Crimson Publishers Publish With Us Reprints e-Books Video articles

Full Text

Archaeology & Anthropology:Open Access

Bundelkhand and Dharwar Cratons (Indian Shield): Comparison of Crustal Evolution in Archean Time

Slabunov AI1 and Vinod K Singh2*

1 Institute of Geology, Karelian Research Centre, Russia

2 Department of Geology, Bundelkhand University, India

*Corresponding author: Vinod K Singh, Department of Geology, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, India

Submission: July 02, 2018;Published: September 25, 2018

DOI: 10.31031/AAOA.2018.03.000556

ISSN: 2577-1949
Volume3 Issue2

Abstract

Comparison of the Meso-Neoarchean crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand, Western and Eastern Dharwar cratons shows that geodynamic mechanisms, similar to modern plate-tectonic and mantle-plume mechanisms, were active in that period. Each of the cratons displays its own crust formation pattern. It seems that in Archean time the Bundelkhand craton and the Western and Eastern Dharwar cratons were the various parts of the Kenorland Supercontinent, rather than one block.

Keywords: Archean; Crustal evolution; Geodynamics; Indian shield; Bundelkhand craton; Western Dharwar craton; Eastern dharwar craton

Introduction

Archean rocks in the Indian Shield (Figure 1) [1] are exposed in the Bundelkhand and Aravalli cratons to the north and in the Dharwar (Western and Eastern), Singhbum and Bastar cratons to the south respectively to the E-W trending Central Indian tectonic zone [1,2]. The Western and Eastern Dharwar cratons are one of the well-known in the world [1,3-6] and can use as standard. TTG, supracrustal (greenstone and schist), sanukitoid and other typical Archean complexes were identified in the Bundelkhand craton, based on the data obtained in the past few years [7-13]. The goal of the present study is to correlate the crustal evolution of the above two cratons.

Figure 1:Main tectonic division of Indian shield [1].


Geology and Crustal Evolution of the Bundelkhand Craton

Figure 2:Geological maps of the Bundelkhand craton [8-10].

Figure 2b: Western Dharwar and Eastern Dharwar cratons [5,6].


The Bundelkhand craton consists of an Archean TTGgneisses, granitoids (K-granites, diorites, sanukitoids), greenstone and schist/metasedimentary complexes and mafic-ultramafic layered intrusion, (Figure 2a) [9,10,13-18] and Paleoproterozoic mafic dykes, and huge quartz viens [19,20]. Granite-greenstone terrains form a basement for the deposition of Paleoproterozoic sedimentary rocks (Gwalior basin in the northwestern part of craton and Bijawar basin in the southern to southeastern part of the craton). The Paleoproterozoic doleritic dykes exhibit an NNWSSE to NW-SE trend and are generally regarded as undeformed basic magmatic activity in the craton [19,21]. Highly jointed Paleoproterozoic (1.9-1.8Ga) quartz veins generally display a NESW trend and indicate the last endogenic activity [20,22]. Meso- to Neoproterozoic (Vindhyan Supergroup) rocks was also deposited to the southeast, south, southwest and western part of the craton (Figure 1 & 2a) [1,19].

The oldest TTG-gneissic rocks are dated at 3.6-3.2Ga in the craton [7,8,23,24]. The TTG-gneisses generally strike ESE-WNW. There are Central and the Southern Bundelkhand supracrustal (greenstone and schist) complexes in the craton [9,10,14,17]. The Central Bundelkhand Greenstone Complex forms the Babina and Mauranipur Greenstone Belts (GBs) generally show an E-W linear trend (Figure 2a). This complex consists of an early (Mesoarchean) assemblage, which contains basic-ultrabasic, felsic volcanics (2810±13Ma) and BIF rocks, and a late (ca 2.54Ga-Neoarchean) assemblage composed of felsic volcanic rocks. The Babina GB contains three stratotectonic associations:

