Crimson Publishers Publish With Us Reprints e-Books Video articles

Full Text

Aspects in Mining & Mineral Science

The Manto-Type Copper Mineralization in the Eocene Volcano-Sedimentary Sequences, Western Alborz-Azarbayjan Belt, NW Iran

Ghasem Nabatian*

Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, Iran

*Corresponding author: Ghasem Nabatian, Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

Submission: April 05, 2021;Published: June 02, 2021

DOI: 10.31031/AMMS.2021.06.000647

ISSN 2578-0255
Volume6 Issue5

Opinion

Introduction

Iran is located in the middle part of the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt and resulted from the evolution of the at least three Tethyan oceans (Proto, Paleo and Neo-Tethys). The evolution of Tethyan oceans caused to formation of different types of mineralization in Iran during Precambrian- Cambrian to recent time. The manto-type copper deposits is one of the most important deposits in Iran which occurred within the Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Arc (UDMA), Lut block, Sanandaj-Sirjan Magmatic-Metamorphic Zone (SaSZ), Sabzevar subzone and mainly Alborz Magmatic Belt (AMB). The most significant magmatic activity occurred in the AMB during the Eocene time which consists of volcanic and volcano-sedimentary rocks with alkaline to shoshonitic affinity [1-3]. These rocks are investigated as Karaj Formation with 3-5km thickness which developed in a back-arc basin [1]. The volcanic and volcanoclastic rocks are intruded by late Eocene granitoid bodies with high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonitic affinity which are interpreted as arc magmatism [2-4].

Outline of Manto-type copper deposits in Ira

The most important copper deposits in Iran located in the UDMA and the AMB. Copper deposits in the UDMA are mainly porphyry type which are associated with Cenozoic magmatism [5-7]. The manto-type copper deposits in Iran are distributed in the SaSZ (Kesht Mahaki deposit [8], UDMA (Kashkouieh and Veshnaveh [9]), Sabzevar subzone (Abgareh, Zangalou, Kimia, Tarannom, Nasim, Kalabri, Sharifabad, Dahanesiah, Pirmardan, Dochileh, Abbas Abad, Chah Moosa, Choghondar Sar and Bozorg mine deposits [10-12]) Lut block (Varzag deposit [13]) and AMB (e.g., Mari [14], Dohneh, Chizeh, Zaker, Golharoud, Platelou, Gheshlagh, Sorkhe Dizaj, Kordkand and Daveh Yataghi) (Figure 1). All of these deposits, except Cretaceous Kesht Mahaki deposit, formed within the Eocene volcanic and volcano-sedimentary rocks. There are many copper deposits in the AMB, mainly within the Tarom subzone which can be considered as manto-type deposits. These deposits mainly occurred within the Eocene basaltic and andesitic rocks of the Karaj Formation. Manto-type copper deposits in the Tarom area occurred in forms of vein-veinlets, open space filling and replacement within the basaltic and andesitic rocks. Some of these deposits such as Dohneh deposit has more similarity to the Michigan copper deposits but most of them may be classified as Manto type copper deposits. The main important ore minerals at the Michigan type deposit consist of native copper, native silver, cuprite, malachite and azureite. The chalcocite, chalcopyrite, pyrite, bornite, malachite, azurite, chalcocite and iron oxide minerals are the most important minerals in the Manto type copper deposits at the Tarom Subzone. The mineralization is accompanied by silicification, zeolitization, chloritization, epidotization and carbonatization which formed in form a replacement, vein-vein and open space filling in the host rocks. According to the field observation, mineralogy and alteration assemblage it may be state that these deposits occurred during the burial metamorphic process. In the other hands, the injection of ore-forming fluids into the fractures in the host rocks caused the precipitation of copper and silver minerals.

Figure 1: Distribution of Manto-type Cu deposits in the simplified structural map of Iran. For the Manto-type Cu deposits in the Tarom and Sabzevar subzones.


Conclusion

The Eocene volcanic and volcano-clastic sequences are the main host rocks for the Manto-type copper deposits in Iran. Although there are some Manto-type deposits in the SaSZ and the Lut block, but most of the Manto-type deposits occurred in the UDMA, AMB and the Sabzevar subzone. The Eocene magmatic pulse is a significant arc volcanic activity across Iran. Thus, the investigation of Eocen volcanic and volcano-clastic sequences along the UDMA, AMB, Sabzevar subzone, SaSz and the Lut block can be proposed for future exploration of Manto-type Cu deposits.

