Elena Belyaeva*
Institute of History of Material Culture, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia
*Corresponding author: Elena Belyaeva, Institute of History of Material Culture, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia
Submission: November 25, 2020Published: March 29, 2021
ISSN: 2577-1949 Volume4 Issue2
Until the beginning of this century the Early Paleolithic of the Caucasus region was represented by numerous Late Acheulian sites with flat and carefully flaked hand axes (second half of the Middle Pleistocene, i.e., after ~500 Kyr) [1] as well as the only much older Dmanisi site in South Georgia (Figure 1) yielding a typical Oldowan industry with primitive core-choppers (Figure 1) and flakes [2,3]. The Oldowan artifacts together with abundant paleontological and anthropological remains were found in the Early Pleistocene deposits dated to the interval of 1.85-1.76Myr that corresponds mainly to the Olduvai paleomagnetic subchron [3-5]. So, in the Caucasus there was a huge chronological gap between the Late Acheulian and the Oldowan stages of the Early Paleolithic occupation. However, over the past two decades the situation has changed dramatically, because several the sites of the Early Pleistocene ages, i.e., older than 0.8Myr, were discovered in different parts of the region (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Distribution of the oldest early paleolithic sites in the caucasus region. I - Oldowan site; II - Early Acheulian sites; III - Oldowan - Early Acheulian sites. A - handaxe (Rodniki 1); B - pick (Muhkai 1, layer 6); C - handaxe (Muradovo, layer 6); D - Dmanisi, Bed B.
One of the groups of such old Early Paleolithic sites is in the northern part of the volcanic
upland of the South Caucasus (Armenia), not far from the Dmanisi site (Figure 1). The key
site was revealed in the large Karakhach quarry just near to the slope of the Javakhetian
volcanic ridge fringing the Lori intermountain depression. The sediment section exposed in
the Karakhach quarry contains the Early Pleistocene deposits subdivided into three units.
Most artifacts were found in the lowermost Bed III (>8m) consisting of badly sorted gravels
with interbedded paleosols and ash lenses [6]. These layers deposited mainly by temporal
streams are overlapped by the multi-meter deposits of tephra, or tuff (Bed II) and slope
wash (Bed I). The U-Pb dating of tephra and paleomagnetic readings for the entire sediment
sequence showed that the artifact-bearing layers of Karakhach formed during the Olduvai
paleomagnetic subchron and somewhat later, in the interval of 1.85-1.77MYR [7]. Hence, the
Karakhach and Dmanisi sites existed in the same period of the Early Pleistocene.
The lithic collection of Karakhach (~3000 items) contains a
considerable number of various large tools (>10cm) inherent to the
Acheulian industries. The large tools of the Karakhach industry are
dominated by picks and choppers. There are also a few dozens of
crude hand axes and several large flakes, which are indicators of the
Acheulian. Both the archaic aspect and the Early Pleistocene age of
the industry allow to define it as the Early Acheulian. The knapping
products (cores and flakes) are rare, and most of both large and
small tools were made of natural slab-like pieces of local volcanic
rocks (rhyodacite, rhyolite). Of special interest are some unusual
tool types such as fan-shaped and sub-rectangular choppers,
elongated bar-shaped chisels, chisel-ended picks etc. [6,8].
Near the Karakhach quarry there is another site named
Muradovo where the lowermost part of the sediment section yielded
the Early Acheulian industry with the same slab-like blanks and
tool types including crude hand axes (Figure 1), picks, fan-shaped
and sub-rectangular choppers, elongated bar-shaped chisels, and
others. Moreover, these layers of Muradovo are also like the Bed III of
Karakhach in the deposit structure. Therefore, despite the absence
of absolute dates for the Early Acheulian layers of Muradovo, they
are most likely synchronous with those of Karakhach [7]. Both lithic
industries appear to belong to a single Early Acheuluan tradition
[6,8]. Additionally, in the east of the Lori depression there is the
Kurtan I site where a partly similar, but somewhat more developed
lithic industry was found in the paleosols attributed to the interval
1.5-0.5 Myr [7].
Judging by scarce palaeoecological evidence from Karakhach
(kinds of paleosols, composition of phytoliths) and more abundant
data from Dmanisi including the faunal assemblage and pollen
spectra, from the very beginning the Oldowan and Early Acheulian
toolmakers inhabited volcanic upland of the South Caucasus
under the conditions of subtropical climate and mostly savannalike
landscape with woody vegetation in the river valley and
mountain slopes [2,8-10]. Besides the Karakhach, Muradovo and
Kurtan I sites, several similar Early Acheulian tools were found in
several surface localities in the foothills of the Somkhetian ridge
flanking the Lori depression in the east as well in some localities
of the neighboring territories [1,8,11]. These finds may hint on a
more extensive distribution of the Early Paleolithic people in the
volcanic upland of the South Caucasus than it infers from a few sites
discovered in this area at present.