1. A basalt-ultramafic association (with preserved small lens-shaped schistose-structured bodies).

2. An iron formation association (BIF).

3. A dacite-rhyolite association (felsic volcanics).

The first two associations constitute an early assemblage and the third one a late assemblage. The boundaries between the assemblages extend as mélanges along the tectonic contact. The high-P metamorphism (ca 18-20kbar, 620-640 ˚C) reveal in northern part of Babina belt during 2780±60Ma [25]. At the northern and southern margins of the Central Bundelkhand Greenstone Complex, a series of Neoarchean (2.54-2.56Ga) sanukitoid massifs were revealed [18]. Towards the southern flank of the Babina greenstone belt, at contact zone with TTG granitoids, a metamorphic process dated from monazite at 2733±30Ma, were active [25]. Furthermore, late metamorphic events, dated at ca. 2.5Ga (2467±24Ma), occurred in this belt. Late- to post-kinematic Neoarchean (2.53-2.51Ga) granites are most common in the craton [13] and form during accretions after TTG partial melting.

The Southern Bundelkhand schist/metasedimentary complex formed the Girar belt (Figure 2b). This schist belt consists of two groups of rocks [8]: quartzite, BIFs and dolomitic marble and chlorite schist lenses near the quartzite/BIF boundary. U-Pb zircon data from Girar belt quartzites give an older age of 3.43Ga and a younger age of 3.25Ga, suggesting that 3.25Ga is the minimum age of the source for the sediments [17]. The foliated rocks of the Girar metasedimentary belt are covered by gently dipping undeformed Paleoproterozoic (ca 1800Ma) rocks of the Bijawar Group. This is indirect evidence for older, most probably Archean, quartzite and BIF rocks of the Girar belt. The field relations of Ikauna Archean peridotite-gabbro-diorite layered intrusive rocks, the pink granite and lesser TTG, which occur north of the Girar metasedimentary belt, are demarcated by a tectonic boundary.

Available data from supracrustal rocks of Bundelkhand craton are consistent enough to propose that the Central Bundelkhand Greenstone Complex is a collage of two assemblages. The early assemblage formed in the Mesoarchean, as indicated by the age of felsic volcanics (2810±13Ma) in Mauranipur GB. The formation of the basic-ultrabasic constituent of this assemblage, which comprises boninite-like varieties [26], is attributed to subduction processes in the oceanic island-arc system (Figure 3). This volcanism is followed by island-arc dacitic-rhyolitic volcanism. The 2810Ma felsic volcanic are contaminated by old crustal matter, as they contain the 3.2Ga xenogenic zircons. This evidence suggests the emergence of an old crust fragment at the base of the island-arc. This could be a microcontinent similar in composition to 3.6-3.2Ga TTG complexes in the northern part of the Bundelkhand craton [7,8,24], which approached the subduction zone and became part of a supra subduction zone.

Figure 3:The scheme of correlation of Archean geodynamic processes in the Bundelkhand (BuC), Western Dharwar (WDC), Earstern Dharwar (EDC) cratons and SaB - Satpura Mobile Belt.


BIFs developed in the second-stage island-arc system in the basins. As BIFs of the Mauranipur belt formed in back-arc basin whereas BIFs of the Babina belt form in a fore-arc basin. The Archean (~2780±60Ma) eclogite facies metamorphism and island-arc dacitic-rhyolitic volcanism (~2810±13Ma) have relatives (within analytical uncertainty) similar age. This fact is the important argument in favour of subductional nature of an early assemblage of Central Bundelkhand Greenstone Complex [12]. At about 2.7Ga the arc complex accreted to the southern continental block (Figure 3). This event is marked by the formation of thrust faults and 2687±17Ma metamorphic processes, as indication in the Mauranipur belt [11] and 2730±33Ma processes in the Babina belt [25]. The youngest (2669.3±7.4Ma) TTG formed here in this time too [13] and similar age (2684±8Ma) TTG rocks are recognize in Western Dharwar craton [27].