References

  1. Asiabanha A, Foden J (2012) Post-collisional transition from an extensional volcano sedimentary basin to a continental arc in the Alborz Ranges, N-Iran. Lithos 148: 98-111.
  2. Nabatian G, Ghaderi M, Neubauer F, Honarmand M, Lui X, et al. (2014) Petrogenesis of tarom high-potassic granitoids in the Alborz-Azarbaijan belt, Iran: Geochemical, U-Pb zircon and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic constraints. Lithos 184-187: 324-345.
  3. Nabatian G, Jiang SY, Honarmand M, Neubauer F (2016) Zircon U-Pb ages, geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotopic constraints on petrogenesis of the tarom-olya pluton, Alborz magmatic belt, NW Iran. Lithos 244: 43-58.
  4. Maghdour Mashhour R, Esmaeily D, Tabbakh Shabani AA, Chiaradia M, Latypov R (2015) Petrology and geochemistry of the Karaj Dam basement sill: Implications for geodynamic evolution of the Alborz magmatic belt. Chem Erde 75(2): 237-260.
  5. Shafiei B, Haschke M, Shahabpour J (2009) Recycling of orogenic arc crust triggers porphyry Cu mineralization in kerman cenozoic arc rocks, southeastern Iran. Mineralium Deposita 44: 265-283.
  6. Mirnejad H, Mathur R, Hassanzadeh J, Shafie B, Nourali S (2013) Linking Cu mineralization to host porphyry emplacement: Re-Os ages of molybdenites versus U-Pb ages of zircons and sulfur isotope compositions of pyrite and chalcopyrite from the IJU and Sarkuh porphyry deposits in southeast Iran. Economic Geology 108: 861-870.
  7. Richards JP, Sholeh A (2016) The tethyan tectonic history and Cu-Au metallogeny of Iran. In: Richards JP (Ed.), Tectonics and Metallogeny of the Tethyan Orogenic Belt, Society of Economic Geologists Special Publication 19: 193-212.
  8. Boveiri M, Rstad E, Kojima S, Rashidnejad N (2013) Volcanic red bed-type copper mineralization in the lower cretaceous volcano-sedimentary sequence of the Keshtmahaki deposit, southern Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone, Iran. New Yearbook for Mineralogy-Treatises (J Min Geochem) 190(2): 107-121.
  9. Abolipour M, Rastad E, Rashidnejad N (2015) Manto-type copper mineralization in pyrobitumen-bearing porphyritic andesite, Kashkouieh district of Rafsanjan, Dehaj-Sardoiye subzone. Journal of Geosciences 24(95): 123-144.
  10. Maghfouri S, Movahednia M (2015) Investigation of geology and mineralization of Abbas Abad copper deposit and camper with Manto-type deposit, 18th Symposium on Iranian Geosciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran.
  11. Salehi L, Rasa I, Alirezaei S, Kazemi Mehrnia A (2016) The Madan Bozorg, volcanic-hosted copper deposit, East Shahroud; An example of Manto type copper deposits in Iran. Journal of Geosciences 25(98): 93-104.
  12. Ebrahimi S, Arab Amiri A, Kamkar Rouhani A (2019) Geological and geophysical studies of sulfide copper mineralization in the Dochileh Area: An example of Manto‐type deposit in the Sabzevar Zone, Iran. Resource Geology 70(2): 125-140.
  13. Alizadeh V, Momenzadeh M, Emami HM (2013) Petrography, geochemistry, mineralogy, fluid inclusions and mineralization study of Varezg-Qayen copper deposit. Journal of Geosciences 22: 86.
  14. Maghfouri S, Hosseinzadeh MR, Moayyed M, Movahednia M, Choulet F (2016) Geology, mineralization and sulfur isotopes geochemistry of the Mari Cu (Ag) Manto-type deposit, northern Zanjan, Iran. Ore Geology Reviews 81: 10-22.

© 2021 Ghasem Nabatian. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.