- About Us
- Guidelines
-
The Author ensures that the research has been conducted responsibly and ethically with adherence to all relevant regulations. read more..
- For Authors
- For Reviewer
- Manuscript Guidelines
- Membership
-
- Journals
- Reprints
- e-Books
- Videos
- Indexing
- Contact Us
COVID-19
- Submissions
Abstract
Gastroenterology Medicine & Research
Reply To: Comments on “Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Versus Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) for Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis”
-
Open or Close Feng Xian Wei* and You Cheng Zhang
Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, China
*Corresponding author: Feng Xian Wei, MD, Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Gansu 730030, China
Submission: November 12, 2017; Published: January 29, 2018
ISSN 2637-7632Volume1 Issue1
Abstract
We would like to thank Dr Qu and Dr Ma for their interests in our article, and also thank editor for a opportunity to improve our work. For current less-invasive hernia repair study, operation method and repair material were the most important issues [1]. Our study reviewed the current evidence and concluded an advantage of TAPP in clinical feasibility with comparable efficacy compared with TEP. In their correspondence they raised 2 questions in trial quality assessment and combined model, to which we would reply as follows.
Editor In Chief
.jpg)
Signup for Newsletter
Quick Links
Editorial Board Registrations
Submit your Article
Best Paper of the Volume
Reprints
Refer a Friend
Advertise With UsOur Recent Edition
.jpg)
Top Editors
.jpg)
.bmp)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Financial Support
Sponsors
Latest e-Books
Latest Video
a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.crimsonpublishers.com.
Best viewed in 
| Above IE 9.0 version