Important events in the crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand craton took place in the Neoarchean (Figure 3), when the southern continental block was affected by a mantle plume, which was responsible for the formation of a sedimentary basin, in which the quartzites and BIFs of the South Bundelkhand schist (metasedimentary) complex were formed [10,17]. A new stage in the subduction processes began at 2.56-2.54Ga. A spreading zone seems to have existed in the ocean which separated these blocks. However, the rate of its opening was lower than the rate of subduction at periphery. At the southern margin of the northern block (it is Babina belt in the modern coordinate system) subduction occurred in an active continental margin regime, as indicated by Neoarchean (2542Ma) [9], felsic volcanics of the Babina belt and sanukitoid massif similar in age (2560-2559Ma) [18]. At the northern flank of the southern continental block this stage is marked by Neoarchean (2557Ma) dacites of Mauranipur belt [11] and a sanukitoid massif [18]. The closure of the ocean and an accretion stage in the evolution of the greenstone took place at about 2.53Ga, after the youngest 2542Ma volcanics and prior to the formation of the earliest post-kinematic granites -2531Ma [13]. At this stage its Meso- and Neoarchean constituents are combined to form one greenstone complex. The melting of large volumes of granitoids in the period 2.53-2.51Ga is associated with post-accretionary processes in the crust. The craton is stabilized at around 2.5Ga.

Geology and Crustal Evolution of the Western and Eastern Dharwar Craton

The Dharwar craton has been divided lately into two cratons: Western and Eastern, based on their evolution patterns and crustal structures. Each of them is 3-4 times the size of the Bundelkhand craton (Figure 2). The Western Dharwar craton consists of Paleoarchean (3.36 (3.58)-3.2) TTG gneises (Peninsular gneisses), three generations of greenstone complexes (Sargur, Bababudan and Chitradurga Groups) and several granitoid massifs [4,6]. The Sargur greenstone belt is composed of mafic-ultamafic rocks (metabasalts, komatiites and their intrusive conglomerates and meta anorthosites), which often predominate, and metasediments (kyanite/sillimanite-staurolite-biotite gneisses, quartzites, BIF, local marble, calc-silicate rocks, bedded barite); felsic volcanic are scarce. The age of the complex is estimated at 3.1-3.3Ga, based on the Sm-Nd whole-rock isochron age of komatiites of 3352±110 Ma [28] and the U-Pb age of zircon from felsic volcanics of 3298±7Ma [29]. It forms small greenstone belts, both belts dominated by mafics-ultramafics (e.g. Ghatti Hosahalli, Krishnarajapet and Nagamangala) and those with abundant sediments (e.g. Sargur and Hole Narasipura). The Sargur greenstone complex was formed presumably in both riftrelated structures on an early continental crust (3.58-3.23Ga zircons in quartzites have been found, suggesting the existence of an older crust) and an oceanic plateau-type setting. The occurrence of 3.2Ga TTGs in the region suggests subduction processes of that age. A second generation of greenstone complexes in the Western Dharwar craton is the Meso-Neoarchean Bababudan Group at the base of the Dharwar Supergroup in Bababudan, Chitradurga schist belts. The base of the Bababudan Group sequence consists of cross-bedded quartz conglomerates with ripple marks (Kalasapura Formation). These sediments rest with angular unconformity on Peninsular gneisses Sargur Group rocks. In addition to quartz conglomerates, the Sargur Group comprises phyllites and BIF. Mafic (metaba salts and gabbroic rocks) and ultramafic bodies seem to occur among them as sills. Felsic volcanics, occurring as part of the Santaveri Formation, are scarce. The mafics-ultramafics are dated at 2.9-2.85Ga (Sm-Nd whole rock isochron ages are 2911±49 and 2848±70Ma, Kumar et al., 1996). The formation of the Bababudan greenstone complex was associated with plume activity and took place in an intracontinental basin.

A third greenstone/schist complex of the craton corresponds with the Chitradurga Group of the Dharwar Supergroup, which makes up the largest Shimoga and Chitradurga groups. This Group consists dominantly of sediments (quartz and polymictic conglomerates containing TTG and Bababudan Group rock fragments, chert-phyllite, manganese and iron formation and stromatolitic carbonates) with pillow basalt and lesser felsic volcanic intercalations. The complex is dated at 2.75-2.58Ga: the Sm-Nd whole rock isochron age is 2747±15, [30]; the U-Pb age of zircon from the felsic volcanic is 2677±2 to 2576±20 [6]. The sedimentation basin of the Chitradurga Group [31] seems to have been controlled by mantle plume activity.