The other group of very old Early Paleolithic sites (Kermek,
Rodniki 1-4, Bogatyri) was discovered in the North-Western part
of the Caucasus region, in the Taman peninsula between the Black
and Azov Seas (Figure 1). The layers with abundant faunal remains
and lithic artifacts were revealed in the Early Pleistocene deposits
exposed in several localities of a high terrace extending along
the Azov Sea shore. Based on the established ages of the faunal
assemblages these sites may be attributed to the interval of 2.1-
1.0Myr [8,12,13]. The Early Paleolithic inhabitants of the Taman
sites fashioned tools on both flakes and slab-like fragments of the
local silicified dolomite. The oldest artifact-bearing layers of the
Kermek site (2.1-1.8Myr) yielded choppers, picks, and cleaver but
no hand axes [14]. Nevertheless, the presence of a set of large tools
as well as several large flakes suggest the Early Acheulian type of
the industry. Similar but more developed Early Acheulian industries
with rare small hand axes (Figure 1) were found in the sediment
sequences of Bogatyry and Rodniki 3-4 (1.5-1.2Myr) and in those
of Rodniki 1-2 (~1.0Myr). Hence, these Taman lithic industries may
reflect a long evolution of the local Early Acheulian tradition, which
has, however, some similarities with that of the Lori depression in
the South Caucasus.
Very old Early Paleolithic sites have been also revealed in
the North-Eastern Caucasus, namely in the mountainous area
of Daghestan (Figure 1). The multi-meter sediment sequence
excavated in the Ainikab and Muhkai 1-2 sites formed during a
huge interval of 2.3-0.8Myr estimated on the base of the ages of
the faunal assemblages as well as the paleomagnetic readings
[15,16]. The sequence corresponding to different stages of the
Early Pleistocene includes numerous artifact-bearing layers with
choppers, picks (Figure 1) and knapping products made of slablike
pieces of local chert. From the beginning of the research the
industry was generally defined as Oldowan because there were
no hand axes considered by many scholars as the hallmark of the
Acheulian [15]. Then, it was established that in the upper layers of
the sediment sequence dated to the end of the Early Pleistocene
(1.1-0.8Myr) the industry looks more developed and contains rare
proto-hand axes [16]. Recently new excavations of the upper layers
at Muhkai 1-2 yielded large flakes as well as certain tools fashioned
on the large flakes. Based on the emergence of this purely Acheulian
technology along with some other innovations, the investigators of
the sites concluded that at the end of the Early Pleistocene there
was a local transition from the Oldowan industry to the Early
Acheulian one [17]. However, the presence of large choppers and
picks in the older layers of the sites under consideration allow to
think that the Oldowan-Early Acheulian transition started there
much earlier [12]. It is noteworthy that some picks and choppers
from different layers of the Muhkai 1-2 sites have analogues in the
Lori and the Taman Early Acheulian industries described above. A
relative late appearance in the Daghestan sites of such Acheulian
components as large flakes and hand axes may be explained by bed
qualities of local chert, which is difficult to process and unfavorable
for the development of complex technologies.
Thus, now it is reliably established that in the Caucasus there
was no chronological break between the Oldowan and Acheulian
occupations. Both the Oldowan and Acheulian toolmakers already
inhabited the region not later than two million years ago. In this
period of the Early Pleistocene the Caucasus environments were
very favorable for settling the early humans and resembled the
natural conditions of their African homeland [8]. In addition,
various rocks spread over the Caucasus region could provide
the Early Paleolithic peoples with the abundant raw material for
manufacturing lithic industries. Since the Early Pleistocene sites
are in the different and remote parts of the Caucasus, it is obvious
that at that time the early humans were widely settled throughout
the region.
Currently, the earliest Acheulian industries of the Caucasus are
older than those in Africa (~1.76-1.77Myr [18]) and in the Near East (1.2-1.6 [19]) and demonstrate some features (slab-lake blanks
for tools, special tool types) that allow to assume the independent
origin of the Acheulian in the region. Then, similarities between the
Early Acheulian industries of the South and North Caucasus may
suggest their common roots. It means that in the Caucasus there
may be found somewhat older sites with more primitive industries,
which were brought to the region by the true first settlers. This
does not concern the Dmanisi site because it is synchronous to the
earliest Acheulian sites or even younger. As it has been shown, the
complete formation of the Acheulian technology and tool types in
different parts of the Caucasus took place at different times. In the
areas with quite suitable raw material such as the Lori depression
(South Caucasus) and Taman peninsula the early humans have
mastered the Acheulian industries around 1.8Myr, whereas at
Daghestan they have fully learned all these complex technologies
much later, only at the end of the Early Pleistocene [20,21].
The paper has been prepared within the framework of the
FCR SAS program (state assignment №0184-2019-0001) on the
topic “The oldest inhabitants of Russia and adjacent countries:
ways and time of dispersals, evolution of culture and communities,
adaptation to natural environments”.
© 2021 Elena Belyaeva. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.