Subramanian ss*
*Corresponding author: Subramanian SS, Department of Orthopedics’, Bharath University, Biher, Chennai
Submission: July 25, 2017; Published: August 21, 2017
ISSN : 2576-8816Volume1 Issue1
Low back pain is currently the number one cause of disability in the world affects 1/5 of the global population [1] and evidence shows the burden of low back pain increases from the sixth decade [2]. Low back pain in older adults is more disabling is associated with poor prognosis [3] and leads to a reduction in over all function and independence [4] low back pain can be classified based on duration of symptoms as acute (Up to 6 weeks) based on European guidelines [5] in the first three months during this period [6,7].
Low back pain is a common, costly medical condition and a major cause of pain, disability and social cost [8]. Sciatica is characterized by radiating pain in an area of the leg typically served by one nerve not in the lumbar or sacral spine and the most common cause is a herniated disc with an estimated annual incidence of sciatica in western countries 5 cases per 100 adults [9] lumbar spine disorders rank fifth among disease categories in the cost of hospital care and account for higher costs resulting from absenteeism from work and disability than any other category [10].
Variation and management of back pain is not surprising, as rates of hospitalization and surgery for low back pain vary widely by geographic region [11]. Given the frequency of the problem, the variation in its evaluation and treatment and its generally good prognosis, improving the efficiency of care for patients with low back pain is more needed [12]. This original study where the subject with low back pain and advised to undergo surgery was treated conservatively with specific exercises therapy outcome with the clinical prognosis and functional activities are evaluated and analyzed with evidence.
Background information
Mr. XXX, 72 years , gives a past medical H/O Non DM/ Non HT, mesomorph, retired as an executive with sedentary life style C/O Low back pain of one month duration with numbness in the feet and difficulty in walking, was advised for lumbar discectomy by Neurosurgeon, but is getting treated conservatively with exercises since 10/05/17.
O/E
i. Exagrated lumbar lord sis with obliterated cervical lord sis.
ii. Bilateral Hamstring, TendoAchilles tightness.
iii. SLR 60 degree increases posterior thigh pain (left) and lower lumbar region
iv. Motor power left EHL 2/5, Dorsiflexors 2/5,hip abductors, extensors, knee extensors 3/5
v. Vistas medial is lag was present on (Left)
vi. Tenderness at LS region (Lumbosacral)
vii. Parenthetic sensation of the feet, Toes, Great toe-drop, with dorsiflexors weakness(left), and intrinsic foot muscle sluggish but preserved arches of foot
viii. Ambulant with antalgic, scarpering gait but unaided
ix. Pain over lower lumbar and radiating up to posterior thigh and heal
x. BMI-30.55kg/m2
Diagnosis
NMRI reveals lumbar spondylosis with multilevel degenerative changes mainly at L4, L5 and L5-S1 level.
Treatment
A. Core strengthening Number of sessions: 10
B. PNF Techniques Frequency: Twice Weekly
C. Home programmed was explained and subject was continuing from day one of therapy
D. Duration: 25-30 minutes
Critical appraisal of his clinical prognosis
A. Reduction in the intensity of pain with each session
B. Ambulant unaided with an improved gait for 30 minutes, left EHL (Extensor Hallucis Longus), Toes, Ankle DF (Dorsi Flexors), Motor Power 3+/5
C. Improved physical activities and daily functioning
D. Reduction in obesity 30.55/m2kg to 28kg/m2
E. However further follow up is required on sustenance of the prognosis, where the subject was strictly advised to continue therapy with author with once a week session, regular continuous walking for 30 minutes daily and a set of home exercises.
Based on further evaluation frequency of therapy to be tampered with Obesity has decreased statistically significant and Oswestry disability scale has shown highly significant with statistical analysis as shown in the Table 1.
Table 1: Table of results on Pre and Post BMI, WC and Oswestry Disability Index.
X- Significant
XX - Highly Significant
Note
SD-standard deviation, SE-Standard Error, P-Level of significance, BMI- Body Mass Index, WC-Waist Circumference, Oswestry Disability Index-Subjective Rating Scale on 10 items related to low back physical functioning on a 5 point scale.
Inferring from the results table the following scientific question arises and getting answered with evidence as below:
A. Can sciatica be treated with exercises? Wilco et al. [13] have recorded in a study among 141 subjects with sciatica compared conservatively treated with those who underwent micro discectomy in a one year follow up with similar recovery from sciatica. In the United States and Netherlands, the rates of surgery are relatively high, with the recommendations that if the symptoms do not improve after 6 weeks of conservative treatment options for surgery should be considered [14]. With an improved motor power of ankle and foot as stated in the clinical prognosis column, this subjects need to undergo surgery was avoided a major outcome of this study.
B. Which form of exercise to be prescribed?
C. How much a physical functional activity improves with 10 sessions (5 Weeks) of specific therapy?
Core consist of the abdominal region, hips and back including deep muscles along spine, these muscles work with legs and arms to move body in different directions while maintaining control of position and movement [15]. Studies have shown that core muscles aid in functional activities [16] and there is a clear relationship between trunk muscle activity and lower extremity movement [17]. Core strength training among elderly subjects in a 6 week study among 48 subjects with the age group of 55-70 years, thrice a week has recorded greater improvement in functional mobility [18]. A meta analysis has concluded that core strength training can increase strength by an average of 30% and balance and functional performance by 23% [19]. Gatti et al. [20] have recorded that core training can reduce disability and low back pain patients. More over the effectiveness of core training and triunes balance exercise is more easily perceived by patients than that of pain reduction methods [21].
Does obesity influences lumbar spondylosis?
Obesity is associated with musculoskeletal disorders and lows physical functioning performance [22]. Strong evidence suggests regular physical activity decreases the risk for obesity [23]. Due to progressive age decline in stature, using BMI classify may overestimate adiposity in the elderly [24] also BMI cannot make a discrepancy between fat and muscle mass [25], henceother parameters such as WC could be the choice of measurement [26]. Obesity influencing conservative and surgical lumbar spinal conditions in a meta analysis [27]. This study subject with marked reduction in obesity (P<.05) has benefited from core strengthening exercises with which he was treated during this 10 session using Physioball.
Does core exercises are beneficial at geriatric subject with low back ache?
Resistance training and ability training among 98 elderly subjects with low back ache had reduced their symptoms and improved quality of life [28], compared with typical resistance training, core strength training is easier for low back pain to learn, although it is challenging [20] and patient can practice as home exercises, adds further motivation [29]. Several studies have shown typical resistance training can easily injury low back patients [20]. Ageing is associated with physical in activity, low energy intake and loss of skeletal mass [30]. Low relative skeletal muscle mass in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability [31]. Exercise interventions aimed at improving muscle strength have been identified as a key strategy for reducing fragility and maintaining functions in old age [32], and with marked reduction in pain improved physical functioning as indicated with Oswestry scale (P<.001) core exercises and PNF can safely be used as a major tool for geriatric subjects with lumbar spine disorders was evident.
Limitations of this original research were of a shorter duration, only obesity and subjective rating scale were used as tools of measurement. Recommendations of further studies with post physiotherapy NMRI, larger sample size of similar subjects of both sex and longer duration follow up. The author declares no financial conflict towards publication of this original research Space.
Conservative physiotherapy among geriatric subjects requires more attention as recorded in this research subjects chances of undergoing surgery was avoided, with in shorter time frame and specific exercises used. The outcome of this study can be used for the benefit of subjects with lumbar spine disorders of various ages.
© 2017 Subramanian ss. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.