The Eastern Dharwar craton is separated from the Western Dharwar craton by a large fault, the Chitradurga shear zone, and differs from the latter in deep structure (a thinner earth crust) [32] and the compositions and ages of Archean granitoid and greenstone complexes [33,34]. The craton consists dominantly of commonly migmatized TTG granitoids, but, in contrast to the Eastern Dharwar craton, they are dominated by 2.7-2.55Ga rocks with minor fragments of 3.0-3.38Ga crust [6]. Moreover, the contribution of old matter to granitoid composition decreases markedly (Nd TDM up to 2.8-3.0Ga in the eastern part [35], but 2.56-2.5Ga juvenile (εNd=+3.3) calc-alkaline to potassic granitoids are widespread here. Occurring in the western part of the craton is the 2.51-2.53Ga sanukitoid-like Close pet Granite batholiths, which cross-cuts the entire craton. The greenstone belts of the Eastern Dharwar craton are small narrow N-S and NW-SE trending linear structures, e.g. Kolar, Hutti, Kushtagi etc.). They consist mainly of metabasalts (often pillowed) associated with komatiites and BIF; felsic volcanics, associated with greywacke and polymictic conglomerates (Kolar GB), are common; metasediments, occurring as schists, are less common. An early association (beginning probably with 2.75, but mainly at ca. 2.7Ga) of basalts and komatiites was formed in an oceanic setting under the influence of plumes, i.е. oceanic plateaus), but this stage was also terminated by subduction processes (Sangur GB). However, the main episode in the subduction processes, which gave rise to a continental crust, occurred at 2.58-2.52Ga, when felsic volcanics and various granitoids (including sanukitoids) originated. Ca 2.5Ga granulite-facies metamorphism, widespread in the southern part of the Eastern and Western Dharwar cratons, was associated with accretion-collision processes.

Conclusion

Western Dharwar, Eastern Dharwar, and Bundelkhand cratons of the Indian Shield compared each other which reveal its own structural and evolutional characteristics. First of all, it should be noted that the Bundelkhand craton is much smaller than the Western and Eastern Dharwar cratons. However, it comprises TTG, greenstone/schist and sanukitoid complexes most typical of Archean cratons. The old cores of all the cratons commonly consist of Paleoarchean TTG. The oldest (3.6-3.2Ga) TTG occur in the central Bundelkhand craton, but they seem to have been more common. The Western Dharwar craton is dominated by 3.36-3.2Ga TTG, but they probably comprised even older (up to 3.58Ga) constituents, which have survived only as zircons in sedimentary rocks. It should also be noted that the formation of the Paleoarchean (3.3-3.2Ga) Sargur greenstone complex is similar in age to TTG. The Eastern Dharwar craton displays a somewhat different distribution and age of old TTG: fragments of 3.3-3.0Ga TTG occur here as part of migmatizedgneises in the western part of the craton, while its eastern portion consists of juvenile Neoarchean (2.7-2.55Ga) granitoids, including TTG. The Meso-Neoarchean (2.9-2.6Ga) evolution of the Western Dharwar craton was affected by mantle plumes. As a result, intraplate sedimentary basins, exhibiting bimodal magmatism, were derived. The intrusion of 2.61Ga potassium-granites stabilized the craton.

The processes occurring in the Eastern Dharwar craton were entirely different: the formation of a juvenile continental crust took place here mainly in Neoarchean time, beginning at 2.75- 2.7Ga, but dominantly at 2.58-2.54 (2.51)Ga. The leading role was played by subduction processes, which terminated by the accretion of the newly-formed crust to the Western Dharwar craton, which had stabilized earlier. The crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand craton differs substantially from those described above. One of the essential differences is that in Mesoarchean time (ca. 2.81Ga) a new continental crust was formed during subduction here and in the Karelian craton [36,37], but it was not transformed by plumes as in the Western Dharwar craton. The Neoarchean evolution of the central portion of the Bundelkhand craton differed from that of the southern portion of Bundelkhand craton.

