cytol Molecul Biol 1(1): 5.
  63. Grice Elizabeth (2014) The skin microbiome: potential for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to cutaneous disease. Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery 33(4): 1468-1477.
  64. Srivastava S, Singh PK, Vatsalya V, Karch RC (2018) Developments in the diagnostic techniques of infectious diseases: rural and urban prospective. Advances in Infectious Diseases 8(3): 121.
  65. Klimašauskas S, Mažutis L (2019) Editorial overview: Current advances in analytical biotechnology: from single molecules to whole organisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol 55: 3-5.
  66. Dailey PJ, Elbeik T, Holodniy M (2020) Companion and complementary diagnostics for infectious diseases. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 1(18): 619-636.
  67. Payne DJ, Miller LF, Findlay D, Anderson J, Marks L (2015) Time for a change: addressing R&D and commercialization challenges for antibacterials. Phil Trans R Soc B 370: 20140086.
  68. Jorgensen JH, Ferraro MJ (2009) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: a review of general principles and contemporary practices. Clin Infect Dis 49: 1749-1755.
  69. Wilkowske CJ (1991) General principles of antimicrobial therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 66(3): 931–941.
  70. Humphrey JH, Lightbown JW (1952) A general theory for plate assay of antibiotics with some practical applications. J Gen Microbiol 7: 129-143.
  71. Dalgaard P, Ross T, Kamperman L (1994) Estimation of bacterial growth rates from turbidimetric and viable count data. Int J Food Microbiol 23: 391-404.
  72. Dryden M, Johnson AP, Ashiru O (2011) Using antibiotics responsibly: right drug, right time, right dose, right duration. J Antimicrob Chemother 66: 2441-2443.
  73. Espy MJ, Uhl JR, Sloan L (2006) Real-time pcr in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing. Clin Microbiol Rev 19(1): 165-256.
  74. Gazin M, Lammens C, Goossens H (2012) Evaluation of Geneohm Vanr and Xpert Vana/Vanb Molecular Assays for the Rapid Detection of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31: 273-276.
  75. Wolk DM Picton E, Johnson D (2009) Multicenter evaluation of the cepheid xpert methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) test as a rapid screening method for detection of mrsa in nares. J Clin Microbiol 47: 758-764.
  76. Stamper PD, Cai M, Lema C (2007) Comparison of the Bd geneohm vanr assay to culture for identification of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in rectal and stool specimens. J Clin Microbiol 45: 3360-3365.
  77. Drieux L, Brossier F, Sougakoff W (2008) Phenotypic detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in enterobacteriaceae: review and bench guide. Clin Microbiol Infect 14(1): 90-103.
  78. Kelley SO (2017) New technologies for rapid bacterial identification and antibiotic resistance profiling. Translating Life Sciences Innovation 22(2): 113-121.
  79. Choi J, Jung YG, Kim J (2013) Rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing by tracking single cell growth in a microfluidic agarose channel system. Lab Chip 13: 280-287.
  80. Choi J, Yoo J, Lee M (2014) A rapid antimicrobial susceptibility test based on single-cell morphological analysis. Sci Trans Med 6(267): 174.
  81. Long Z, Nugent E, Javer A (2013) Microfluidic chemostat for measuring single cell dynamics in bacteria. Lab Chip 13: 947-954.
  82. Chung C, Cheng I, Yang W (2011) Antibiotic susceptibility test based on the dielectrophoretic behavior of elongated escherichia coli with cephalexin treatment. Biomicrofluidics 5: 21102.
  83. Ertl P, Wagner M, Corton E (2003) Rapid identification of viable escherichia coli subspecies with an electrochemical screen-printed biosensor array. Biosens Bioelectron 18: 907-916.
  84. Longo G, Alonso SL, Rio LM (2013) Rapid detection of bacterial resistance to antibiotics using afm cantilevers as nanomechanical sensors. Nat Nanotechnol 8: 522-526.
  85. Longo G, Rio LM, Trampuz A (2013) Antibiotic induced modifications of the stiffness of bacterial membranes. J Microbiol Meth 93: 80-84.
  86. Carbonnelle E, Mesquita C, Bille E (2011) MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry tools for bacterial identification in clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Biochem 44(2): 104-109.
  87. Le Dorze M, Gault N, Foucrier A (2015) Performance and impact of a rapid method combining mass spectrometry and direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing on treatment adequacy of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect 21(468): 1-6.
  88. Batrla R, Jordan BW (2015) Personalized health care beyond oncology: new indications for immunoassay-based companion diagnostics. Ann NY Acad Sci 1346: 71-80.
  89. Collins FS, Varmus H (2015) A new initiative on precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 372(9): 793-795.
  90. Wang L, McLeod HL, Weinshilboum RM (2011) Genomics and drug response. New England Journal of Medicine 364(12): 1144-1153.
  91. Wilkin TJ, Gulick RM (2012) CCR5 antagonism in HIV infection: current concepts and future opportunities. Annu Rev Med 63: 81-93.
  92. Van Belkum A, Durand G, Peyret M, Chatellier S, Zambardi G, et al. (2013) Rapid clinical bacteriology and its future impact. Annals of Laboratory Medicine 33(1): 14-27.
  93. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, et al. (2009) Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clinical Infectious Diseases 49(4): 543-551.
  94. Janda JM, Abbott SL (2007) 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification in the diagnostic laboratory: pluses, perils, and pitfalls. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 45(9): 2761-2764.
  95. Fournier PE, Drancourt M, Colson P, Rolain JM, La Scola B, et al. (2013) Modern clinical microbiology: new challenges and solutions. Nat Rev Microbiol 11(8): 574-585.

© 2020 Anjani Kumar Upadhyay. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.