The former was an area where the ocean, dividing the northern and southern terrains, was closed. Subduction processes were active here at ca.2.7Ga but were most vigorous at 2.56-2.54Ga and were terminated by accretion-collision events and the formation of 2.53-2.5Ga potassium-granites. Crust formation in the central Bundelkhand craton is similar in time and geodynamic pattern with the Eastern Dharwar craton, but there are some essential differences. Subduction processes in the Eastern Dharwar craton occurred in an island-arc regime and those in the Bundelkhand craton in an active continent margin regime. The earth crust of the southern Bundelkhand craton, where presumably Neoarchean layered intrusions and a sedimentary basin (Girar greenstone/ schist belt) were revealed, which was formed in a different manner. The effect of a mantle plume is felt here and in the Western Dharwar craton.

In the late Neoarchean (ca. 2.5Ga) the Western and Eastern Dharwar cratons were involved as one structure in an accretioncollision process, which gave rise to southern Dharwar craton granulites. Thus, correlation of the Meso-Neoarchean crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand, Western and Eastern Dharwar cratons shows that geodynamic mechanisms, similar to modern plate-tectonic and mantle-plume mechanisms, were active in that period. Each of the cratons displays its own crust formation pattern. It seems that in Archean time the Bundelkhand craton and the Western and Eastern Dharwar cratons were the various parts of the Kenorland Supercontinent, rather than one block [38,39].

Acknowledgement

The work was supported by DST-RFBR (INT/RUS/RFBR/P-279 and RFBR-17-55-45005 IND) grants. This work is also supporting under MOU between Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, India and Institute of Geology, Karelian Research Centre, RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia.

References

  1. Ramakrishnan M, Vaidyanadhan R (2010) Geology of India. Geological Society of India, India, 1: 556.
  2. Naqvi SM, Rogers JJW (1987) Precambrian geology of India: Oxford monographs on geology and geophysics, Oxford University, UDA, p. 223.
  3. Chadwick B, Vasudev VN, Hegde GV (2000) The Dharwar craton, southern India, interpreted as the result of late Archaean oblique convergence. Precambrian Research 99(1-2): 91-101.
  4. Radhakrishna BP, Ramakrishnan M (1990) Archaean Greenstone Belts of South India. Geological Society of India, India, p. 497.
  5. Jayananda M, Chardon D, Peucat JJ, Tushipokla, Fanning CM (2015) Paleo to Mesoarchean TTG accretion and continental growth in the western Dharwar craton, Southern India: Constraints from SHRIMP U-Pb zircon geochronology, whole-rock geochemistry and Nd-Sr isotopes. Precambrian Research 268: 295-322.
  6. Jayananda M, Peucat JJ, Chardon D, Krishna B, Fanning CM, et al. (2013) Neoarchean greenstone volcanism and continental growth, Dharwar craton, southern India: Constraints from SIMS U-Pb zircon geochronology and Nd isotopes. Precamb Res 227: 55-76.
  7. Kaur P, Zeh A, Chaudhri N (2014) Characterisation and U-Pb-Hf isotope record of the 3.55Ga felsic crust from the Bundelkhand Craton, northern India. Precambica Research 255(1): 236-244.
  8. Saha L, Frei D, Gerdes A, Pati JK, Sarkar S, et al. (2016) Crustal geodynamics from the Archaean Bundelkhand Craton, India: constraints from zircon U-Pb-Hf isotope studies. Geological Magazine 153(1): 79- 192.
  9. Singh VK, Slabunov A (2015) The Central Bundelkhand Archaean greenstone complex, Bundelkhand Craton, Central India: geology, composition, and geochronology of supracrustal rocks. International Geology Review 57(11-12): 1349-1364.
  10. Singh VK, Slabunov A (2016) Two types of Archaean supracrustal belts in the Bundelkhand Craton, India: geology, geochemistry, age and implication for craton crustal evolution. Journal of the Geological Society of India 88(5): 539-548.
  11. Slabunov A, Singh VK (2017) Central Bundelkhand greenstone complex of the Bundelkhand Craton, India: New geochronological data, a geodynamic setting and the position of the craton in the Kenorland Supercontinent structure. In: Slabunov AI, Svetov SA, Baltibaev ShK (Eds.), Early Precambrian vs Modern Geodynamics. Extended Abstracts and Field Trips Guide. Kar RC RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia, pp. 239-241.
  12. Slabunov АI, Singh VK, Svetov SA (2018a) Crustal evolution of Bundelkhand craton (Indian Shield) and Archean geodynamic processes. Problems in the tectonics and geodynamics of the earth crust and the mantle. Proceedings of the 1st Tectonic Meeting, Moscow, Russia, 2: 193- 196.
  13. Verma SK, Verma SP, Oliveira EP, Singh VK, More JA (2016) LA-SFICP- MS zircon U-Pb geochronology of granitic rocks from the central Bundelkhand greenstone complex, Bundelkhand craton, India. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 118: 125-137.
  14. Singh VK, Slabunov A (2013) The Greenstone belts of the Bundelkhand craton, Central India: new geochronological data and geodynamic setting. In: Singh VK, Chandra R (Eds.), International Association for Gondwana Research Conference Series, 3rd International conference Precambrian Continental Growth and Tectonism, Jhansi, India, pp. 170- 171.
  15. Singh VK, Slabunov A (2015) Geochemical characteristics of banded iron formation and metavolcanics from babina greenstone belt of the Bundelkh-and Craton, Central India. Journal of Economic Geology and Georesource Management 10: 63-74.
  16. Slabunov A, Egorova S, Singh VK, Svetov S, Kumar S (2018) Archean mafic-ultramafic Ikauna layered intrusion, Bundelkhand craton, India: petrography and geochemistry. In: Singh VK (Ed.), Earth Crust Evolution: from Precambrian to Recent, India.
  17. Slabunov A, Singh VK, Joshi KB, Li X (2017) Paleoarchean zircons from quartzite of South Bundelkhand Supracrustal Complex: origin and implications for crustal evolution in Bundelkhand Craton, Central India. Current Science 112: 794-801.
  18. Joshi KB, Bhattacharjee J, Rai G, Halla J, Kurhilla M, et al. (2017) The diversification of granitoids and plate tectonic implications at the Archaean-Proterozoic boundary in the Bundelkhand Craton, Central India. In: Halla J, Whitehouse MJ, Ahmad T, Bagai Z (Eds.), Crust-mantle interactions and granitoid diversification: Insights from archaean cratons. Geological Society, Special Publications, London, USA, 449: 123- 157.
  19. Basu AK (1986) Geology of parts of Bundelkhand granite massif. Central India Rec Geol Surv 117: 61-124.
  20. Slabunov AI, Singh VK, Shchiptsov VV, Lepekhina EN, Kevlich VI (2017b) A new Paleoproterozoic (1.9-1.8Ga) event in the crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand Craton, India: the results of (SHRIMP) Dating of zircons from giant quartz veins. In: Slabunov AI, Svetov SA, Baltibaev ShK (Eds.), Early Precambrian vs Modern Geodynamics. Extended Abstracts and Field Trips Guide. KarRC RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia, pp. 239-241.
  21. Pradhan VR, Meert JG, Pandit MK, Kamenov G, Ali Mondal E (2012) Paleomagnetic and geochronological studies of the mafic dyke swarms of Bundelkhand craton, central India: Implications for the tectonic evolution and paleogeographic reconstructions. Precamb Res 198-199: 51-76.
  22. Pati JK, Patel SC, Pruseth KL, Malviya VP, Arima M, et al. (2007) Geology and geochemistry of giant quartz veins from the Bundelkhand Craton, central India and their implications. Journal of Earth System Science 116: 497-510.
  23. Kaur P, Zeh A, Chaudhri N, Eliyas N (2016) Unravelling the record of Archaean crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand Craton, northern India using U-Pb zircon-monazite ages, Lu-Hf isotope systematics, and wholerock geochemistry of granitoids. Precambrian Research 281: 384-413.
  24. Mondal MEA, Goswami JN, Deomurari MP, Sharma KK (2002) Ion microprobe 207Pb/206Pb ages of zircon from the Bundelkhand massif, northern India: implication for crustal evolution of Bundelkhand - Aravalli protocontinent. Precambrian Research 117(1-2): 85-100.
  25. Saha L, Pant NC, Pati JK, Berndt J, Bhattacharya A, et al. (2011) Neoarchean high-pressure marg arite-phengitic muscovite-chlorite corona mantled corundum in quartz-free high-Mg, Al phlogopite-chlorite schists from the Bundelkhand craton, North central India. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 161(4): 511-530.
  26. Malviya VP, Arima M, Pati JK, Kaneko Y (2006) Petrology and geochemistry of metamorphosed basaltic pillow lava and basaltic komatiite in the Mauranipur area: subduction related volcanism in the Archean Bundelkhand craton, Central India. Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences 101(4): 199-217.
  27. Dey S, Halla J, Kurhila M, Nandy J, Heilimo E, et al. (2016) Geochronology of Neoarchaean granitoids of the NW eastern Dharwar craton: implications for crust formation In: Halla J, Whitehouse MJ, Ahmad T, Bagai Z (Eds.), Crust-mantle interactions and granitoid diversification: Insights from archaean cratons. Geological Society, Special Publications, London, USA.
  28. Jayananda M, Kano T, Peucat JJ, Channabasappa S (2008) 3.35Ga komatiite volcanism in the western Dharwar craton, southern India: constraints from Nd isotopes and whole rock geochemistry. Precambrian Research 162(1-2): 160-179.
  29. Peucat JJ, Bouhallier H, Fanning CM, Jayananda M (1995) Age of the Holenarsipur greenstone belt, relationships with the surrounding gneisses (Karnataka, South India). Journal of Geology 103(6): 701-710.
  30. Kumar A, Bhaskar Rao YJ, Sivaraman TV, Gopalan K (1996) Sm-Nd ages of Archaean metavolcanic of the Dharwar craton, South India. Precambrian Research 80(3-4): 206-215.
  31. Hokada T, Horie K, Satish KM, Ueno Y, Nasheeth A, et al. (2013) An appraisal of Archaean supracrustal sequences in Chitradurga schis belt, Western Dharwar Craton, Southern India. Precambrian Research 227: 99-119.
  32. Gupta S, Rai SS, Prakasam KS, Srinagesh D, Bansal BK, et al. (2003) The nature of the crust in southern India: Implications for Precambrian crustal evolution. Geophysical Research Letters 30(8): 419.
  33. Ram Mohan M, Piercey SJ, Kamber BS, Sarma DS (2013) Subduction related tectonic evolution of the Neoarchean eastern Dharwar Craton, southern India: New geochemical and isotopic constraints. Precambiran Research 227: 204-226.
  34. Yang QY, Santosh M (2015) Zircon U-Pb geochronology and Lu-Hf isotopes from the Kolar greenstone belt, Dharwar Craton, India: Implications for crustal evolution in an ocean-trench-continent transect. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 113(2): 797-811.
  35. Dey S (2013) Evolution of Archaean crust in the Dharwar craton: The Nd isotope record. Precambrian Research 227: 227-246.
  36. Slabunov AI, Lobach Zhuchenko SB, Bibikova EV, Sorjonen WP, Balagansky VV, et al. (2006) The Archean nucleus of the Fennoscandian (Baltic) Shield. In: Gee DG, Stephenson RA (Eds.), European Lithosphere Dynamics, Geological Society, London, 32: 627-644.
  37. Slabunov AI, Singh VK (2011) Archaean crustal evolution of the Fennoscandian and Bundelkhand craton: prospective. In: Singh VK, Chandra R (Eds.), Precambrian Continental Growth and Tectonism, Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference, India, pp. 3-12.
  38. Lubnina NV, Slabunov AI (2017) The Karelian craton in the structure of the Kenorland supercontinent in the Neoarchean: New paleomagnetic and isotope geochronology data on granulites of the Onega complex. Moscow University Geology Bulletin 72(6): 377-390.
  39. Slabunov AI, Guo J, Balagansky VV, Lubnina NV, Zhang L (2017) Early Precambrian Crustal evolution of the Belomorian and Trans-North China orogens and supercontinents reconstruction. Geodynamics and Tectonophysics 8: 569-572.

© 2018 Vinod K Singh. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.

About Crimson

We at Crimson Publishing are a group of people with a combined passion for science and research, who wants to bring to the world a unified platform where all scientific know-how is available read more...

Leave a comment

Contact Info

  • Crimson Publishers, LLC
  • 555 Madison Avenue, 5th floor
  •     New York, NY 10022, USA
  • +1 (929) 600-8049
  • +1 (929) 447-1137
  • info@crimsonpublishers.com
  • www.crimsonpublishers.com